122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34735365)
1. Effect of Flap Selection on the Postoperative Success of Sacral Pressure Injuries: A Retrospective Analysis.
Şibar S; Findikcioglu K; Guney K; Tuncer S; Ayhan S
Wounds; 2021 Oct; 33(10):271-276. PubMed ID: 34735365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Parasacral Perforator Flaps for Reconstruction of Sacral Pressure Sores.
Lin CT; Chen SY; Chen SG; Tzeng YS; Chang SC
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jul; 75(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 26068420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of gluteal perforator flaps and gluteal fasciocutaneous rotation flaps for reconstruction of sacral pressure sores.
Chen YC; Huang EY; Lin PY
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Mar; 67(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 24476704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of Perforator-Based Fasciocutaneous Flaps for Pressure Sore Reconstruction: Single-Perforator-Based Versus Multiple-Perforator-Based Flaps.
Chih-Hsun L; Ma H
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 40(4):540-8. PubMed ID: 27302416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of mathematically standardized bilobed design perforator flaps for coverage of sacral pressure ulcers.
Özkan B; Albayati A; Tatar BE; Uysal CA
Microsurgery; 2023 Mar; 43(3):229-237. PubMed ID: 36205233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of outcomes of pressure sore reconstructions among perforator flaps, perforator-based rotation fasciocutaneous flaps, and musculocutaneous flaps.
Kuo PJ; Chew KY; Kuo YR; Lin PY
Microsurgery; 2014 Oct; 34(7):547-53. PubMed ID: 24706528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repair of Sacral and Ischial Region Defects With Lateral Sacral Artery Perforator Flaps.
Durgun M; Bas S
Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Mar; 82(3):304-309. PubMed ID: 30633022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Superior gluteal artery perforator flap: a reliable method for sacral pressure ulcer reconstruction.
Khurram MF; Khan AH; Ahmad I; Nanda M; Masoodi Z
J Wound Care; 2013 Dec; 22(12):699-702, 704-5. PubMed ID: 24335894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A reusable perforator-preserving gluteal artery-based rotation fasciocutaneous flap for pressure sore reconstruction.
Lin PY; Kuo YR; Tsai YT
Microsurgery; 2012 Mar; 32(3):189-95. PubMed ID: 22262635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perforator flaps in late-stage pressure sore treatment: outcome analysis of 11-year-long experience with 143 patients.
Grassetti L; Scalise A; Lazzeri D; Carle F; Agostini T; Gesuita R; Di Benedetto G
Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Dec; 73(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 23759968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical effects of superior gluteal artery perforator island flap in repair of sacral pressure ulcer].
Shi CS; Tang XJ; Wang DL; Wei ZR; Wang B; Wu BH; Liu ZY
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi; 2019 May; 35(5):367-370. PubMed ID: 31154735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap for Sacral Pressure Ulcer Reconstruction: A Retrospective Case Study of 11 Patients.
Lin CT; Ou KW; Chiao HY; Wang CY; Chou CY; Chen SG; Lee TP
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Jan; 62(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 26779702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective study: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the outcomes after pressure sores reconstruction with fasciocutaneous, myocutaneous, and perforator flaps.
Chiu YJ; Liao WC; Wang TH; Shih YC; Ma H; Lin CH; Wu SH; Perng CK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1038-1043. PubMed ID: 28552279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reconstruction of a Sacral Pressure Ulcer With an Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap After Failed Reconstruction Using Bilateral V-Y Advancement Flaps.
Wang CY; Wu CJ; Chu TS; Chen CY; Chou CY; Chiao HY; Chang CK; Dai NT
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2018 Feb; 64(2):45-48. PubMed ID: 29481327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clover-Style Fasciocutaneous Perforator Flap for Reconstruction of Massive Sacral Pressure Sores.
Cheng J; Zhang Q; Feng S; Wu X; Huo W; Ma Y; Cai J; Liu M
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jan; 86(1):62-66. PubMed ID: 32487808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of fasciocutaneous V-Y and rotational flaps for defect coverage of sacral pressure sores: a critical single-centre appraisal.
Djedovic G; Metzler J; Morandi EM; Wachter T; Kühn S; Pierer G; Rieger UM
Int Wound J; 2017 Dec; 14(6):945-949. PubMed ID: 28261939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective comparison of perforator and rotation flaps for the closure of extensive Stage IV sacral pressure ulcers.
Fujioka M; Hayashida K; Morooka S; Saijo H
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2014 Apr; 60(4):42-8. PubMed ID: 24706402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reconstruction of Sacral Pressure Ulcer Using a Modified Parasacral Perforator-Based Flap (Maple Leaf Design): An Easier Method for Beginners.
Kyung HW; Ko G; Song SH; Oh SH; Ha Y
Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2021 Dec; 20(4):374-378. PubMed ID: 32524869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Modification of the superior gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of sacral sores.
Lin CT; Chang SC; Chen SG; Tzeng YS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):526-32. PubMed ID: 24480650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modified lumbar artery perforator flaps for gluteal pressure sore reconstruction.
Yoon CS; Yim JH; Kim MH; Ha W; Kim KN
ANZ J Surg; 2017 Dec; 87(12):1035-1039. PubMed ID: 26999425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
