These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34733446)
1. Can longer gaze duration determine risky investment decisions? An interactive perspective. Wang Y; Liu Y J Eye Mov Res; 2021; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 34733446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The timing of gaze-contingent decision prompts influences risky choice. Sui XY; Liu HZ; Rao LL Cognition; 2020 Feb; 195():104077. PubMed ID: 31770670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A dynamic computational model of gaze and choice in multi-attribute decisions. Yang X; Krajbich I Psychol Rev; 2023 Jan; 130(1):52-70. PubMed ID: 35025570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uncovering the computational mechanisms underlying many-alternative choice. Thomas AW; Molter F; Krajbich I Elife; 2021 Apr; 10():. PubMed ID: 33821787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gaze Amplifies Value in Decision Making. Smith SM; Krajbich I Psychol Sci; 2019 Jan; 30(1):116-128. PubMed ID: 30526339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The power of last fixation: Biasing simple choices by gaze-contingent manipulation. Liu HZ; Zhou YB; Wei ZH; Jiang CM Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jul; 208():103106. PubMed ID: 32512321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The dynamics of decision making in risky choice: an eye-tracking analysis. Fiedler S; Glöckner A Front Psychol; 2012; 3():335. PubMed ID: 23162481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of gaze-contingent stimulus elimination on preference judgments. Morii M; Sakagami T Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1351. PubMed ID: 26441727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biasing moral decisions by exploiting the dynamics of eye gaze. Pärnamets P; Johansson P; Hall L; Balkenius C; Spivey MJ; Richardson DC Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Mar; 112(13):4170-5. PubMed ID: 25775604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attention biases the process of risky decision-making: Evidence from eye-tracking. Hu M; Chang R; Sui X; Gao M Psych J; 2024 Apr; 13(2):157-165. PubMed ID: 38155408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The attentional drift-diffusion model extends to simple purchasing decisions. Krajbich I; Lu D; Camerer C; Rangel A Front Psychol; 2012; 3():193. PubMed ID: 22707945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The order of information processing alters economic gain-loss framing effects. Kwak Y; Huettel S Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():46-54. PubMed ID: 29136516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Attentional Drift Diffusion Model of Simple Perceptual Decision-Making. Tavares G; Perona P; Rangel A Front Neurosci; 2017; 11():468. PubMed ID: 28894413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional dynamics of evidence accumulation explain why more numerate people make better decisions under risk. Zilker V Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):18788. PubMed ID: 39138236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A gaze bias with coarse spatial indexing during a gambling task. Zommara NM; Takahashi M; Ounjai K; Lauwereyns J Cogn Neurodyn; 2018 Apr; 12(2):171-181. PubMed ID: 29564026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stimulus exposure and gaze bias: a further test of the gaze cascade model. Glaholt MG; Reingold EM Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Apr; 71(3):445-50. PubMed ID: 19304635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Incomplete Tyranny of Dynamic Stimuli: Gaze Similarity Predicts Response Similarity in Screen-Captured Instructional Videos. Levin DT; Salas JA; Wright AM; Seiffert AE; Carter KE; Little JW Cogn Sci; 2021 Jun; 45(6):e12984. PubMed ID: 34170026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Stacey D; Légaré F; Col NF; Bennett CL; Barry MJ; Eden KB; Holmes-Rovner M; Llewellyn-Thomas H; Lyddiatt A; Thomson R; Trevena L; Wu JH Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jan; (1):CD001431. PubMed ID: 24470076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Shimojo S; Simion C; Shimojo E; Scheier C Nat Neurosci; 2003 Dec; 6(12):1317-22. PubMed ID: 14608360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Gaze characteristics of elite and near-elite athletes in ice hockey defensive tactics. Martell SG; Vickers JN Hum Mov Sci; 2004 Apr; 22(6):689-712. PubMed ID: 15063049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]