These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34732407)

  • 1. Systematic Reviews and Quality Appraisal of
    Bracher M; Pilkington GJ; Pilkington K
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Nov; 41(11):5377-5391. PubMed ID: 34732407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
    Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Creation of an inventory of quality markers used to evaluate pharmacokinetic literature: A systematic review.
    Soliman ABE; Pawluk SA; Wilby KJ; Rachid O
    J Clin Pharm Ther; 2022 Feb; 47(2):178-183. PubMed ID: 34668592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Methodological quality of systematic reviews comprising clinical practice guidelines for cardiovascular risk assessment and management for noncardiac surgery.
    Jacobsen SM; Douglas A; Smith CA; Roberts W; Ottwell R; Oglesby B; Yasler C; Torgerson T; Hartwell M; Vassar M
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Dec; 127(6):905-916. PubMed ID: 34548174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews.
    O'Donohoe TJ; Bridson TL; Shafik CG; Wynne D; Dhillon RS; Tee JW
    Neurosurgery; 2021 Apr; 88(5):891-899. PubMed ID: 33503659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An AMSTAR assessment of the methodological quality of systematic reviews of oral healthcare interventions published in the Journal of Applied Oral Science (JAOS).
    Sequeira-Byron P; Fedorowicz Z; Jagannath VA; Sharif MO
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011 Oct; 19(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 21986647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perspective on Systematic Medical Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
    Pepose JS; Foulks GN; Nelson JD; Erickson S; Lemp MA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 211():15-21. PubMed ID: 31811861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing the Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Vascular Surgery: PRISMA 2020.
    Antoniou GA; Antoniou SA; Mani K
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2021 Oct; 62(4):664-666. PubMed ID: 34334313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Eligibility criteria in systematic reviews published in prominent medical journals: a methodological review.
    McCrae N; Purssell E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Dec; 21(6):1052-8. PubMed ID: 26370723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Saudi journals from 1997 to 2017.
    Natto ZS; AlGhamdi DS
    Saudi Med J; 2019 May; 40(5):426-431. PubMed ID: 31056617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions.
    Khalil H; Peters MD; Tricco AC; Pollock D; Alexander L; McInerney P; Godfrey CM; Munn Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():156-160. PubMed ID: 33122034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomedical and public health reviews and meta-analyses in Ethiopia had poor methodological quality: overview of evidence from 1970 to 2018.
    Habtewold TD; Alemu SM; Mohammed SH; Endalamaw A; Mohammed MA; Teferra AA; Tura AK; Asefa NG; Tegegne BS
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 May; 109():90-98. PubMed ID: 30721723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems with Early Systematic Reviews: The Case of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Pregnancy.
    Ang XL; Chonkar SP; Chua MSQ; Sulaiman S; Lee JCS
    Matern Child Health J; 2021 Jan; 25(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 33222027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
    Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
    Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The landscape of systematic reviews in urology (1998 to 2015): an assessment of methodological quality.
    Han JL; Gandhi S; Bockoven CG; Narayan VM; Dahm P
    BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):638-649. PubMed ID: 27611722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.