These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34734136)

  • 1. Comparing hyperlordotic and standard lordotic cages for achieving segmental lumbar lordosis during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in adult spinal deformity surgery.
    Mathew J; Cerpa M; Lee NJ; Boddapati V; Marciano G; Sardar ZM; Lenke LG
    J Spine Surg; 2021 Sep; 7(3):318-325. PubMed ID: 34734136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study.
    Kadam A; Wigner N; Saville P; Arlet V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):650-660. PubMed ID: 28960160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does interbody cage lordosis impact actual segmental lordosis achieved in minimally invasive lumbar spine fusion?
    Lovecchio FC; Vaishnav AS; Steinhaus ME; Othman YA; Gang CH; Iyer S; McAnany SJ; Albert TJ; Qureshi SA
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E17. PubMed ID: 32871566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of segmental lumbar lordosis following midline posterior (transforaminal) lumbar interbody fusion: Does interbody device type matter?
    Crawford CH; Epperson TN; Gum JL; Owens RK; Djurasovic M; Glassman SD; Carreon LY
    N Am Spine Soc J; 2022 Sep; 11():100145. PubMed ID: 35990008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does approach matter? A comparative radiographic analysis of spinopelvic parameters in single-level lumbar fusion.
    Ahlquist S; Park HY; Gatto J; Shamie AN; Park DY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1999-2008. PubMed ID: 29631061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lordosis restoration after anterior longitudinal ligament release and placement of lateral hyperlordotic interbody cages during the minimally invasive lateral transpsoas approach: a radiographic study in cadavers.
    Uribe JS; Smith DA; Dakwar E; Baaj AA; Mundis GM; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Akbarnia BA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Nov; 17(5):476-85. PubMed ID: 22938554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic comparison of lordotic and hyperlordotic implants in L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Farber SH; Sagar S; Godzik J; Zhou JJ; Walker CT; Khajavi K; Turner JD; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2022 May; 36(5):775-783. PubMed ID: 34798612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does Lordotic Angle of Cage Determine Lumbar Lordosis in Lumbar Interbody Fusion?
    Hong TH; Cho KJ; Kim YT; Park JW; Seo BH; Kim NC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Jul; 42(13):E775-E780. PubMed ID: 27779605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased cage angle effects on radiographic outcomes after stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Nguyen AQ; Ukogu C; Harvey JP; Federico VP; Nolte MT; Khanna K; Sheha ED; Gandhi SD; Phillips FM
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Aug; 39(2):254-262. PubMed ID: 37148223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expandable cages that expand both height and lordosis provide improved immediate effect on sagittal alignment and short-term clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).
    Jitpakdee K; Sommer F; Gouveia E; Mykolajtchuk C; Boadi B; Berger J; Hussain I; Härtl R
    J Spine Surg; 2024 Mar; 10(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 38567017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Lordotic Versus Non-lordotic Static Interbody Devices in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Longitudinal Comparative Cohort Study.
    Lawless MH; Claus CF; Tong D; Jordan N; Dosanjh A; Hanson CT; Carr DA; Houseman CM
    Cureus; 2022 Jan; 14(1):e21273. PubMed ID: 35178326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lordosis Recreation in Transforaminal and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Cadaveric Study of the Influence of Surgical Bone Resection and Cage Angle.
    Robertson PA; Armstrong WA; Woods DL; Rawlinson JJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):E1350-E1357. PubMed ID: 30383726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do intraoperative radiographs predict final lumbar sagittal alignment following single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Salem KMI; Eranki AP; Paquette S; Boyd M; Street J; Kwon BK; Fisher CG; Dvorak MF
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 May; 28(5):486-491. PubMed ID: 29451437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do Radiographic Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Vary with Cage Position in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Diseases?
    Ding Q; Tang X; Zhang R; Wu H; Liu C
    Orthop Surg; 2022 Apr; 14(4):730-741. PubMed ID: 35302296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do Lordotic Cages Provide Better Segmental Lordosis Versus Nonlordotic Cages in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)?
    Sembrano JN; Horazdovsky RD; Sharma AK; Yson SC; Santos ERG; Polly DW
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 May; 30(4):E338-E343. PubMed ID: 28437335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Segmental Lordosis and Global Spinopelvic Alignment After Single-Level Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Saadeh YS; Joseph JR; Smith BW; Kirsch MJ; Sabbagh AM; Park P
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Jun; 126():e1374-e1378. PubMed ID: 30902780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Technical Consideration for TLIF Cage Retrieval and Deformity Correction With Anterior Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Revision Surgeries.
    Janjua MB; Ackshota N; Arlet V
    Spine Deform; 2019 Jul; 7(4):633-640. PubMed ID: 31202382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion induce lordosis or kyphosis? Radiographic evaluation with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Liu J; Duan P; Mummaneni PV; Xie R; Li B; Dong Y; Berven S; Chou D
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2021 Oct; 35(4):419-426. PubMed ID: 34243159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.