These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34729967)

  • 21. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis.
    Hoogewijs MK; de Vliegher SP; Govaere JL; de Schauwer C; de Kruif A; van Soom A
    Equine Vet J; 2012 Sep; 44(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 22150933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of bovine seminal quality assessments using different viewing chambers with a computer-assisted semen analyzer.
    Lenz RW; Kjelland ME; Vonderhaar K; Swannack TM; Moreno JF
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Feb; 89(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 20952528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Current updates on laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of male reproductive failure.
    Sikka SC; Hellstrom WJ
    Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(3):392-401. PubMed ID: 27056346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of commercially available chamber slides for computer-aided analysis of human sperm.
    Dardmeh F; Heidari M; Alipour H
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2021 Apr; 67(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 33375858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples.
    Quinn MM; Jalalian L; Ribeiro S; Ona K; Demirci U; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1388-1393. PubMed ID: 30007319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Automation is the key to standardized semen analysis using the automated SQA-V sperm quality analyzer.
    Agarwal A; Sharma RK
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jan; 87(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 17081526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automated smartphone-based system for measuring sperm viability, DNA fragmentation, and hyaluronic binding assay score.
    Dimitriadis I; L Bormann C; Kanakasabapathy MK; Thirumalaraju P; Kandula H; Yogesh V; Gudipati N; Natarajan V; C Petrozza J; Shafiee H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(3):e0212562. PubMed ID: 30865652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Computerized semen analysis (CASA): effect of semen concentration and chamber depth on measurements.
    Spiropoulos J
    Arch Androl; 2001; 46(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 11204615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Improved sperm kinematics in semen samples collected after 2 h versus 4-7 days of ejaculation abstinence.
    Alipour H; Van Der Horst G; Christiansen OB; Dardmeh F; Jørgensen N; Nielsen HI; Hnida C
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Jul; 32(7):1364-1372. PubMed ID: 28531319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance evaluation of sperm concentration, motility, and morphological analysis for GSA-810 series of sperm quality analysis system.
    Ge YM; Lu JC; Tang SS; Xu YH; Liang YJ
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2023 Dec; 37(23-24):e24986. PubMed ID: 38009489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of a portable device for assessment of motility in stallion semen.
    Buss T; Aurich J; Aurich C
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2019 Mar; 54(3):514-519. PubMed ID: 30592335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computer-aided sperm analysis, the new key player in routine sperm assessment.
    Schubert B; Badiou M; Force A
    Andrologia; 2019 Nov; 51(10):e13417. PubMed ID: 31475742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Quality evaluation of 3 sperm counting chambers by computer-assisted sperm analysis system].
    Cai J; Zeng Y; Song C; Mo ML; Yin B; Lin Q; Huang J
    Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Mar; 15(3):241-3. PubMed ID: 19452697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of LensHooke® X1 PRO and Computer-Assisted Semen Analyzer Compared with Laboratory-Based Manual Semen Analysis.
    Agarwal A; Panner Selvam MK; Ambar RF
    World J Mens Health; 2021 Jul; 39(3):496-505. PubMed ID: 33663026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Impact of age, clinical conditions, and lifestyle on routine semen parameters and sperm kinematics.
    Verón GL; Tissera AD; Bello R; Beltramone F; Estofan G; Molina RI; Vazquez-Levin MH
    Fertil Steril; 2018 Jul; 110(1):68-75.e4. PubMed ID: 29980266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Sperm motility index: a new parameter for human sperm evaluation.
    Bartoov B; Ben-Barak J; Mayevsky A; Sneider M; Yogev L; Lightman A
    Fertil Steril; 1991 Jul; 56(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 2065790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the Sperm Quality Analyzer IIC variables with the computer-aided sperm analysis estimates.
    Suzuki T; Shibahara H; Tsunoda H; Hirano Y; Taneichi A; Obara H; Takamizawa S; Sato I
    Int J Androl; 2002 Feb; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 11869377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The comparison of assessment of pigeon semen motility and sperm concentration by conventional methods and the CASA system (HTM IVOS).
    Klimowicz MD; Nizanski W; Batkowski F; Savic MA
    Theriogenology; 2008 Jul; 70(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 18423566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Impact of seminal trace element and glutathione levels on semen quality of Tunisian infertile men.
    Atig F; Raffa M; Habib BA; Kerkeni A; Saad A; Ajina M
    BMC Urol; 2012 Mar; 12():6. PubMed ID: 22429816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of a novel computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) system using multitarget-tracking algorithms.
    Tomlinson MJ; Pooley K; Simpson T; Newton T; Hopkisson J; Jayaprakasan K; Jayaprakasan R; Naeem A; Pridmore T
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Apr; 93(6):1911-20. PubMed ID: 19200972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.