These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34725567)

  • 1. Quantifying the role of the COVID-19 pandemic in the 2020 U.S. presidential elections.
    De Lellis P; Ruiz Marín M; Porfiri M
    Eur Phys J Spec Top; 2022; 231(9):1635-1643. PubMed ID: 34725567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nail in the Coffin or Lifeline? Evaluating the Electoral Impact of COVID-19 on President Trump in the 2020 Election.
    Algara C; Amlani S; Collitt S; Hale I; Kazemian S
    Polit Behav; 2022 Oct; ():1-29. PubMed ID: 36311381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election.
    Baccini L; Brodeur A; Weymouth S
    J Popul Econ; 2021; 34(2):739-767. PubMed ID: 33469244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election.
    Curtis LH; Hoffman MN; Califf RM; Hammill BG
    SSM Popul Health; 2021 Sep; 15():100840. PubMed ID: 34169139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Did Covid-19 Kill Trump Politically? The Pandemic and Voting in the 2020 Presidential Election.
    Clarke H; Stewart MC; Ho K
    Soc Sci Q; 2021 Sep; 102(5):2194-2209. PubMed ID: 34226770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electoral College bias and the 2020 presidential election.
    Erikson RS; Sigman K; Yao L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Nov; 117(45):27940-27944. PubMed ID: 33106408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. County community health associations of net voting shift in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
    Wasfy JH; Stewart C; Bhambhani V
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185051. PubMed ID: 28968415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The abortion issue in the 1984 elections.
    Granberg D
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1987; 19(2):59-62. PubMed ID: 3595819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. (Un)happiness and voting in U.S. presidential elections.
    Ward G; De Neve JE; Ungar LH; Eichstaedt JC
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2021 Feb; 120(2):370-383. PubMed ID: 32700960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Demographic change and the 2016 presidential election.
    Maggio C
    Soc Sci Res; 2021 Mar; 95():102459. PubMed ID: 33653583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diverging Life Expectancies and Voting Patterns in the 2016 US Presidential Election.
    Bor J
    Am J Public Health; 2017 Oct; 107(10):1560-1562. PubMed ID: 28817322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When a lack of passion intertwines with thought and action: Neutral feelings about COVID-19 are associated with U.S. presidential candidate attitudes and voting behavior.
    Park HJ; Hu D; Haynes E; Gasper K
    Emotion; 2021 Dec; 21(8):1796-1800. PubMed ID: 34843303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conservatism and infrequent mask usage: A study of US counties during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
    Gonzalez KE; James R; Bjorklund ET; Hill TD
    Soc Sci Q; 2021 Sep; 102(5):2368-2382. PubMed ID: 34908612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A 2 million-person, campaign-wide field experiment shows how digital advertising affects voter turnout.
    Aggarwal M; Allen J; Coppock A; Frankowski D; Messing S; Zhang K; Barnes J; Beasley A; Hantman H; Zheng S
    Nat Hum Behav; 2023 Mar; 7(3):332-341. PubMed ID: 36635584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. Foreign Policy on the Verge of a New Path.
    Prikhodko OV
    Her Russ Acad Sci; 2021; 91(6):667-676. PubMed ID: 35125840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. #Election2020: the first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US Presidential election.
    Chen E; Deb A; Ferrara E
    J Comput Soc Sci; 2022; 5(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 33824934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Independent Relationship of Changes in Death Rates with Changes in US Presidential Voting.
    Goldman L; Lim MP; Chen Q; Jin P; Muennig P; Vagelos A
    J Gen Intern Med; 2019 Mar; 34(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 30187378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Local demographic changes and US presidential voting, 2012 to 2016.
    Hill SJ; Hopkins DJ; Huber GA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2019 Dec; 116(50):25023-25028. PubMed ID: 31744870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Presidential, But Not Prime Minister, Candidates With Lower Pitched Voices Stand a Better Chance of Winning the Election in Conservative Countries.
    Banai B; Laustsen L; Banai IP; Bovan K
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918758736. PubMed ID: 29911405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.