These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3473400)

  • 1. A comparative clinical study of group D and E dental film.
    Frommer HH; Jain RK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jun; 63(6):738-42. PubMed ID: 3473400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A subjective study of dental diagnostic utility comparing xeroradiography and film radiography.
    Gratt BM; White SC; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Nov; 68(5):653-60. PubMed ID: 2812719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of E-speed film with added filtration.
    Ponce AZ; McDavid WD; Underhill TE; Morris CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Mar; 61(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 3458135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of the diagnostic advantage of intraoral D and E film for detecting interproximal caries.
    Ardakani FE; Davari A; Goodarzipour D; Goodarzipour K; Fallahzadeh H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):58-70. PubMed ID: 15558091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is E-speed dental film more sensitive to storage than D-speed dental film?
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Nilsson M
    Swed Dent J; 1987; 11(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3480614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing E- and D-speed film: the effects of various storage conditions on fogging.
    Nesbit S; Platin E; Phillips C; Matteson S
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Feb; 126(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 7860889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noise in D- and E-speed radiographic film.
    Southard TE; Southard KA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Jun; 75(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 8515992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A clinical comparison of speed group D and E dental x-ray films.
    Horton PS; Sippy FH; Kohout FJ; Nelson JF; Kienzle GC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Jul; 58(1):104-8. PubMed ID: 6589567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of CCD and CMOS (APS) digital sensors compared with D and E-plus-speed films in the detection of dental pathology: an in vitro study.
    Tsau JN; Mupparapu M
    Penn Dent J (Phila); 2001; 101():10-1. PubMed ID: 15484636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic quality control measurements comparing D-speed film, E-speed film, and xeroradiography.
    Diehl R; Gratt BM; Gould RG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Jun; 61(6):635-40. PubMed ID: 3459995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Clinical and comparative study of the image quality of 3 digital radiographic systems, E-speed film and digitalized film]].
    Bóscolo FN; de Oliveira AE; de Almeida SM; Haiter CF; Haiter Neto F
    Pesqui Odontol Bras; 2001; 15(4):327-33. PubMed ID: 11787321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films using manual and automatic processing solutions.
    Fletcher JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 3468472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of beam collimation on image quality.
    Peterson CA; Mauriello SM; Overman VP; Platin E; Tangen CM
    J Dent Hyg; 1997; 71(2):61-70. PubMed ID: 9470560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitometric comparison of speed group E and F dental radiographic films.
    Geist JR; Brand JW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 11420626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic imaging assessment of experimental intraoral "folded film".
    Ludlow JB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jul; 64(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 3475649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of the sensitometric properties of screen-film systems and conventional dental receptors for intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Staninec M; Chou L
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Dec; 68(6):787-92. PubMed ID: 2594331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. E-speed dental films processed with rapid chemistry: a comparison with D-speed film.
    Kaffe I; Gratt BM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Sep; 64(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 3477753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.