These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34730818)

  • 1. Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Platform for Prostate Cancer Grading and Quantification.
    Huang W; Randhawa R; Jain P; Iczkowski KA; Hu R; Hubbard S; Eickhoff J; Basu H; Roy R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Nov; 4(11):e2132554. PubMed ID: 34730818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer in biopsies: a population-based, diagnostic study.
    Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Solorzano L; Delahunt B; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; van der Kwast TH; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Zhou M; Lindberg J; Lindskog C; Ruusuvuori P; Wählby C; Grönberg H; Rantalainen M; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):222-232. PubMed ID: 31926806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An artificial intelligence algorithm for prostate cancer diagnosis in whole slide images of core needle biopsies: a blinded clinical validation and deployment study.
    Pantanowitz L; Quiroga-Garza GM; Bien L; Heled R; Laifenfeld D; Linhart C; Sandbank J; Albrecht Shach A; Shalev V; Vecsler M; Michelow P; Hazelhurst S; Dhir R
    Lancet Digit Health; 2020 Aug; 2(8):e407-e416. PubMed ID: 33328045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the Use of Combined Artificial Intelligence and Pathologist Assessment to Review and Grade Prostate Biopsies.
    Steiner DF; Nagpal K; Sayres R; Foote DJ; Wedin BD; Pearce A; Cai CJ; Winter SR; Symonds M; Yatziv L; Kapishnikov A; Brown T; Flament-Auvigne I; Tan F; Stumpe MC; Jiang PP; Liu Y; Chen PC; Corrado GS; Terry M; Mermel CH
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2023267. PubMed ID: 33180129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated deep-learning system for Gleason grading of prostate cancer using biopsies: a diagnostic study.
    Bulten W; Pinckaers H; van Boven H; Vink R; de Bel T; van Ginneken B; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Litjens G
    Lancet Oncol; 2020 Feb; 21(2):233-241. PubMed ID: 31926805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Evaluate Performance of a Classifier for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer From Digitized Histopathologic Images.
    Nir G; Karimi D; Goldenberg SL; Fazli L; Skinnider BF; Tavassoli P; Turbin D; Villamil CF; Wang G; Thompson DJS; Black PC; Salcudean SE
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190442. PubMed ID: 30848813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Artificial Intelligence-based Support Tool for Automation and Standardisation of Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies.
    Marginean F; Arvidsson I; Simoulis A; Christian Overgaard N; Åström K; Heyden A; Bjartell A; Krzyzanowska A
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Sep; 7(5):995-1001. PubMed ID: 33303404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists.
    Bulten W; Balkenhol M; Belinga JA; Brilhante A; Çakır A; Egevad L; Eklund M; Farré X; Geronatsiou K; Molinié V; Pereira G; Roy P; Saile G; Salles P; Schaafsma E; Tschui J; Vos AM; ; van Boven H; Vink R; van der Laak J; Hulsbergen-van der Kaa C; Litjens G
    Mod Pathol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):660-671. PubMed ID: 32759979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Biopsy Specimens.
    Nagpal K; Foote D; Tan F; Liu Y; Chen PC; Steiner DF; Manoj N; Olson N; Smith JL; Mohtashamian A; Peterson B; Amin MB; Evans AJ; Sweet JW; Cheung C; van der Kwast T; Sangoi AR; Zhou M; Allan R; Humphrey PA; Hipp JD; Gadepalli K; Corrado GS; Peng LH; Stumpe MC; Mermel CH
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 32701148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study.
    Jung M; Jin MS; Kim C; Lee C; Nikas IP; Park JH; Ryu HS
    Mod Pathol; 2022 Oct; 35(10):1449-1457. PubMed ID: 35487950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of areas of grading difficulties in prostate cancer and comparison with artificial intelligence assisted grading.
    Egevad L; Swanberg D; Delahunt B; Ström P; Kartasalo K; Olsson H; Berney DM; Bostwick DG; Evans AJ; Humphrey PA; Iczkowski KA; Kench JG; Kristiansen G; Leite KRM; McKenney JK; Oxley J; Pan CC; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR; Takahashi H; Tsuzuki T; van der Kwast T; Varma M; Zhou M; Clements M; Eklund M
    Virchows Arch; 2020 Dec; 477(6):777-786. PubMed ID: 32542445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Critical evaluation of artificial intelligence as a digital twin of pathologists for prostate cancer pathology.
