These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34731430)

  • 21. Effectiveness of self-generated cues in early Alzheimer's disease.
    Lipinska B; Bäckman L; Mäntylä T; Viitanen M
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1994 Dec; 16(6):809-19. PubMed ID: 7890817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hypermnesia: the role of multiple retrieval cues.
    Otani H; Widner RL; Whiteman HL; St Louis JP
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Sep; 27(5):928-34. PubMed ID: 10540821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigating memory reactivity with a within-participant manipulation of judgments of learning: support for the cue-strengthening hypothesis.
    Rivers ML; Janes JL; Dunlosky J
    Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1342-1353. PubMed ID: 34635008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Age differences in encoding specificity.
    Puglisi JT; Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN
    J Gerontol; 1988 Nov; 43(6):P145-50. PubMed ID: 3183310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Retrieving autobiographical memories: How different retrieval strategies associated with different cues explain reaction time differences.
    Uzer T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():144-50. PubMed ID: 26802518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conflict and metacognitive control: the mismatch-monitoring hypothesis of how others' knowledge states affect recall.
    Fraundorf SH; Benjamin AS
    Memory; 2016 Sep; 24(8):1108-22. PubMed ID: 26247369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting memory benefits in the production effect: the use and misuse of self-generated distinctive cues when making judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; Rhodes MG; Friedman MC
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Jan; 41(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 22915315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Caffeine cravings impair memory and metacognition.
    Palmer MA; Sauer JD; Ling A; Riza J
    Memory; 2017 Oct; 25(9):1225-1234. PubMed ID: 28276980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Self-paced part-list cuing.
    Wallner L; Bäuml KT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2012-2018. PubMed ID: 34244983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of varying cue-load on amnesic and normal cued recall.
    Jackson HF
    Neuropsychologia; 1986; 24(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 3785655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Can you voluntarily forget what you are planning to forget? Behavioral evidence for the underlying truth of the cost-benefit principle.
    Han Z; Yang Y; Zhang Q; Mo L
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1567-1582. PubMed ID: 32318802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mnemonic strategy instruction in coding, processing, and recall of movement-related cues by mentally retarded children.
    Horgan JS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):547-57. PubMed ID: 6634338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How intention to retrieve a memory and expectation that a memory will come to mind influence the retrieval of autobiographical memories.
    Barzykowski K; Niedźwieńska A; Mazzoni G
    Conscious Cogn; 2019 Jul; 72():31-48. PubMed ID: 31078046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Knowing what to remember and forget: a developmental study of cue memory in intentional forgetting.
    Lehman EB; Morath R; Franklin K; Elbaz V
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Sep; 26(5):860-8. PubMed ID: 9796222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. More than a feeling: Emotional cues impact the access and experience of autobiographical memories.
    Sheldon S; Donahue J
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):731-744. PubMed ID: 28244010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can cue familiarity during recall failure prompt illusory recollective experience?
    Huebert AM; McNeely-White KL; Cleary AM
    Mem Cognit; 2022 May; 50(4):681-695. PubMed ID: 34854070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Opening the cuebox: the information children and young adults generate and rely on when making inferences from memory.
    Ruggeri A; Olsson H; Katsikopoulos KV
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2015 Sep; 33(3):355-74. PubMed ID: 26115200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The self-choice effect from a multiple-cue perspective.
    Watanabe T; Soraci SA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):168-72. PubMed ID: 15117004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Organization of emotional memories in autobiographical memory].
    Fijałkowska A; Gruszczyński W
    Psychiatr Pol; 2009; 43(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 19725427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Remindings influence the interpretation of ambiguous stimuli.
    Tullis JG; Braverman M; Ross BH; Benjamin AS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 23835617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.