These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

31 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34725802)

  • 1. Modeling Rapid Guessing Behaviors in Computer-Based Testlet Items.
    Jin KY; Hsu CL; Chiu MM; Chen PH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Jan; 47(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 36425284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incorporating calibration errors in oral reading fluency scoring.
    Qiao X; Kamata A; Potgieter C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38726687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating Modes of Observations Using Hierarchical Signal Detection Rater Models.
    Park YS; Lin Q; Xing K
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(4):843-858. PubMed ID: 36502400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Potential for Bias: Rater Cognition and the Influence of Prior Performance Information.
    Ho Lee S; Shaw T; Tran C; Humphrey-Murto S
    Acad Med; 2023 Sep; 98(9):1096. PubMed ID: 36044269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian many-facet Rasch model with Markov modeling for rater severity drift.
    Uto M
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3910-3928. PubMed ID: 36284065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shared decision making: developing the OPTION scale for measuring patient involvement.
    Elwyn G; Edwards A; Wensing M; Hood K; Atwell C; Grol R
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2003 Apr; 12(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 12679504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How reliable are Functional Movement Screening scores? A systematic review of rater reliability.
    Moran RW; Schneiders AG; Major KM; Sullivan SJ
    Br J Sports Med; 2016 May; 50(9):527-36. PubMed ID: 26316583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A new item response theory model for rater centrality using a hierarchical rater model approach.
    Qiu XL; Chiu MM; Wang WC; Chen PH
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Aug; 54(4):1854-1868. PubMed ID: 34725802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive Diagnostic Models for Rater Effects.
    Li X; Wang WC; Xie Q
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():525. PubMed ID: 32265810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Human ratings take time: A hierarchical facets model for the joint analysis of ratings and rating times.
    Jin KY; Eckes T
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3535-3547. PubMed ID: 37919615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting Rater Effects under Rating Designs with Varying Levels of Missingness.
    Stafford RE; Wolfe EW; Casablanca JM; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(3):243-257. PubMed ID: 30169333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Models and Indices for Detecting Rater Centrality.
    Wolfe EW; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2015; 16(3):228-41. PubMed ID: 26753219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using Repeated Ratings to Improve Measurement Precision in Incomplete Rating Designs.
    Jones E; Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(2):148-161. PubMed ID: 29894984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining the Impacts of Rater Effects in Performance Assessments.
    Wind SA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Mar; 43(2):159-171. PubMed ID: 30792562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.