75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34735311)
1. Correlation between incidental focal colorectal FDG uptake on PET/CT and colonoscopic and histopathological results.
Albertsen LN; Jaensch C; Tornbjerg SM; Teil J; Madsen AH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2022 Feb; 57(2):246-252. PubMed ID: 34735311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical significance of
Zhang Y; Han J; Li J; Cao J; Zhou Y; Deng S; Zhang B; Yang Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2024 May; 150(5):265. PubMed ID: 38769201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of water enema PET/CT: an effective imaging technique for the diagnosis of incidental colorectal
Zhang R; Abudurexiti M; Qiu W; Huang P; Hu P; Fan W; Zhang Z
BMC Med Imaging; 2024 Jan; 24(1):11. PubMed ID: 38172764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does FDG-PET/CT for incidentally found pulmonary lesions lead to a cascade of more incidental findings?
Sluijter TE; Yakar D; Roest C; Tsoumpas C; Kwee TC
Clin Imaging; 2024 Apr; 108():110116. PubMed ID: 38460254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical significance of incidental colonic 18F-FDG uptake on PET/CT images in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma.
Shim JH; O JH; Oh SI; Yoo HM; Jeon HM; Park CH; Kim SH; Song KY
J Gastrointest Surg; 2012 Oct; 16(10):1847-53. PubMed ID: 22752472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. PET/CT incidental detection of second tumor in patients investigated for pancreatic neoplasms.
Moletta L; Bissoli S; Fantin A; Passuello N; Valmasoni M; Sperti C
BMC Cancer; 2018 May; 18(1):531. PubMed ID: 29728085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Focal colorectal uptake in (18)FDG-PET/CT: maximum standard uptake value as a trigger in a semi-automated screening setting.
Luboldt W; Wiedemann B; Fischer S; Bodelle B; Luboldt HJ; Grünwald F; Vogl TJ
Eur J Med Res; 2016 Jan; 21():2. PubMed ID: 26749430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analyzing the value of delayed 18 F-FDG PET/CT images in diagnosing small colorectal cancer liver metastases in patients with hypothyroidism based on diagnostic accuracy and image standardized uptake value.
Pei Y; Wang Z; Hao S; Tong Y; Wu R; Qiao X; Liu Y; Zhang G
Nucl Med Commun; 2024 May; 45(5):396-405. PubMed ID: 38372033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feasibility of
Hung WT; Liu CJ; Liu YL; Ko KY; Chou SW; Chang HH; Yang YL; Lu MY; Hsu WM
Pediatr Blood Cancer; 2024 Jul; 71(7):e30983. PubMed ID: 38605509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. PET/CT in assessment of colorectal liver metastases: a comprehensive review with emphasis on
Zirakchian Zadeh M
Clin Exp Metastasis; 2023 Dec; 40(6):465-491. PubMed ID: 37682423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical significance of prostate
Chetan MR; Barrett T; Gallagher FA
World J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 9(9):350-358. PubMed ID: 29098068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Focal incidental colorectal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake: Should it be spotlighted?
Lee H; Hwang KH
World J Clin Cases; 2024 May; 12(15):2466-2474. PubMed ID: 38817235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterisation and management of expected and unexpected urgent findings from positron emission tomography with
Liu A; Cain L; Munemo LT; Ahmed R; Kouranos V; Sharma R; Wechalekar K
J Nucl Cardiol; 2024 May; 35():101826. PubMed ID: 38387737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk of malignancy in incidental oropharyngeal lesions exhibiting fluorodeoxyglucose uptake which proceed to tissue biopsy.
Key S; Chia C; Magarey M; Dixon B
ANZ J Surg; 2024 Feb; 94(1-2):122-127. PubMed ID: 38115646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of patients via colonoscopy who underwent positron emission tomography/computerized tomography due to colon involvement.
Ekmen MÖ; Aksoy EK
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(10):e20230409. PubMed ID: 37792869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection: Incidental findings on FDG PET/CT.
Bello Martinez R; Ghesani M; Ghesani N; Gavane S
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Jun; 52(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 33820742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incidental
Chujo K; Norikane T; Murao M; Takami Y; Mitamura K; Yamamoto Y; Fujita H; Nishiyama Y
J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):3579-3582. PubMed ID: 33890185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of PET/Computed Tomography in Gastric and Colorectal Malignancies.
Khandelwal Y; Singh Parihar A; Sistani G; Ramirez-Fort MK; Zukotynski K; Subramaniam RM
PET Clin; 2024 Apr; 19(2):177-186. PubMed ID: 38199915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Difference in arterial FDG accumulation in healthy study participants between digital PET/CT and standard PET/CT.
Nitta N; Yoshimatsu R; Iwasa H; Nakaji K; Miyatake K; Nishimori M; Matsumoto T; Yamanishi T; Yamagami T
Ann Nucl Med; 2024 Feb; 38(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 37851300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Predictors of infectious foci on FDG PET/CT in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.
Ghanem-Zoubi N; Abu-Elhija J; Kagna O; Mustafa-Hellou M; Qasum M; Haber D; Paul M; Keidar Z
Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):14063. PubMed ID: 37640802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
