These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34729000)

  • 1. Prioritization of realignment associated with superior clinical outcomes for surgical cervical deformity patients.
    Pierce KE; Passias PG; Brown AE; Bortz CA; Alas H; Lafage R; Krol O; Chou D; Burton DC; Line B; Klineberg E; Hart R; Gum J; Daniels A; Hamilton K; Bess S; Protopsaltis T; Shaffrey C; Schwab FA; Smith JS; Lafage V; Ames C;
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2021; 12(3):311-317. PubMed ID: 34729000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients.
    Pierce KE; Passias PG; Brown AE; Bortz CA; Alas H; Passfall L; Krol O; Kummer N; Lafage R; Chou D; Burton DC; Line B; Klineberg E; Hart R; Gum J; Daniels A; Hamilton K; Bess S; Protopsaltis T; Shaffrey C; Schwab FA; Smith JS; Lafage V; Ames C;
    Neurospine; 2021 Sep; 18(3):506-514. PubMed ID: 34610683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. At What Point Should the Thoracolumbar Region Be Addressed in Patients Undergoing Corrective Cervical Deformity Surgery?
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Naessig S; Ahmad W; Passfall L; Lafage R; Lafage V; Kim HJ; Daniels A; Eastlack R; Klineberg E; Line B; Mummaneni P; Hart R; Burton D; Bess S; Schwab F; Shaffrey C; Smith JS; Ames CP;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 Oct; 46(20):E1113-E1118. PubMed ID: 34559752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting the combined occurrence of poor clinical and radiographic outcomes following cervical deformity corrective surgery.
    Horn SR; Passias PG; Oh C; Lafage V; Lafage R; Smith JS; Line B; Anand N; Segreto FA; Bortz CA; Scheer JK; Eastlack RK; Deviren V; Mummaneni PV; Daniels AH; Park P; Nunley PD; Kim HJ; Klineberg EO; Burton DC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Nov; 32(2):182-190. PubMed ID: 31675700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What are the major drivers of outcomes in cervical deformity surgery?
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Imbo B; Krol O; Passfall L; Tretiakov P; Moattari K; Williamson T; Joujon-Roche R; Passano B; Ahmad W; Naessig S; Diebo B
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2021; 12(4):401-405. PubMed ID: 35068823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What are the major drivers of outcomes in cervical deformity surgery?
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Passano B; Tariq MB; Ahmad S; Singh V; Owusu-Sarpong S; Krol O; Imbo B; Passfall L; Tretiakov P; Williamson T; Joujon-Roche R; Ahmad W; Naessig S; Diebo B
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2021; 12(4):376-380. PubMed ID: 35068819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical and spinopelvic parameters can predict patient reported outcomes following cervical deformity surgery.
    Passias PG; Pierce KE; Imbo B; Passfall L; Krol O; Joujon-Roche R; Williamson T; Moattari K; Tretiakov P; Adenwalla A; Chern I; Alas H; Bortz CA; Brown AE; Vira S; Diebo BG; Sciubba DM; Lafage R; Lafage V
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2022; 13(1):62-66. PubMed ID: 35386250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictors of Superior Recovery Kinetics in Adult Cervical Deformity Correction: An Analysis Using a Novel Area Under the Curve Methodology.
    Pierce KE; Passias PG; Brown AE; Bortz CA; Alas H; Lafage R; Lafage V; Ames C; Burton DC; Hart R; Hamilton K; Gum J; Scheer J; Daniels A; Bess S; Soroceanu A; Klineberg E; Shaffrey C; Line B; Schwab FA; Smith JS;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 May; 46(9):559-566. PubMed ID: 33595260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Importance of C2 Slope, a Singular Marker of Cervical Deformity, Correlates With Patient-reported Outcomes.
    Protopsaltis TS; Ramchandran S; Tishelman JC; Smith JS; Neuman BJ; Jr GMM; Lafage R; Klineberg EO; Hamilton DK; LaFage V; Gupta MC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Burton DC; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Feb; 45(3):184-192. PubMed ID: 31513111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improvement in some Ames-ISSG cervical deformity classification modifier grades may correlate with clinical improvement.
