These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34729603)

  • 1. SCREENING MAMMOGRAPHY: DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY-ISSUES AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE 2020S.
    Hooshmand S; Reed WM; Suleiman ME; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Nov; 197(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 34729603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Measurements errors in screening mammogram interpretation by radiologists].
    Ventura-Alfaro CE
    Rev Salud Publica (Bogota); 2018; 20(4):518-522. PubMed ID: 30843990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone.
    Ekpo EU; Alakhras M; Brennan P
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 29479948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Missed Breast Cancer: What Can We Learn?
    Wadhwa A; Sullivan JR; Gonyo MB
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2016; 45(6):402-419. PubMed ID: 27079634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strategies to Increase Cancer Detection: Review of True-Positive and False-Negative Results at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening.
    Korhonen KE; Weinstein SP; McDonald ES; Conant EF
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(7):1954-1965. PubMed ID: 27715711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Difficulties and errors in diagnosis of breast neoplasms.
    Giess CS; Frost EP; Birdwell RL
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2012 Aug; 33(4):288-99. PubMed ID: 22824119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiologists’ Performance at Reduced Recall Rates in Mammography: A Laboratory Study.
    Mohd Norsuddin N; Mello-Thoms C; Reed W; Lewis S
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Feb; 20(2):537-543. PubMed ID: 30803217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammographic density and breast cancer screening.
    Bell RJ
    Climacteric; 2020 Oct; 23(5):460-465. PubMed ID: 32643449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of mammographic diagnostic errors in breast clinic.
    Palazzetti V; Guidi F; Ottaviani L; Valeri G; Baldassarre S; Giuseppetti GM
    Radiol Med; 2016 Nov; 121(11):828-833. PubMed ID: 27372707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcome of mammography examination in asymptomatic women.
    Kolade-Yunusa HO; Itanyi UD
    Ann Afr Med; 2021; 20(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 33727513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of computer aided detection in mammography.
    Katzen J; Dodelzon K
    Clin Imaging; 2018; 52():305-309. PubMed ID: 30216858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of malignancy by a radiomic signature from contrast agent-free diffusion MRI in suspicious breast lesions found on screening mammography.
    Bickelhaupt S; Paech D; Kickingereder P; Steudle F; Lederer W; Daniel H; Götz M; Gählert N; Tichy D; Wiesenfarth M; Laun FB; Maier-Hein KH; Schlemmer HP; Bonekamp D
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Aug; 46(2):604-616. PubMed ID: 28152264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retrospective and comparative analysis of (99m)Tc-Sestamibi breast specific gamma imaging versus mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in Chinese women.
    Yu X; Hu G; Zhang Z; Qiu F; Shao X; Wang X; Zhan H; Chen Y; Deng Y; Huang J
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():450. PubMed ID: 27401536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrasound and Clinical Characteristics of False-negative Results in Mammography Screening of Dense Breasts.
    Pu H; Peng J; Xu F; Liu N; Wang F; Huang X; Jia Y
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(4):317-325. PubMed ID: 32229176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Harms of Restrictive Risk-Based Mammographic Breast Cancer Screening.
    Neal CH; Rahman WT; Joe AI; Noroozian M; Pinsky RW; Helvie MA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):228-234. PubMed ID: 29091007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical Utility of a Hand-Held Scanner for Breast Cancer Early Detection and Patient Triage.
    Clanahan JM; Reddy S; Broach RB; Rositch AF; Anderson BO; Wileyto EP; Englander BS; Brooks AD
    JCO Glob Oncol; 2020 Feb; 6():27-34. PubMed ID: 32031433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient, Radiologist, and Examination Characteristics Affecting Screening Mammography Recall Rates in a Large Academic Practice.
    Giess CS; Wang A; Ip IK; Lacson R; Pourjabbar S; Khorasani R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Apr; 16(4 Pt A):411-418. PubMed ID: 30037704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital breast tomosynthesis compared to diagnostic mammographic projections (including magnification) among women recalled at screening mammography: a systematic review for the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC).
    Canelo-Aybar C; Carrera L; Beltrán J; Posso M; Rigau D; Lebeau A; Gräwingholt A; Castells X; Langendam M; Pérez E; Giorgi Rossi P; Van Engen R; Parmelli E; Saz-Parkinson Z; Alonso-Coello P
    Cancer Med; 2021 Apr; 10(7):2191-2204. PubMed ID: 33675147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of mammogram acquisition on the mammographic density and breast cancer association in the Mayo Mammography Health Study cohort.
    Olson JE; Sellers TA; Scott CG; Schueler BA; Brandt KR; Serie DJ; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Morton MJ; Heine JJ; Couch FJ; Pankratz VS; Vachon CM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R147. PubMed ID: 23152984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
    Autier P; Boniol M
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.