These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34726466)

  • 1. Invited commentary: Comparing the independent segments procedure with group sequential designs.
    Lakens D
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):498-500. PubMed ID: 34726466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative sequential methods in statistical testing: A reply to Lakens (2021) and Erdfelder and Schnuerch (2021).
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):507-512. PubMed ID: 34726468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A simple, general, and efficient method for sequential hypothesis testing: The independent segments procedure.
    Miller J; Ulrich R
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):486-497. PubMed ID: 33017157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the efficiency of the independent segments procedure: A direct comparison with sequential probability ratio tests.
    Erdfelder E; Schnuerch M
    Psychol Methods; 2021 Aug; 26(4):501-506. PubMed ID: 34726467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlling decision errors with minimal costs: The sequential probability ratio t test.
    Schnuerch M; Erdfelder E
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Apr; 25(2):206-226. PubMed ID: 31497982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Bayesian sequential design with binary outcome.
    Zhu H; Yu Q; Mercante DE
    Pharm Stat; 2017 May; 16(3):192-200. PubMed ID: 28251815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exact inference for adaptive group sequential designs.
    Gao P; Liu L; Mehta C
    Stat Med; 2013 Oct; 32(23):3991-4005. PubMed ID: 23686358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimality criteria for futility stopping boundaries for group sequential designs with a continuous endpoint.
    Li X; Herrmann C; Rauch G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):274. PubMed ID: 33153438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Bayesian sequential design using alpha spending function to control type I error.
    Zhu H; Yu Q
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2184-2196. PubMed ID: 26187736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An additive boundary for group sequential designs with connection to conditional error.
    Xi D; Gallo P
    Stat Med; 2019 Oct; 38(23):4656-4669. PubMed ID: 31338847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A brief review on software developments for group sequential and adaptive designs.
    Wassmer G; Vandemeulebroecke M
    Biom J; 2006 Aug; 48(4):732-7. PubMed ID: 16972726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equivalence Tests: A Practical Primer for
    Lakens D
    Soc Psychol Personal Sci; 2017 May; 8(4):355-362. PubMed ID: 28736600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficient group sequential designs when there are several effect sizes under consideration.
    Jennison C; Turnbull BW
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):917-32. PubMed ID: 16220524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Design and monitoring of multi-arm multi-stage clinical trials.
    Ghosh P; Liu L; Senchaudhuri P; Gao P; Mehta C
    Biometrics; 2017 Dec; 73(4):1289-1299. PubMed ID: 28346823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information time scales for interim analyses of randomized clinical trials.
    Freidlin B; Othus M; Korn EL
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 27136947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal flexible sample size design with robust power.
    Zhang L; Cui L; Yang B
    Stat Med; 2016 Aug; 35(19):3385-96. PubMed ID: 26999385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interim evaluation of efficacy or futility in group-sequential trials with multiple co-primary endpoints.
    Asakura K; Hamasaki T; Evans SR
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):703-731. PubMed ID: 27757980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementing type I & type II error spending for two-sided group sequential designs.
    Rudser KD; Emerson SS
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 May; 29(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17933592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sequential designs for equivalence studies.
    Whitehead J
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(24):2703-15. PubMed ID: 8981681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimized multi-stage designs controlling the false discovery or the family-wise error rate.
    Zehetmayer S; Bauer P; Posch M
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(21):4145-60. PubMed ID: 18444249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.