These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Microleakage of four composite resins over a glass ionomer cement base in Class V restorations. Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Soelberg KB; Bogdan MS Quintessence Int; 1985 Dec; 16(12):817-20. PubMed ID: 3868783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro evaluation of micromarginal leakage of three filling systems--an autoradiographic analysis using radio isotope S35 as a tracer. Mohandas U; Reddy VV J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1993 Mar; 11(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8040699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in-vivo comparison of microleakage of composite resins placed with and without dentin bonding material. Lanning GE; Cochran MA; Swartz ML J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1987; 66(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 2951509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers. Trushkowsky RD; Gwinnett AJ Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations. Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations. Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation. Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation. Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. Payne JH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]