These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34731430)

  • 1. Selecting effectively contributes to the mnemonic benefits of self-generated cues.
    Tullis JG; Fraundorf SH
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):765-781. PubMed ID: 34731430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What characteristics make self-generated memory cues effective over time?
    Tullis JG; Finley JR
    Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1308-1319. PubMed ID: 34546833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cueing others' memories.
    Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):634-46. PubMed ID: 25377508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using Self-Generated Cues to Facilitate Recall: A Narrative Review.
    Wheeler RL; Gabbert F
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1830. PubMed ID: 29163254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Generating mnemonics boosts recall of chemistry information.
    Tullis JG; Qiu J
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Mar; 28(1):71-84. PubMed ID: 33939460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Self-referential encoding does not benefit memory for prior remembering across changing contexts.
    Leppanen ML; Navangul AS; Feder GI; Jones DA; Kim K
    Memory; 2021 Oct; 29(9):1176-1185. PubMed ID: 34486932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sans Forgetica is not desirable for learning.
    Geller J; Davis SD; Peterson DJ
    Memory; 2020 Sep; 28(8):957-967. PubMed ID: 32723219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing word fragment completion and cued recall with letter cues.
    Nelson DL; Canas JJ; Bajo MT; Keelean PD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1987 Oct; 13(4):542-52. PubMed ID: 2959738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responsible remembering and forgetting as contributors to memory for important information.
    Murphy DH; Castel AD
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Jul; 49(5):895-911. PubMed ID: 33474691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are test-expectancy effects better explained by changes in encoding strategies or differential test experience?
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):195-207. PubMed ID: 32940510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving Memory Search Through Model-Based Cue Selection.
    Cornell CA; Norman KA; Griffiths TL; Zhang Q
    Psychol Sci; 2024 Jan; 35(1):55-71. PubMed ID: 38175943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.
    Tullis JG; Finley JR; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Apr; 41(3):429-42. PubMed ID: 23242770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making remembering more memorable.
    Leppanen ML; Lyle KB
    Memory; 2018 Aug; 26(7):960-973. PubMed ID: 29291672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age differences in adults' free recall, cued recall, and recognition.
    Perlmutter M
    J Gerontol; 1979 Jul; 34(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 448044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective Cues Mitigate Information Loss in Human Cortex during Working Memory Storage.
    Ester EF; Nouri A; Rodriguez L
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(40):8538-8548. PubMed ID: 30126971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accessing the particular from the general: the power of distinctiveness in the context of organization.
    Hunt RR; Smith RE
    Mem Cognit; 1996 Mar; 24(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 8881324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Examining the relationship between generation constraint and memory.
    McCurdy MP; Frankenstein AN; Sklenar AM; Levy PU; Leshikar ED
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):675-691. PubMed ID: 33415716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Adaptive memory: Is the animacy effect on memory due to richness of encoding?
    Meinhardt MJ; Bell R; Buchner A; Röer JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):416-426. PubMed ID: 31180706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of self-generated cues in early Alzheimer's disease.
    Lipinska B; Bäckman L; Mäntylä T; Viitanen M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Dec; 16(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 7890817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.