These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34734651)

  • 21. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
    Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. On the joint control of preference by time and reinforcer-ratio variation.
    Davison M; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    Behav Processes; 2013 May; 95():100-12. PubMed ID: 23410902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Four-alternative choice violates the constant-ratio rule.
    Elliffe D; Davison M
    Behav Processes; 2010 May; 84(1):381-9. PubMed ID: 19941942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Suboptimal choice in pigeons: Choice is primarily based on the value of the conditioned reinforcer rather than overall reinforcement rate.
    Smith AP; Zentall TR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2016 Apr; 42(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 26881902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Control by past and present stimuli depends on the discriminated reinforcer differential.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Sep; 108(2):184-203. PubMed ID: 28940396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. On the discriminability of stimulus duration.
    McCarthy D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Mar; 33(2):187-211. PubMed ID: 7365407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.
    Alsop B; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 1940764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in a detection task.
    Alsop B; Porritt M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 16602375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Remembering as discrimination in delayed matching to sample: discriminability and bias.
    Sargisson RJ; White KG
    Learn Behav; 2007 Aug; 35(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 17918423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The interaction of stimulus and reinforcer control in complex temporal discrimination.
    Davison M; McCarthy D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Jul; 48(1):97-116. PubMed ID: 3625105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reinforcer control by comparison-stimulus color and location in a delayed matching-to-sample task.
    Alsop B; Jones BM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 May; 89(3):311-31. PubMed ID: 18540217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Isobias and alloiobias functions in animal psycophysics.
    McCarthy D; Davison M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1984 Jul; 10(3):390-409. PubMed ID: 6747556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Psychophysics of remembering.
    White KG; Wixted JT
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1999 Jan; 71(1):91-113. PubMed ID: 10028693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Learn Behav; 2019 Sep; 47(3):245-257. PubMed ID: 31011893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stimulus discriminability in free-operant and discrete-trial detection procedures.
    McCarthy D; Davison M; Jenkins PE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Mar; 37(2):199-215. PubMed ID: 7069359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reinforcer control and human signal-detection performance.
    Johnstone V; Alsop B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 May; 73(3):275-90. PubMed ID: 10866352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Contingent stimuli signal subsequent reinforcer ratios.
    Boutros N; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Jul; 96(1):39-61. PubMed ID: 21765545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pigeons perform poorly on a midsession reversal task without rigid temporal regularity.
    McMillan N; Sturdy CB; Pisklak JM; Spetch ML
    Anim Cogn; 2016 Jul; 19(4):855-9. PubMed ID: 26886221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.