These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34726439)

  • 1. Delaying metamemory judgments corrects the expectancy illusion in source monitoring: The role of fluency and belief.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jul; 48(7):975-1000. PubMed ID: 34726439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The metamemory expectancy illusion in source monitoring affects metamemory control and memory.
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ
    Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104468. PubMed ID: 33160240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?
    Schaper ML; Bayen UJ; Hey CV
    Metacogn Learn; 2023; 18(1):55-80. PubMed ID: 35968027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Memory and metamemory for social interactions: Evidence for a metamemory expectancy illusion.
    Mieth L; Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bell R
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jan; 49(1):14-31. PubMed ID: 32734524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Metacognitive differentiation of item memory and source memory in schema-based source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):743-765. PubMed ID: 36521154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metamemory expectancy illusion and schema-consistent guessing in source monitoring.
    Schaper ML; Kuhlmann BG; Bayen UJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):470-496. PubMed ID: 30024249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian inference model for metamemory.
    Hu X; Zheng J; Su N; Fan T; Yang C; Yin Y; Fleming SM; Luo L
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Oct; 128(5):824-855. PubMed ID: 34043396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Item-specific and relational encoding are effective at reducing the illusion of competence.
    Maxwell NP; Cates EE; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):1023-1044. PubMed ID: 37926731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Search fluency as a misleading measure of memory.
    Stone SM; Storm BC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 31886699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Explaining the forgetting bias effect on value judgments: The influence of memory for a past test.
    Rhodes MG; Witherby AE; Castel AD; Murayama K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27873187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The anchoring effect in metamemory monitoring.
    Yang C; Sun B; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):384-397. PubMed ID: 29164524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there more to metamemory? An argument for two specialized monitoring abilities.
    McDonough IM; Enam T; Kraemer KR; Eakin DK; Kim M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Oct; 28(5):1657-1667. PubMed ID: 33948916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do Beliefs About Font Size Affect Retrospective Metamemory Judgments in Addition to Prospective Judgments?
    Luna K; Albuquerque PB
    Exp Psychol; 2022 May; 69(3):172-184. PubMed ID: 35975625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metamemory judgments have dissociable reactivity effects on item and interitem relational memory.
    Zhao W; Li J; Shanks DR; Li B; Hu X; Yang C; Luo L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):557-574. PubMed ID: 36848046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory.
    Mitchum AL; Kelley CM; Fox MC
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Feb; 145(2):200-19. PubMed ID: 27045282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of identical word pairs on people's metamemory judgments: What are the contributions of processing fluency and beliefs about memory?
    Mueller ML; Dunlosky J; Tauber SK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):781-99. PubMed ID: 26059683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How cognitive conflict affects judgments of learning: Evaluating the contributions of processing fluency and metamemory beliefs.
    Li X; Chen G; Yang C
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):912-922. PubMed ID: 33675000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning.
    Undorf M; Amaefule CO; Kamp SM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Mar; 169():107176. PubMed ID: 32001337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "You don't know what this means to me" - Uncovering idiosyncratic influences on metamemory judgments.
    Undorf M; Navarro-Báez S; Bröder A
    Cognition; 2022 May; 222():105011. PubMed ID: 35144099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal metacognitive control of memory recall.
    Callaway F; Griffiths TL; Norman KA; Zhang Q
    Psychol Rev; 2024 Apr; 131(3):781-811. PubMed ID: 37732967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.