    Eminaga O; Abbas M; Kunder C; Tolkach Y; Han R; Brooks JD; Nolley R; Semjonow A; Boegemann M; West R; Long J; Fan RE; Bettendorf O
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):5284. PubMed ID: 38438436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosis and Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer in Biopsies-Current Status and Next Steps.
    Kartasalo K; Bulten W; Delahunt B; Chen PC; Pinckaers H; Olsson H; Ji X; Mulliqi N; Samaratunga H; Tsuzuki T; Lindberg J; Rantalainen M; Wählby C; Litjens G; Ruusuvuori P; Egevad L; Eklund M
    Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Jul; 7(4):687-691. PubMed ID: 34393083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies.
    Lucas M; Jansen I; Savci-Heijink CD; Meijer SL; de Boer OJ; van Leeuwen TG; de Bruin DM; Marquering HA
    Virchows Arch; 2019 Jul; 475(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 31098801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Artificial intelligence-based model for lymph node metastases detection on whole slide images in bladder cancer: a retrospective, multicentre, diagnostic study.
    Wu S; Hong G; Xu A; Zeng H; Chen X; Wang Y; Luo Y; Wu P; Liu C; Jiang N; Dang Q; Yang C; Liu B; Shen R; Chen Z; Liao C; Lin Z; Wang J; Lin T
    Lancet Oncol; 2023 Apr; 24(4):360-370. PubMed ID: 36893772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Artificial intelligence for tumour tissue detection and histological regression grading in oesophageal adenocarcinomas: a retrospective algorithm development and validation study.
    Tolkach Y; Wolgast LM; Damanakis A; Pryalukhin A; Schallenberg S; Hulla W; Eich ML; Schroeder W; Mukhopadhyay A; Fuchs M; Klein S; Bruns C; Büttner R; Gebauer F; Schömig-Markiefka B; Quaas A
    Lancet Digit Health; 2023 May; 5(5):e265-e275. PubMed ID: 37100542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deep Learning-Based Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer From Histopathology Images-Role of Multiscale Decision Aggregation and Data Augmentation.
    Karimi D; Nir G; Fazli L; Black PC; Goldenberg L; Salcudean SE
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2020 May; 24(5):1413-1426. PubMed ID: 31567104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Concordance in Breast Cancer Grading by Artificial Intelligence on Whole Slide Images Compares With a Multi-Institutional Cohort of Breast Pathologists.
    Mantrala S; Ginter PS; Mitkari A; Joshi S; Prabhala H; Ramachandra V; Kini L; Idress R; D'Alfonso TM; Fineberg S; Jaffer S; Sattar AK; Chagpar AB; Wilson P; Singh K; Harigopal M; Koka D
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Nov; 146(11):1369-1377. PubMed ID: 35271701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital Biopsy with Fluorescence Confocal Microscope for Effective Real-time Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Prospective, Comparative Study.
    Rocco B; Sighinolfi MC; Sandri M; Spandri V; Cimadamore A; Volavsek M; Mazzucchelli R; Lopez-Beltran A; Eissa A; Bertoni L; Azzoni P; Reggiani Bonetti L; Maiorana A; Puliatti S; Micali S; Paterlini M; Iseppi A; Rocco F; Pellacani G; Chester J; Bianchi G; Montironi R
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Oct; 4(5):784-791. PubMed ID: 32952095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer histology identification and grading.
    Morozov A; Taratkin M; Bazarkin A; Rivas JG; Puliatti S; Checcucci E; Belenchon IR; Kowalewski KF; Shpikina A; Singla N; Teoh JYC; Kozlov V; Rodler S; Piazza P; Fajkovic H; Yakimov M; Abreu AL; Cacciamani GE; Enikeev D;
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2023 Dec; 26(4):681-692. PubMed ID: 37185992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 56.