180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34731147)
41. Assessment of Changes in the Cesarean Scar and Uterus Between One and Two Years after Cesarean Section Using 3D T2w SPACE MRI.
Qi YF; He YL; Ding N; Ma LK; Qian TY; Li Y; Xue HD; Jin ZY
Chin Med Sci J; 2022 Jun; 37(2):151-158. PubMed ID: 35796339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Cesarean scar defects: an underrecognized cause of abnormal uterine bleeding and other gynecologic complications.
Tower AM; Frishman GN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(5):562-72. PubMed ID: 23680518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Link between cesarean section scar defect and secondary infertility: Case reports and review.
Ahamed FM; Solkar S; Stevikova M; Moya BP
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2023 Mar; 27(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 36107032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Transplantation of human amniotic epithelial cells promotes morphological and functional regeneration in a rat uterine scar model.
Fan Y; Sun J; Zhang Q; Lai D
Stem Cell Res Ther; 2021 Mar; 12(1):207. PubMed ID: 33762002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Risk of Cesarean scar defect following single- vs double-layer uterine closure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Saccone G; McCurdy R; Bujold E; Bifulco G; Berghella V
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 50(5):578-583. PubMed ID: 28070914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Obstetrical outcomes after vaginal repair of caesarean scar diverticula in reproductive-aged women.
Zhou X; Yang X; Chen H; Fang X; Wang X
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Oct; 18(1):407. PubMed ID: 30340551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. "Niche" czyli ubytek w miejscu blizny mięśniówki macicy po cięciu cesarskim - przyczyny, diagnostyka, objawy.
Abacjew-Chmyłko A; Wydra DG; Olszewska H
Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 27306292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Correlation between uterine scar condition and uterine rupture for pregnancy women after previous cesarean section].
Wang LL; Chen JY; Yang HX; Fan LX; Zhang XX; Jing BH; Huang RN; Li C
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):375-380. PubMed ID: 31262121
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Does the appearance of the cutaneous scar after cesarean section reflect the residual myometrial thickness?
Al Naimi A; Mouzakiti N; Eißmann C; Louwen F; Bahlmann F
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Mar; 303(3):847-851. PubMed ID: 33415438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Laparoscopic Resection of Post-Cesarean Section Scar Uterine Cyst.
Jan H; Ghai V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):358-359. PubMed ID: 29704677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Successful surgical treatment of postmyomectomy uterine diverticulum: a case report.
Kawatake R; Maebayashi A; Nishimaki H; Nagaishi M; Kawana K
BMC Womens Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):406. PubMed ID: 37537601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Macrophage polarisation in caesarean scar diverticulum.
Huang J; Liu X; Hou Y; Liu Y; Liao K; Xie N; Deng K
J Clin Pathol; 2023 Jun; 76(6):379-383. PubMed ID: 34980638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Is it necessary to correct a caesarean scar defect before a subsequent pregnancy? A report of three cases.
Szkodziak P; Stępniak A; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak F; Paszkowski T; Woźniak S
J Int Med Res; 2019 May; 47(5):2248-2255. PubMed ID: 30880523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. New diagnostic criteria and operative strategy for cesarean scar syndrome: Endoscopic repair for secondary infertility caused by cesarean scar defect.
Tanimura S; Funamoto H; Hosono T; Shitano Y; Nakashima M; Ametani Y; Nakano T
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1363-9. PubMed ID: 26111547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Feasibility analysis of different surgical methods for uterine cesarean section scar diverticulum.
Zhang Y; Jia Y; Wang X; Sun Q
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1758-1765. PubMed ID: 32567071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature.
Gao L; Huang Z; Zhang X; Zhou N; Huang X; Wang X
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():102-7. PubMed ID: 27014853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Efficacy of Combined Laparoscopic and Hysteroscopic Repair of Post-Cesarean Section Uterine Diverticulum: A Retrospective Analysis.
Li C; Tang S; Gao X; Lin W; Han D; Zhai J; Mo X; Zhou LJ
Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():1765624. PubMed ID: 27066497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparison of the Efficacy of Two Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures Combined with Hysteroscopic Incision in the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Diverticulum.
Peng C; Huang Y; Lu Y; Zhou Y
J Invest Surg; 2022 Jan; 35(1):225-230. PubMed ID: 33059509
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Value and influencing factors of preoperative MRI evaluation for previous cesarean scar defect associated abnormal uterine bleeding in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Zhang Q; Lin C; Wu J; Xu D; Zhu S; Jiang B
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Sept 28; 48(9):1316-1324. PubMed ID: 38044642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Hysterotomy level at Cesarean section and occurrence of large scar defects: a randomized single-blind trial.
Vikhareva O; Rickle GS; Lavesson T; Nedopekina E; Brandell K; Salvesen KÅ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 53(4):438-442. PubMed ID: 30484920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
