These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34731442)

  • 1. Revisiting the Open Sampling format: Improving risky choices through a novel graphical representation.
    Tiede KE; Henninger F; Kieslich PJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Apr; 29(2):648-659. PubMed ID: 34731442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How Do People Process Different Representations of Statistical Information? Insights into Cognitive Effort, Representational Inconsistencies, and Individual Differences.
    Tiede KE; Gaissmaier W
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):803-820. PubMed ID: 37842816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Lure of Beauty: People Select Representations of Statistical Information Largely Based on Attractiveness, Not Comprehensibility.
    Gaissmaier W; Tiede KE; Garcia-Retamero R
    Med Decis Making; 2023; 43(7-8):774-788. PubMed ID: 37872798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confidence and risky decision-making in gambling disorder.
    Hoven M; Hirmas A; Engelmann J; van Holst RJ
    J Behav Addict; 2023 Oct; 12(3):840-846. PubMed ID: 37603457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of different graphical and numerical likelihood formats on perception of likelihood and choice.
    Oudhoff JP; Timmermans DR
    Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):487-500. PubMed ID: 25769496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of self-selected short sleep on monetary risk taking.
    Dickinson DL; Brookes J; Ferguson C; Drummond SPA
    J Sleep Res; 2022 Jun; 31(3):e13529. PubMed ID: 34846092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices.
    Hawley ST; Zikmund-Fisher B; Ubel P; Jancovic A; Lucas T; Fagerlin A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2008 Dec; 73(3):448-55. PubMed ID: 18755566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pattern-setting for improving risky decision-making.
    Arfer KB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Jan; 119(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 36519972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informing patients: the influence of numeracy, framing, and format of side effect information on risk perceptions.
    Peters E; Hart PS; Fraenkel L
    Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 21191122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of number line estimation precision and numeracy on risky financial decision making.
    Park I; Cho S
    Int J Psychol; 2019 Aug; 54(4):530-538. PubMed ID: 29318611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of prior risk experiences on subsequent risky decision-making: the role of the insula.
    Xue G; Lu Z; Levin IP; Bechara A
    Neuroimage; 2010 Apr; 50(2):709-16. PubMed ID: 20045470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Natural Frequencies Improve Public Understanding of Medical Test Results: An Experimental Study on Various Bayesian Inference Tasks with Multiple Scoring Methods and Non-Bayesian Reasoning Strategies.
    Kim S
    Med Decis Making; 2024 Nov; 44(8):890-899. PubMed ID: 39291336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A parallel accumulator model accounts for decision randomness when deciding on risky prospects with different expected value.
    Howlett JR; Paulus MP
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0233761. PubMed ID: 32702026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of winning cues and relative payout on choice between simulated slot machines.
    Spetch ML; Madan CR; Liu YS; Ludvig EA
    Addiction; 2020 Sep; 115(9):1719-1727. PubMed ID: 32056323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The description-experience gap in risky choice in nonhuman primates.
    Heilbronner SR; Hayden BY
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):593-600. PubMed ID: 26286883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Greater decision-making competence is associated with greater expected-value sensitivity, but not overall risk taking: an examination of concurrent validity.
    Parker AM; Weller JA
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():717. PubMed ID: 26074857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
    Stacey D; Légaré F; Col NF; Bennett CL; Barry MJ; Eden KB; Holmes-Rovner M; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Lyddiatt A; Thomson R; Trevena L; Wu JH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jan; (1):CD001431. PubMed ID: 24470076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The neural correlates of risky decision making across short and long runs.
    Rao LL; Dunn JC; Zhou Y; Li S
    Sci Rep; 2015 Oct; 5():15831. PubMed ID: 26516095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The neural substrates of probabilistic and intertemporal decision making.
    Weber BJ; Huettel SA
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1234():104-15. PubMed ID: 18710652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Common and distinct electrophysiological correlates of feedback processing during risky and ambiguous decision making.
    Zheng Y; Yi W; Cheng J; Li Q
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Sep; 146():107526. PubMed ID: 32535129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.