These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3473399)

  • 1. Radiographic solution contamination.
    Hardman PK; Tilmon MF; Taylor TS
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jun; 63(6):733-7. PubMed ID: 3473399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Densitometric evaluation of three x-ray films with five different developing solutions.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Tamse A; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 6583629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Densitometric evaluation of four rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Sep; 46(9):467-9. PubMed ID: 1820681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
    Matthee MJ; Becker PJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Base and fog densities of fresh Ektaspeed Plus dental X-ray films.
    Sewerin IP
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1997 Apr; 55(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 9176653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. E-speed dental films processed with rapid chemistry: a comparison with D-speed film.
    Kaffe I; Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Sep; 64(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 3477753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Densitometric evaluation of seven dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Feb; 45(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 2385845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions.
    Akdeniz BG; Lomçali G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9656875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of solution depletion on films developed in the Peri-Pro automatic processor.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jan; 57(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 6582420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of developer depletion on image quality of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus films.
    Casanova MS; Haiter-Neto F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Mar; 33(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 15314003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Densitometric evaluation of intra-oral radiographic film-processing solution combinations.
    Swart TJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 Jul; 44(7):281-3. PubMed ID: 2637510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contamination of dental radiographic solutions.
    Tamburus JR; Pardini LC; Watanabe PC
    Braz Dent J; 1995; 6(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 8688649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of storage conditions on film characteristics of Ektaspeed plus and Ultra-speed films.
    Platin E; Nesbit SP; Ludlow JB
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 130(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 10036844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR; Brand JW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors involved in the high radiographic sensitivity of E-speed films.
    Domon M; Yoshino N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Jan; 69(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 2296442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of developer temperature changes on the sensitometric properties of direct exposure and screen-film imaging systems.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou LS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 Feb; 18(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 2599232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Densitometric evaluation of three intra-oral radiographic films.
    Seeliger JE; Prinsloo JJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 May; 44(5):177-9. PubMed ID: 2635441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microbiologic contamination during dental radiographic film processing.
    Stanczyk DA; Paunovich ED; Broome JC; Fatone MA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Jul; 76(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 8351107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of pH monitoring as a method of processor control.
    Stears JG; Gray JE; Winkler NT
    Radiol Technol; 1979; 50(6):657-63. PubMed ID: 37551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.