These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34735306)

  • 1. Student preference for course approach to pedagogically different methodologies in anatomy and physiology.
    Adams JA; Dewsbury BM
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2022 Mar; 46(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 34735306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Learning style versus time spent studying and career choice: Which is associated with success in a combined undergraduate anatomy and physiology course?
    Farkas GJ; Mazurek E; Marone JR
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016; 9(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 26301828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning in context: Undergraduate students' knowledge and the content retention of anatomy between discipline-specific and integrated course approaches.
    Adams JA; Dewsbury BM; Tanzer JR
    Anat Sci Educ; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38961266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning in an introductory anatomy and physiology course with a diverse student population.
    Brown PJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2010 Sep; 34(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 20826770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Introductory anatomy and physiology in an undergraduate nursing curriculum.
    Brown SJ; White S; Power N
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2017 Mar; 41(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 28143823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An exploration of the factors that contribute to learning satisfaction of first-year anatomy and physiology students.
    Eagleton S
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Sep; 39(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 26330031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are your students ready for anatomy and physiology? Developing tools to identify students at risk for failure.
    Gultice A; Witham A; Kallmeyer R
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Jun; 39(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 26031727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes and satisfaction of two optional cadaveric dissection courses: A 3-year prospective study.
    Pais D; Casal D; Mascarenhas-Lemos L; Barata P; Moxham BJ; Goyri-O'Neill J
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 27483443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What type of learner are your students? Preferred learning styles of undergraduate gross anatomy students according to the index of learning styles questionnaire.
    Quinn MM; Smith T; Kalmar EL; Burgoon JM
    Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):358-365. PubMed ID: 29096042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound-based teaching of cardiac anatomy and physiology to undergraduate medical students.
    Hammoudi N; Arangalage D; Boubrit L; Renaud MC; Isnard R; Collet JP; Cohen A; Duguet A
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013 Oct; 106(10):487-91. PubMed ID: 23911833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The implementation of clay modeling and rat dissection into the human anatomy and physiology curriculum of a large urban community college.
    Haspel C; Motoike HK; Lenchner E
    Anat Sci Educ; 2014; 7(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 23650279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Puzzle-based versus traditional lecture: comparing the effects of pedagogy on academic performance in an undergraduate human anatomy and physiology II lab.
    Stetzik L; Deeter A; Parker J; Yukech C
    BMC Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 15():107. PubMed ID: 26100835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Promoting student engagement and academic achievement in first-year anatomy and physiology courses.
    Reinke NB
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2019 Dec; 43(4):443-450. PubMed ID: 31460774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exploratory study of factors related to educational scores of first preclinical year medical students.
    Sitticharoon C; Srisuma S; Kanavitoon S; Summachiwakij S
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 24585466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Student performance in and perceptions of a high structure undergraduate human anatomy course.
    Shaffer JF
    Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):516-528. PubMed ID: 26990231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring student preferences with a Q-sort: the development of an individualized renal physiology curriculum.
    Roberts JK; Hargett CW; Nagler A; Jakoi E; Lehrich RW
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2015 Sep; 39(3):149-57. PubMed ID: 26330030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a 3D-MC examination format in anatomy.
    Steinborn A; Werner S; März M; Brunk I
    Ann Anat; 2021 Jul; 236():151666. PubMed ID: 33667594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Student learning styles in anatomy and physiology courses: Meeting the needs of nursing students.
    Johnston AN; Hamill J; Barton MJ; Baldwin S; Percival J; Williams-Pritchard G; Salvage-Jones J; Todorovic M
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2015 Nov; 15(6):415-20. PubMed ID: 26027548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are all hands-on activities equally effective? Effect of using plastic models, organ dissections, and virtual dissections on student learning and perceptions.
    Lombardi SA; Hicks RE; Thompson KV; Marbach-Ad G
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2014 Mar; 38(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24585474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Undergraduate basic science preparation for dental school.
    Humphrey SP; Mathews RE; Kaplan AL; Beeman CS
    J Dent Educ; 2002 Nov; 66(11):1252-9. PubMed ID: 12484677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.