These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3472607)

  • 1. Evaluation of the Bergen cephalometric norms: a radiological and statistical appraisal.
    Järvinen S
    Br J Orthod; 1987 Apr; 14(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 3472607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the correlation box (Segner) for characterization of the facial skeleton.
    Järvinen SH
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1992; 88(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 1470631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relation between centric slide and Angle's classification.
    Afzal A; Qamruddin I
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Aug; 15(8):481-4. PubMed ID: 16202359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative X-ray cephalometric characteristics of patients with bite anomalies in the 1st and 2d subclasses of Angle's class II].
    Reva VV; Anikienko AA; Bogdashevskaia VB
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1987; 66(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 3470998
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relation of the Wits appraisal to the ANB angle: a statistical appraisal.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Nov; 94(5):432-5. PubMed ID: 3189246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A cephalometric appraisal of cases of Angle's Class II, Division I malocclusion treated by the Andresen appliance.
    Parkhouse RC
    Dent Pract Dent Rec; 1969 Aug; 19(12):425-33. PubMed ID: 5257260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Assessment of Facial Asymmetry in Malocclusion using Posteroanterior View.
    Sahu A; Lall R; Nezam S; Singh R; Kumar SB; Ayub FB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 19(6):712-718. PubMed ID: 29959301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence of muscle role over the cranio-facial skull development in Angle's Class III dental malocclusion under the clinical rest position.
    Gomes AC; Vitti M; Regalo SC; Semprini M; Siéssere S; Watanabe PC; Palomari ET
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2008; 48(8):335-41. PubMed ID: 19097473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The study on characteristics of soft tissue profile for different malocclusion].
    Zhang DQ; Shi X; Zheng MQ
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Dec; 22(6):496-8. PubMed ID: 15656531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of Gender Dimorphism on Sagittal Cephalometry in Pakistani Population.
    Qamruddin I; Alam MK; Shahid F; Tanveer S; Mukhtiar M; Asim Z
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):390-3. PubMed ID: 27225144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Properties of the ANB angle and the Wits appraisal in the skeletal estimation of Angle's Class III patients.
    Iwasaki H; Ishikawa H; Chowdhury L; Nakamura S; Iida J
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):477-83. PubMed ID: 12407943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differential diagnosis of pseudo Class III malocclusion by clinical and cephalometric appraisal.
    Haralabakis HN; Spyropoulos ND
    Trans Eur Orthod Soc; 1973; ():303-9. PubMed ID: 4618697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [How exact are radiographic cephalometric findings? A study on the determination of the occlusion using the ANB angle].
    Schmuth GP; Altuna G
    Osterr Z Stomatol; 1971; 68(9):370-81. PubMed ID: 5289356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of cephalometric measurements from three radiological clinics.
    Gonçalves FA; Schiavon L; Pereira Neto JS; Nouer DF
    Braz Oral Res; 2006; 20(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 16878211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The best time for orthodontic treatment for Polish children based on skeletal age analysis in accordance to refund policy of the Polish National Health Fund (NFZ).
    Flieger R; Matys J; Dominiak M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1377-1382. PubMed ID: 30048055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of mandible between normal occlusion and Angle's Class II division 1 malocclusion samples. (A cephalometric study).
    Khatri VT; Modi AB; Parikh NH
    J Indian Orthod Soc; 1977; 9(2):7-20. PubMed ID: 296294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the use of the SNA and SNB angles in cephalometric analyses.
    Walker GF; Kowalski CJ
    Am J Orthod; 1973 Nov; 64(5):517-23. PubMed ID: 4518058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of vertical parameters in cephalometry.
    Bock JJ; Fuhrmann RA
    J Orofac Orthop; 2007 May; 68(3):210-22. PubMed ID: 17522805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [X-ray cephalometric characteristic of face soft tissue profile in orthognatic bite].
    Zhulev EN; Marakhtanov NB
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2007; 86(4):67-70. PubMed ID: 17828100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pathognomonic cephalometric characteristics of Angle Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Brezniak N; Arad A; Heller M; Dinbar A; Dinte A; Wasserstein A
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Jun; 72(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 12071609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.