    Horn SR; Passias PG; Passfall L; Lafage R; Smith JS; Poorman GW; Steinmetz LM; Bortz CA; Segreto FA; Diebo B; Hart R; Burton D; Shaffrey CI; Sciubba DM; Klineberg EO; Protopsaltis TS; Schwab FJ; Bess S; Lafage V; Ames C;
    J Clin Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 89():297-304. PubMed ID: 34119284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of osteotomy grade and location on regional and global alignment following cervical deformity surgery.
    Passias PG; Horn SR; Raman T; Brown AE; Lafage V; Lafage R; Smith JS; Bortz CA; Segreto FA; Pierce KE; Alas H; Line BG; Diebo BG; Daniels AH; Kim HJ; Soroceanu A; Mundis GM; Protopsaltis TS; Klineberg EO; Burton DC; Hart RA; Schwab FJ; Bess S; Shaffrey CI; Ames CP;
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2019; 10(3):160-166. PubMed ID: 31772428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. PROMIS physical health domain scores are related to cervical deformity severity.
    Pierce KE; Alas H; Brown AE; Bortz CA; O'Connell B; Vasquez-Montes D; Diebo BG; Lafage R; Lafage V; Buckland AJ; Passias PG
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2019; 10(3):179-183. PubMed ID: 31772431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity?
    Passfall L; Williamson TK; Krol O; Lebovic J; Imbo B; Joujon-Roche R; Tretiakov P; Dangas K; Owusu-Sarpong S; Koller H; Schoenfeld AJ; Diebo BG; Vira S; Lafage R; Lafage V; Passias PG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 Sep; 37(3):368-375. PubMed ID: 35426823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnitude of preoperative cervical lordotic compensation and C2-T3 angle are correlated to increased risk of postoperative sagittal spinal pelvic malalignment in adult thoracolumbar deformity patients at 2-year follow-up.
    Passias PG; Soroceanu A; Scheer J; Yang S; Boniello A; Smith JS; Protopsaltis T; Kim HJ; Schwab F; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Mundis G; Lafage R; Hart R; Shaffrey C; Lafage V; Ames C;
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1756-63. PubMed ID: 25862507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraoperative alignment goals for distinctive sagittal morphotypes of severe cervical deformity to achieve optimal improvements in health-related quality of life measures.
    Virk S; Passias P; Lafage R; Klineberg E; Mundis G; Protopsaltis T; Shaffrey C; Bess S; Burton D; Hart R; Kim HJ; Ames C; Schwab F; Smith J; Lafage V;
    Spine J; 2020 Aug; 20(8):1267-1275. PubMed ID: 32209421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical deformity patients with baseline hyperlordosis or hyperkyphosis differ in surgical treatment and radiographic outcomes.
    Alas H; Passias PG; Diebo BG; Brown AE; Pierce KE; Bortz C; Lafage R; Ames CP; Line B; Klineberg EO; Burton DC; Uribe JS; Kim HJ; Daniels AH; Bess S; Protopsaltis T; Mundis GM; Shaffrey CI; Schwab FJ; Smith JS; Lafage V
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2021; 12(3):279-286. PubMed ID: 34728995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do the newly proposed realignment targets bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in adult cervical deformity corrective surgery.
    Pierce KE; Krol O; Lebovic J; Kummer N; Passfall L; Ahmad W; Naessig S; Diebo B; Passias PG
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2022; 13(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 35386239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of Three Different Positioning Techniques on Surgical Corrections and Postoperative Alignment in Cervical Spinal Deformity (CD) Surgery.
    Morse KW; Lafage R; Passias P; Ames CP; Hart R; Shaffrey CI; Mundis G; Protopsaltis T; Gupta M; Klineberg E; Burton D; Lafage V; Kim HJ;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2021 May; 46(9):567-570. PubMed ID: 33290369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis and C2-7 Sagittal Vertical Axis Criteria of a Cervical Spine Deformity Classification System Using Long-Term Follow-up Data After Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery.
    Hyun SJ; Han S; Kim KJ; Jahng TA; Kim HJ
    Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2019 Jan; 16(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 29617850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Timing of conversion to cervical malalignment and proximal junctional kyphosis following surgical correction of adult spinal deformity: a 3-year radiographic analysis.
    Passias PG; Alas H; Naessig S; Kim HJ; Lafage R; Ames C; Klineberg E; Pierce K; Ahmad W; Burton D; Diebo B; Bess S; Hamilton DK; Gupta M; Park P; Line B; Shaffrey CI; Smith JS; Schwab F; Lafage V;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Mar; 34(6):830-838. PubMed ID: 33740768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.