These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3473512)

  • 1. Posterior resins: microleakage below the cementoenamel junction.
    Kanca J
    Quintessence Int; 1987 May; 18(5):347-9. PubMed ID: 3473512
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reducing microleakage with the glass-ionomer/resin sandwich technique.
    Schwartz JL; Anderson MH; Pelleu GB
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):186-92. PubMed ID: 2098728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations after rebonding.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Malone WF
    Compendium; 1987 Sep; 8(8):606-9. PubMed ID: 3315212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of four composite resins over a glass ionomer cement base in Class V restorations.
    Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Soelberg KB; Bogdan MS
    Quintessence Int; 1985 Dec; 16(12):817-20. PubMed ID: 3868783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage pattern of a resin-veneered glass-ionomer cavity liner.
    Crim GA; Shay JS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Sep; 58(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 3305892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro evaluation of micromarginal leakage of three filling systems--an autoradiographic analysis using radio isotope S35 as a tracer.
    Mohandas U; Reddy VV
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1993 Mar; 11(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8040699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An in-vivo comparison of microleakage of composite resins placed with and without dentin bonding material.
    Lanning GE; Cochran MA; Swartz ML
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1987; 66(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 2951509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement composite resin and glass ionomer resin cement.
    Erdilek N; Ozata F; Sepetcioglu F
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(4):311-4. PubMed ID: 9484117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Trushkowsky RD; Gwinnett AJ
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of glass ionomer cement and composite resin restorations in cut non-retentive preparations and pre-existing cervical erosion/abrasion lesions.
    Kaplan I; Harris EF; Mincer HH; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1993 Apr; 73(2):24-8. PubMed ID: 8309244
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
    Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S; Mante MO; Mante FK
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation.
    Dietschi D; De Siebenthal G; Neveu-Rosenstand L; Holz J
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Oct; 26(10):717-27. PubMed ID: 8935115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
    Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations.
    Gross JD; Retief DH; Bradley EL
    Dent Mater; 1985 Feb; 1(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 3894133
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of a two-stage composite resin fill to reduce microleakage below the cementoenamel junction.
    Leclaire CC; Blank LW; Hargrave JW; Pelleu GB
    Oper Dent; 1988; 13(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 3270034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Volumetric microleakage assessment of glass-ionomer-resin composite hybrid materials.
    de Magalhães CS; Serra MC; Rodrigues Júnior AL
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Feb; 30(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 10356563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparative study of microleakage below cemento-enamel junction using light cure and chemically cured glass ionomer cement liners.
    Gupta S; Khinda VI; Grewal N
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2002 Dec; 20(4):158-64. PubMed ID: 12587752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.