These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34735942)

  • 1. Machine learning-based statistical analysis for early stage detection of cervical cancer.
    Ali MM; Ahmed K; Bui FM; Paul BK; Ibrahim SM; Quinn JMW; Moni MA
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Dec; 139():104985. PubMed ID: 34735942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of precancerous cervical cancer lesions among women living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in Uganda: a comparison of supervised machine learning algorithms.
    Namalinzi F; Galadima KR; Nalwanga R; Sekitoleko I; Uwimbabazi LFR
    BMC Womens Health; 2024 Jul; 24(1):393. PubMed ID: 38978015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Heart disease prediction using supervised machine learning algorithms: Performance analysis and comparison.
    Ali MM; Paul BK; Ahmed K; Bui FM; Quinn JMW; Moni MA
    Comput Biol Med; 2021 Sep; 136():104672. PubMed ID: 34315030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction and Detection of Cervical Malignancy Using Machine Learning Models.
    Devi S; Gaikwad SR; R H
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2023 Apr; 24(4):1419-1433. PubMed ID: 37116167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of image analysis and machine learning techniques for automated cervical cancer screening from pap-smear images.
    William W; Ware A; Basaza-Ejiri AH; Obungoloch J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Oct; 164():15-22. PubMed ID: 30195423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical Cancer Identification with Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique and PCA Analysis using Random Forest Classifier.
    Geetha R; Sivasubramanian S; Kaliappan M; Vimal S; Annamalai S
    J Med Syst; 2019 Jul; 43(9):286. PubMed ID: 31312985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Classifying of Home Discharge Possibility in Convalescent Stroke Patients: A Secondary Analysis.
    Imura T; Toda H; Iwamoto Y; Inagawa T; Imada N; Tanaka R; Inoue Y; Araki H; Araki O
    J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2021 Oct; 30(10):106011. PubMed ID: 34325274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of Machine Learning Techniques for Traffic Flow-Based Intrusion Detection.
    Rodríguez M; Alesanco Á; Mehavilla L; García J
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 Nov; 22(23):. PubMed ID: 36502028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Model for Predicting Cervical Cancer Using Machine Learning Algorithms.
    Al Mudawi N; Alazeb A
    Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(11):. PubMed ID: 35684753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soft Clustering for Enhancing the Diagnosis of Chronic Diseases over Machine Learning Algorithms.
    Aldhyani THH; Alshebami AS; Alzahrani MY
    J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():4984967. PubMed ID: 32211144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced cervical precancerous lesions detection and classification using Archimedes Optimization Algorithm with transfer learning.
    Allogmani AS; Mohamed RM; Al-Shibly NM; Ragab M
    Sci Rep; 2024 May; 14(1):12076. PubMed ID: 38802525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating Cervical Risk Factors that Lead to Cytological and Biopsy Examination.
    Sindiani AM; Alshdaifat EH; Alkhatib AJ
    Med Arch; 2020 Aug; 74(4):294-297. PubMed ID: 33041448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and validation of a prognostic model for cervical cancer by combination of machine learning and high-throughput sequencing.
    Shi R; Chang L; Shi L; Zhang Z; Zhang L; Li X
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Apr; 50(4):108241. PubMed ID: 38452717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of weka-based classification algorithms on medical diagnosis datasets.
    Dou Y; Meng W
    Technol Health Care; 2023; 31(S1):397-408. PubMed ID: 37066939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dataset meta-level and statistical features affect machine learning performance.
    Uddin S; Lu H
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1670. PubMed ID: 38238551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Classification of cancer cells using computational analysis of dynamic morphology.
    Hasan MR; Hassan N; Khan R; Kim YT; Iqbal SM
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Mar; 156():105-112. PubMed ID: 29428061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hybrid Model for Detection of Cervical Cancer Using Causal Analysis and Machine Learning Techniques.
    Lilhore UK; Poongodi M; Kaur A; Simaiya S; Algarni AD; Elmannai H; Vijayakumar V; Tunze GB; Hamdi M
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():4688327. PubMed ID: 35572826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of supervised machine learning classification techniques in prediction of locoregional recurrences in early oral tongue cancer.
    Alabi RO; Elmusrati M; Sawazaki-Calone I; Kowalski LP; Haglund C; Coletta RD; Mäkitie AA; Salo T; Almangush A; Leivo I
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Apr; 136():104068. PubMed ID: 31923822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ensemble of heterogeneous classifiers for diagnosis and prediction of coronary artery disease with reduced feature subset.
    Velusamy D; Ramasamy K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Jan; 198():105770. PubMed ID: 33027698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.
    Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Beigzadeh A
    Technol Health Care; 2016; 24(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 26409558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.