These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34735443)
1. eDNA captures depth partitioning in a kelp forest ecosystem. Monuki K; Barber PH; Gold Z PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0253104. PubMed ID: 34735443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA. Port JA; O'Donnell JL; Romero-Maraccini OC; Leary PR; Litvin SY; Nickols KJ; Yamahara KM; Kelly RP Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(2):527-41. PubMed ID: 26586544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental DNA reveals the fine-grained and hierarchical spatial structure of kelp forest fish communities. Lamy T; Pitz KJ; Chavez FP; Yorke CE; Miller RJ Sci Rep; 2021 Jul; 11(1):14439. PubMed ID: 34262101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Short-lived detection of an introduced vertebrate eDNA signal in a nearshore rocky reef environment. Ely T; Barber PH; Man L; Gold Z PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0245314. PubMed ID: 34086697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of biomonitoring methodologies for surf zone fish communities. Gold Z; Koch MQ; Schooler NK; Emery KA; Dugan JE; Miller RJ; Page HM; Schroeder DM; Hubbard DM; Madden JR; Whitaker SG; Barber PH PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0260903. PubMed ID: 37314989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Large-scale, multidecade monitoring data from kelp forest ecosystems in California and Oregon (USA). Malone DP; Davis K; Lonhart SI; Parsons-Field A; Caselle JE; Carr MH Ecology; 2022 May; 103(5):e3630. PubMed ID: 35048367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effort analysis of Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV) and environmental DNA (eDNA) in monitoring marine ecological communities. Clark AJ; Atkinson SR; Scarponi V; Cane T; Geraldi NR; Hendy IW; Shipway JR; Peck M PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17091. PubMed ID: 38708339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Catchment-based sampling of river eDNA integrates terrestrial and aquatic biodiversity of alpine landscapes. Reji Chacko M; Altermatt F; Fopp F; Guisan A; Keggin T; Lyet A; Rey PL; Richards E; Valentini A; Waldock C; Pellissier L Oecologia; 2023 Aug; 202(4):699-713. PubMed ID: 37558733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using low volume eDNA methods to sample pelagic marine animal assemblages. Dan ME; Portner EJ; Bowman JS; Semmens BX; Owens SM; Greenwald SM; Choy CA PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0303263. PubMed ID: 38748719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomonitoring of marine vertebrates in Monterey Bay using eDNA metabarcoding. Andruszkiewicz EA; Starks HA; Chavez FP; Sassoubre LM; Block BA; Boehm AB PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176343. PubMed ID: 28441466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental DNA metabarcoding reveals distinct fish assemblages supported by seagrass (Zostera marina and Zostera pacifica) beds in different geographic settings in Southern California. Waters T; Gold Z; Obaza A; Ambrose RF; Eagle RA PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0286228. PubMed ID: 37796915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental DNA Metabarcoding: A Novel Method for Biodiversity Monitoring of Marine Fish Communities. Miya M Ann Rev Mar Sci; 2022 Jan; 14():161-185. PubMed ID: 34351788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A large scale temporal and spatial environmental DNA biodiversity survey of marine vertebrates in Brazil following the Fundão tailings dam failure. Lines R; Juggernauth M; Peverley G; Keating J; Simpson T; Mousavi-Derazmahalleh M; Bunce M; Berry TE; Taysom A; Bernardino AF; Whittle P Mar Environ Res; 2023 Nov; 192():106239. PubMed ID: 37926039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring. Jeunen GJ; Cane JS; Ferreira S; Strano F; von Ammon U; Cross H; Day R; Hesseltine S; Ellis K; Urban L; Pearson N; Olmedo-Rojas P; Kardailsky A; Gemmell NJ; Lamare M Mol Ecol Resour; 2023 May; 23(4):771-786. PubMed ID: 36598115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative environmental DNA metabarcoding shows high potential as a novel approach to quantitatively assess fish community. Tsuji S; Inui R; Nakao R; Miyazono S; Saito M; Kono T; Akamatsu Y Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21524. PubMed ID: 36513686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Plumbing the depths with environmental DNA (eDNA): Metabarcoding reveals biodiversity zonation at 45-60 m on mesophotic coral reefs. Hoban ML; Bunce M; Bowen BW Mol Ecol; 2023 Oct; 32(20):5590-5608. PubMed ID: 37728237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spatio-temporal variability of eDNA signal and its implication for fish monitoring in lakes. Hervé A; Domaizon I; Baudoin JM; Dejean T; Gibert P; Jean P; Peroux T; Raymond JC; Valentini A; Vautier M; Logez M PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0272660. PubMed ID: 35960745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An integrated spatio-temporal view of riverine biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding. Perry WB; Seymour M; Orsini L; Jâms IB; Milner N; Edwards F; Harvey R; de Bruyn M; Bista I; Walsh K; Emmett B; Blackman R; Altermatt F; Lawson Handley L; Mächler E; Deiner K; Bik HM; Carvalho G; Colbourne J; Cosby BJ; Durance I; Creer S Nat Commun; 2024 May; 15(1):4372. PubMed ID: 38782932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fishing for fish environmental DNA: Ecological applications, methodological considerations, surveying designs, and ways forward. Yao M; Zhang S; Lu Q; Chen X; Zhang SY; Kong Y; Zhao J Mol Ecol; 2022 Oct; 31(20):5132-5164. PubMed ID: 35972241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]