142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34729345)
1. Comparison of osseointegration of Ti-Al
Bozoglan A; Dundar S
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2021; 11(4):624-627. PubMed ID: 34729345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Osseointegration of Five Different Surfaced Titanium Implants.
Dundar S; Yaman F; Bozoglan A; Yildirim TT; Kirtay M; Ozupek MF; Artas G
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 29(7):1991-1995. PubMed ID: 29621087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cytocompatibility and osseointegration of the Ti implants with XPEED® surfaces.
Lee SY; Yang DJ; Yeo S; An HW; Ryoo KH; Park KB
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1283-9. PubMed ID: 22093072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of the Application Local Zoledronic Acid On Different Dental Implants in Rats On Osseointegration.
Bingul MB; Gul M; Dundar S; Bozoglan A; Kirtay M; Ozupek MF; Ozcan EC; Habek O; Tasdemir I
Drug Des Devel Ther; 2024; 18():2249-2256. PubMed ID: 38895174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical and Morphometric Evaluation of a Strontium-Incorporated Implant and Four Commercially Available Implants: A Study in Rabbits.
Wu YF; Lin GF; Zhang LF; He FM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(3):531-541. PubMed ID: 32406650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of marginal bone loss in SLA and RBM implants: A prospective cohort study.
Nemati M; Dadkhah B; Tabrizi R; Shafiei S; Moslemi H
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2023; 14(3):388-391. PubMed ID: 38273914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium implants in a rabbit tibiae model evaluated by microtomography, histomorphometry and fluorochrome labeling analyses.
Martins R; Cestari TM; Arantes RVN; Santos PS; Taga R; Carbonari MJ; Oliveira RC
J Periodontal Res; 2018 Apr; 53(2):210-221. PubMed ID: 29044523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osseointegration of magnesium-incorporated sand-blasted acid-etched implant in the dog mandible: Resonance frequency measurements and histomorphometric analysis.
Song WW; Heo JH; Lee JH; Park YM; Kim YD
Tissue Eng Regen Med; 2016 Apr; 13(2):191-199. PubMed ID: 30603399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Investigation of the Osseointegration of Titanium Implants With Different Surfaces Placed With Allogeneic Bone Transfer.
Özcan EC; Aydin MA; Dundar S; Tanrisever M; Bal A; Karasu N; Kirtay M
J Craniofac Surg; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38781429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of early osseointegration between laser-treated/acid-etched and sandblasted/acid-etched titanium implant surfaces.
Rong M; Lu H; Wan L; Zhang X; Lin X; Li S; Zhou L; Lv Y; Su Y
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Mar; 29(4):43. PubMed ID: 29603028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of local application of the ankaferd blood stopper on osseointegration in three different surface titanium implants.
Ozcan EC; Gul M; Dundar S; Bozoglan A; Karasu N; Bal A; Gunes N; Bingul MB
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2021; 11(4):524-528. PubMed ID: 34377660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of hydrothermal spark discharge anodization in the early integration of implants in sheep sinuses.
Duncan WJ; Gay JH; Lee MH; Bae TS; Lee SJ; Loch C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 Aug; 27(8):975-80. PubMed ID: 26798978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
Lee JT; Cho SA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits.
Piattelli M; Scarano A; Paolantonio M; Iezzi G; Petrone G; Piattelli A
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 12498456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of two dental implant surface modifications on implants with same macrodesign: an experimental study in the pelvic sheep model.
Ernst S; Stübinger S; Schüpbach P; Sidler M; Klein K; Ferguson SJ; von Rechenberg B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Aug; 26(8):898-908. PubMed ID: 24954017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osseointegration of titanium implants with SLAffinity treatment: a histological and biomechanical study in miniature pigs.
Ou KL; Hsu HJ; Yang TS; Lin YH; Chen CS; Peng PW
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Sep; 20(7):1515-24. PubMed ID: 26507647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bone Response to Conventional Titanium Implants and New Zirconia Implants Produced by Additive Manufacturing.
Kim JC; Yeo IL
Materials (Basel); 2021 Aug; 14(16):. PubMed ID: 34442927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
