BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34731640)

  • 21. A Randomized Comparison of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Hysterectomies: Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Versus Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy.
    Song T; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yun BS; Seong SJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Jul; 25(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 26075931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical indications for hysterectomy route: patient characteristics or physician preference?
    Dorsey JH; Steinberg EP; Holtz PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Nov; 173(5):1452-60. PubMed ID: 7503184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
    Ferrari MM; Berlanda N; Mezzopane R; Ragusa G; Cavallo M; Pardi G
    BJOG; 2000 May; 107(5):620-5. PubMed ID: 10826576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus: operative outcomes and the learning curve.
    Dolanbay M; Kutuk MS; Ozgun MT; Uludag S; Sahin Y
    Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 27304647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
    Johnson N; Barlow D; Lethaby A; Tavender E; Curr E; Garry R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2006 Apr; (2):CD003677. PubMed ID: 16625589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Gasless single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uteri weighing 500g or more.
    Takeda A; Hayashi S; Imoto S; Nakamura H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Aug; 203():239-44. PubMed ID: 27352286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Surgical routes and complications of hysterectomy for benign disorders: a prospective observational study in French university hospitals.
    David-Montefiore E; Rouzier R; Chapron C; Daraï E;
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Jan; 22(1):260-5. PubMed ID: 16950826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A prospective comparison of single-port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy using transumbilical GelPort access and multiport laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Lee JH; Choi JS; Jeon SW; Son CE; Hong JH; Bae JW
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Oct; 158(2):294-7. PubMed ID: 21641107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.
    Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27485234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kongwattanakul K; Khampitak K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2012; 19(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 22133703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Postoperative pain management after minimally invasive hysterectomy: thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia].
    Hensel M; Frenzel J; Späker M; Keil E; Reinhold N
    Anaesthesist; 2013 Oct; 62(10):797-807. PubMed ID: 24057760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
    Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy for large uterus: a comparative study.
    Wang CJ; Yen CF; Lee CL; Tashi T; Soong YK
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Aug; 115(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15262360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.
    Johnson N; Barlow D; Lethaby A; Tavender E; Curr E; Garry R
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Jan; (1):CD003677. PubMed ID: 15674911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vaginal Hysterectomy in a Large Health Maintenance Organization: Retrospective Application of a Clinical Algorithm.
    Buono K; Adams-Piper E; Gokhale K; Li Q; Guaderrama N; Whitcomb EL
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):881-890. PubMed ID: 32810604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of total laparoscopic, vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy.
    Schindlbeck C; Klauser K; Dian D; Janni W; Friese K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Apr; 277(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 17938945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH)--an alternative to total abdominal hysterectomy.
    Polet R; de Jong P; van der Spuy ZM; Shelton M
    S Afr Med J; 1996 Sep; 86(9 Suppl):1190-4. PubMed ID: 9180782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy.
    Shin JW; Lee HH; Lee SP; Park CY
    JSLS; 2011; 15(2):218-21. PubMed ID: 21902979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case-matched study.
    Yang YS; Kim SY; Hur MH; Oh KY
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(4):624-31. PubMed ID: 24462594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Laparoscopic assistance after vaginal hysterectomy and unsuccessful access to the ovaries or failed uterine mobilization: changing trends.
    Sizzi O; Paparella P; Bonito C; Paparella R; Rossetti A
    JSLS; 2004; 8(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 15554277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.