BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34725447)

  • 1. Real-time diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate core needle biopsies using nonlinear microscopy.
    Cahill LC; Rosen S; Yoshitake T; Wu Y; York L; Tsai LL; Gershman B; Fujimoto JG; Sun Y
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Apr; 35(4):539-548. PubMed ID: 34725447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid histological imaging of bone without microtome sectioning using nonlinear microscopy.
    Yoshitake T; Rosen S; Cahill LC; Lamothe S; Ward A; Fujimoto JG
    Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116254. PubMed ID: 34743041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing histologic evaluation of prostate tissue using nonlinear microscopy and paraffin H&E: a pilot study.
    Cahill LC; Fujimoto JG; Giacomelli MG; Yoshitake T; Wu Y; Lin DI; Ye H; Carrasco-Zevallos OM; Wagner AA; Rosen S
    Mod Pathol; 2019 Jul; 32(8):1158-1167. PubMed ID: 30914763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear microscopy for detection of prostate cancer: analysis of sensitivity and specificity in radical prostatectomies.
    Cahill LC; Wu Y; Yoshitake T; Ponchiardi C; Giacomelli MG; Wagner AA; Rosen S; Fujimoto JG
    Mod Pathol; 2020 May; 33(5):916-923. PubMed ID: 31745288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
    Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid virtual hematoxylin and eosin histology of breast tissue specimens using a compact fluorescence nonlinear microscope.
    Cahill LC; Giacomelli MG; Yoshitake T; Vardeh H; Faulkner-Jones BE; Connolly JL; Sun CK; Fujimoto JG
    Lab Invest; 2018 Jan; 98(1):150-160. PubMed ID: 29131161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
    Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulated Raman Scattering Microscopy Enables Gleason Scoring of Prostate Core Needle Biopsy by a Convolutional Neural Network.
    Ao J; Shao X; Liu Z; Liu Q; Xia J; Shi Y; Qi L; Pan J; Ji M
    Cancer Res; 2023 Feb; 83(4):641-651. PubMed ID: 36594873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-Resolution Rapid Diagnostic Imaging of Whole Prostate Biopsies Using Video-Rate Fluorescence Structured Illumination Microscopy.
    Wang M; Kimbrell HZ; Sholl AB; Tulman DB; Elfer KN; Schlichenmeyer TC; Lee BR; Lacey M; Brown JQ
    Cancer Res; 2015 Oct; 75(19):4032-41. PubMed ID: 26282168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis.
    Sidana A; Watson MJ; George AK; Rastinehad AR; Vourganti S; Rais-Bahrami S; Muthigi A; Maruf M; Gordetsky JB; Nix JW; Merino MJ; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):341.e1-341.e7. PubMed ID: 29753548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies.
    Steiner DF; Nagpal K; Sayres R; Foote DJ; Wedin BD; Pearce A; Cai CJ; Winter SR; Symonds M; Yatziv L; Kapishnikov A; Brown T; Flament-Auvigne I; Tan F; Stumpe MC; Jiang PP; Liu Y; Chen PC; Corrado GS; Terry M; Mermel CH
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2023267. PubMed ID: 33180129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy significantly upgrades prostate cancer versus systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound biopsy.
    Siddiqui MM; Rais-Bahrami S; Truong H; Stamatakis L; Vourganti S; Nix J; Hoang AN; Walton-Diaz A; Shuch B; Weintraub M; Kruecker J; Amalou H; Turkbey B; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
    Eur Urol; 2013 Nov; 64(5):713-719. PubMed ID: 23787357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual Assessment of 2-Dimensional Levels Within 3-Dimensional Pathology Data Sets of Prostate Needle Biopsies Reveals Substantial Spatial Heterogeneity.
    Koyuncu C; Janowczyk A; Farre X; Pathak T; Mirtti T; Fernandez PL; Pons L; Reder NP; Serafin R; Chow SSL; Viswanathan VS; Glaser AK; True LD; Liu JTC; Madabhushi A
    Lab Invest; 2023 Dec; 103(12):100265. PubMed ID: 37858679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
    Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of breast pathologies using nonlinear microscopy.
    Tao YK; Shen D; Sheikine Y; Ahsen OO; Wang HH; Schmolze DB; Johnson NB; Brooker JS; Cable AE; Connolly JL; Fujimoto JG
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Oct; 111(43):15304-9. PubMed ID: 25313045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of Deep Learning to Develop and Analyze Computational Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining of Prostate Core Biopsy Images for Tumor Diagnosis.
    Rana A; Lowe A; Lithgow M; Horback K; Janovitz T; Da Silva A; Tsai H; Shanmugam V; Bayat A; Shah P
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e205111. PubMed ID: 32432709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the Prediction of Prostate Cancer Overall Survival by Supplementing Readily Available Clinical Data with Gene Expression Levels of IGFBP3 and F3 in Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Core Needle Biopsy Material.
    Peng Z; Andersson K; Lindholm J; Dethlefsen O; Pramana S; Pawitan Y; Nistér M; Nilsson S; Li C
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0145545. PubMed ID: 26731648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of histological findings obtained combining US/mp-MRI fusion-guided biopsies with systematic US biopsies: mp-MRI role in prostate cancer detection and false negative.
    Faiella E; Santucci D; Greco F; Frauenfelder G; Giacobbe V; Muto G; Zobel BB; Grasso RF
    Radiol Med; 2018 Feb; 123(2):143-152. PubMed ID: 29019021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimizing the Number of Cores Targeted During Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Target Biopsy.
    Kenigsberg AP; Renson A; Rosenkrantz AB; Huang R; Wysock JS; Taneja SS; Bjurlin MA
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Oct; 1(5):418-425. PubMed ID: 31158081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.