These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3473039)

  • 21. Radiographical evaluation of the gap at the implant-abutment interface.
    Papavassiliou H; Kourtis S; Katerelou J; Chronopoulos V
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Aug; 22(4):235-50. PubMed ID: 20690952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The determination of scattered radiation from intraoral x-ray examinations and its projected effects on image signal-to-noise ratio.
    Oishi T
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1981 Dec; 23(4):195-211. PubMed ID: 6955456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the response of storage phosphor and film radiography to small variations in X-ray exposure.
    Hildebolt CF; Fletcher G; Yokoyama-Crothers N; Conover GL; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 May; 26(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 9442600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Intraoral digital radiography.
    Alder ME
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):31-5. PubMed ID: 8633303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Techniques for improving dental radiographs.
    Cooley RL; Lubow RM
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1985; 64(6):9-13. PubMed ID: 3867750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Seven ways to achieve quality full-mouth surveys.
    Gomolka KA
    CDS Rev; 2000 Apr; 93(3):34-5. PubMed ID: 11276523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The use of film holding, beam collimating and aiming devices in bitewing radiography. A suggested design for routine and research use.
    Pitts NB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1983; 12(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 6584364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Direct digital extraoral radiography of the head and neck with a solid-state linear x-ray detector.
    McDavid WD; Dove SB; Welander U; Tronje G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Dec; 74(6):811-7. PubMed ID: 1488240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determination of projections for subtraction radiography based on image similarity measurements.
    van der Stelt PF; Ruttimann UE; Webber RL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Aug; 18(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 2700350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system.
    Walker A; Horner K; Czajka J; Shearer AC; Wilson NH
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Jun; 64(762):529-36. PubMed ID: 2070184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A simple means of demonstrating skull fractures using radiographic altered image geometry.
    Wong JK; Blenkinsop B; Chiasson D; Wood RE
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1997 Jun; 15(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 9497751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Decreasing the density of dark radiographs--a lost art.
    Serman NJ; Padilla JF
    N Y State Dent J; 1990 Oct; 56(8):34-5. PubMed ID: 2234690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implementation of acceptability criteria for dental radiology in Belgium.
    Clarijs T
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 23175642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A subjective study of dental diagnostic utility comparing xeroradiography and film radiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 2812719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids.
    Sanderink GC
    Int Dent J; 1993 Aug; 43(4):335-42. PubMed ID: 8276517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A clinical evaluation of proposed panoramic surveys using fine detail imaging. Dental magnification radiography versus rotational panoramic radiography.
    Jensen TW; Eilers G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1983; 12(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 6584365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of two registration techniques for digital subtraction radiography.
    Dunn SM; van der Stelt PF; Ponce A; Fenesy K; Shah S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 May; 22(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 8375559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.
    Anissi HD; Geibel MA
    Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):762-7. PubMed ID: 24648236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative means of dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Rohlin M; White SC
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 1520917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. What's the angle: a study of the angle bisected in intraoral radiography.
    Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980; 49(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 6927946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.