These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3473399)

  • 21. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
    Fjellström CA; Fredholm U; Julin P; Rehnmark S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The accuracy of an x-ray film quality-assurance step-wedge test.
    Bloxom RM; Manson-Hing LR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Oct; 62(4):449-58. PubMed ID: 3464919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Densitometric evaluation of intraoral x-ray films: Ektaspeed versus Ultraspeed.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Kuspet ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Mar; 57(3):338-42. PubMed ID: 6584823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
    Hedin M
    Swed Dent J; 1989; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bacterial adherence and contamination during radiographic processing.
    Bachman CE; White JM; Goodis HE; Rosenquist JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 2122350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Radiographic film handling from the viewpoint of economical reuse of fixative solutions].
    Bengel W
    Quintessenz; 1987 Apr; 38(4):715-21. PubMed ID: 3474693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Emulsion clearing characteristics in the processing of dental radiographic films.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1989 May; 18(2):49-52. PubMed ID: 2635118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitometric and archival evaluation of Kodak RA films in dental automatic processing.
    Thunthy KH; Yeadon WR; Winberg R
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Apr; 77(4):427-30. PubMed ID: 8015810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE; Prinsloo NJ; Swart NG
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The evaluation of a clinical thermometer for measuring developer temperature in automatic film processors.
    Wilson WB; Haus AG; Nierman C; Lillie R; Batz T; Moore R
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):823-4. PubMed ID: 8350843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of developer exhaustion on DFL Contrast FV-58 and Kodak Insight dental films.
    de Carvalho FP; da Silveira MM; Frazão MA; de Santana ST; dos Anjos Pontual ML
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):358-61. PubMed ID: 21831975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Ginkel FC; van der Stelt PF
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Densitometric properties of rapid manual processing solutions: abbreviated versus complete rapid processing.
    Geist JR; Gleason MJ
    J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):180-4. PubMed ID: 7673817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Rapid developing of Ektaspeed dental film by increase of temperature.
    Fredholm U; Julin P
    Swed Dent J; 1987; 11(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 3477024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of microbial contamination of radiographic equipment and materials during intraoral imaging procedures.
    Pinheiro SL; Martoni SC; Ogera RR
    Minerva Stomatol; 2012 May; 61(5):197-203. PubMed ID: 22576444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sensitometric evaluation of a new F-speed dental radiographic film.
    Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 11175270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiographic quality control measurements comparing D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
    Diehl R; Gratt BM; Gould RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 3459995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.