BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34725823)

  • 1. Touch DNA recovery from vehicle surfaces using different swabs.
    Giovanelli A; Grazinoli Garrido R; Rocha A; Hessab T
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):707-711. PubMed ID: 34725823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
    Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
    Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Collection techniques of touch DNA deposited on human skin following a strangulation scenario.
    Alketbi SK
    Int J Legal Med; 2023 Sep; 137(5):1347-1352. PubMed ID: 37278841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
    Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sampling touch DNA from human skin following skin-to-skin contact in mock assault scenarios-A comparison of nine collection methods.
    Kallupurackal V; Kummer S; Voegeli P; Kratzer A; Dørum G; Haas C; Hess S
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Sep; 66(5):1889-1900. PubMed ID: 33928655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Swabs as DNA collection devices for sampling different biological materials from different substrates.
    Verdon TJ; Mitchell RJ; van Oorschot RA
    J Forensic Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(4):1080-9. PubMed ID: 24502761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Copan microFLOQ® Direct Swab collection of bloodstains, saliva, and semen on cotton cloth.
    Sherier AJ; Kieser RE; Novroski NMM; Wendt FR; King JL; Woerner AE; Ambers A; Garofano P; Budowle B
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Jan; 134(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 31165261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Isohelix™ and Rayon swabbing systems for touch DNA recovery from metal surfaces.
    Bonsu DOM; Rodie M; Higgins D; Henry J; Austin JJ
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2021 Dec; 17(4):577-584. PubMed ID: 34674113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of a novel material, Diomics X-Swab™, for collection of DNA.
    Marshall PL; Stoljarova M; Larue BL; King JL; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():192-8. PubMed ID: 25016249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double swab technique for collecting touched evidence.
    Pang BC; Cheung BK
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 Jul; 9(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 17320457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cell counting to monitor swab efficiency.
    Nolan M; Linacre A
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 May; 69(3):1002-1010. PubMed ID: 38380584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy of "touch" DNA recovery and room-temperature storage from assault rifle magazines.
    Tasker E; Roman MG; Akosile M; Mayes C; Hughes S; LaRue B
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2020 Mar; 43():101658. PubMed ID: 31954956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct PCR amplification of DNA from human bloodstains, saliva, and touch samples collected with microFLOQ
    Ambers A; Wiley R; Novroski N; Budowle B
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():80-87. PubMed ID: 29126000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visualising latent DNA on swabs.
    Kanokwongnuwut P; Kirkbride P; Linacre A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Oct; 291():115-123. PubMed ID: 30195152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of criteria influencing the success rate of DNA swabs in operational conditions: A contribution to an evidence-based approach to crime scene investigation and triage.
    Baechler S
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 Jan; 20():130-139. PubMed ID: 26590861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
    Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A holistic approach for the selection of forensic DNA swabs.
    Comment D; Gouy A; Zingg C; Zieger M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111737. PubMed ID: 37247525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of DNA collection and retrieval from two swab types (cotton and nylon flocked swab) when processed using three QIAGEN extraction methods.
    Brownlow RJ; Dagnall KE; Ames CE
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 May; 57(3):713-7. PubMed ID: 22211626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
    Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.