These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34736025)

  • 1. An approach to evaluating and benchmarking the mechanical behavior of a surgical mesh prototype designed for the repair of abdominal wall defects.
    García-García C; Carrascal-Morillo MT; Castell Gómez JT; Bernal Guerrero C; García Prada JC
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Jan; 125():104909. PubMed ID: 34736025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anisotropic evaluation of synthetic surgical meshes.
    Saberski ER; Orenstein SB; Novitsky YW
    Hernia; 2011 Feb; 15(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 20882394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical behaviour of synthetic surgical meshes: finite element simulation of the herniated abdominal wall.
    Hernández-Gascón B; Peña E; Melero H; Pascual G; Doblaré M; Ginebra MP; Bellón JM; Calvo B
    Acta Biomater; 2011 Nov; 7(11):3905-13. PubMed ID: 21763794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biaxial analysis of synthetic scaffolds for hernia repair demonstrates variability in mechanical anisotropy, non-linearity and hysteresis.
    Deeken CR; Thompson DM; Castile RM; Lake SP
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Oct; 38():6-16. PubMed ID: 24997427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mechanical properties of the abdominal wall and biomaterials utilized for hernia repair.
    Deeken CR; Lake SP
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Oct; 74():411-427. PubMed ID: 28692907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Combined in vivo and ex vivo analysis of mesh mechanics in a porcine hernia model.
    Kahan LG; Lake SP; McAllister JM; Tan WH; Yu J; Thompson D; Brunt LM; Blatnik JA
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):820-830. PubMed ID: 28733734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biaxial Mechanical Evaluation of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Synthetic Surgical Meshes Used for Hernia Repair: Physiological Loads Modify Anisotropy Response.
    Cordero A; Hernández-Gascón B; Pascual G; Bellón JM; Calvo B; Peña E
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Jul; 44(7):2181-8. PubMed ID: 26620778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical compatibility of surgical mesh and fascia being reinforced: dependence of experimental hernia defect repair results on anisotropic surgical mesh positioning.
    Anurov MV; Titkova SM; Oettinger AP
    Hernia; 2012 Apr; 16(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 21909779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical behavior of surgical meshes for abdominal wall repair: In vivo versus biaxial characterization.
    Simón-Allué R; Ortillés A; Calvo B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2018 Jun; 82():102-111. PubMed ID: 29579555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Synthetic surgical meshes used in abdominal wall surgery: Part II-Biomechanical aspects.
    Todros S; Pavan PG; Pachera P; Natali AN
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2017 May; 105(4):892-903. PubMed ID: 26687728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Resorbable Synthetic Meshes for Abdominal Wall Defects in Preclinical Setting: A Literature Review.
    Miserez M; Jairam AP; Boersema GSA; Bayon Y; Jeekel J; Lange JF
    J Surg Res; 2019 May; 237():67-75. PubMed ID: 30710881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histologic and biomechanical evaluation of a novel macroporous polytetrafluoroethylene knit mesh compared to lightweight and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in a porcine model of ventral incisional hernia repair.
    Melman L; Jenkins ED; Hamilton NA; Bender LC; Brodt MD; Deeken CR; Greco SC; Frisella MM; Matthews BD
    Hernia; 2011 Aug; 15(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 21279663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of position of light mesh endoprosthesis with anisotropic structure for the efficiency of anterior abdominal wall reconstruction.
    Anurov MV; Titkova SM; Oettinger AP
    Bull Exp Biol Med; 2010 Oct; 149(4):440-4. PubMed ID: 21234439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pore size and pore shape--but not mesh density--alter the mechanical strength of tissue ingrowth and host tissue response to synthetic mesh materials in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair.
    Lake SP; Ray S; Zihni AM; Thompson DM; Gluckstein J; Deeken CR
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2015 Feb; 42():186-97. PubMed ID: 25486631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term anisotropic mechanical response of surgical meshes used to repair abdominal wall defects.
    Hernández-Gascón B; Peña E; Pascual G; Rodríguez M; Bellón JM; Calvo B
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jan; 5(1):257-71. PubMed ID: 22100101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Promotion of Hernia Repair with High-Strength, Flexible, and Bioresorbable Silk Fibroin Mesh in a Large Abdominal Hernia Model.
    Zhang W; Li Y; Jiang D; Xie S; Zeng M; Chen J; Chen L; Ouyang H; Zou X
    ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2018 Jun; 4(6):2067-2080. PubMed ID: 33445278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prostheses size dependency of the mechanical response of the herniated human abdomen.
    Simón-Allué R; Hernández-Gascón B; Lèoty L; Bellón JM; Peña E; Calvo B
    Hernia; 2016 Dec; 20(6):839-848. PubMed ID: 27550441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing meshes in a computer model of a laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.
    Qandeel H; Chew C; Tanner KE; O'Dwyer PJ
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):4124-4128. PubMed ID: 34528129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One-year outcome of biological and synthetic bioabsorbable meshes for augmentation of large abdominal wall defects in a rabbit model.
    Peeters E; van Barneveld KW; Schreinemacher MH; De Hertogh G; Ozog Y; Bouvy N; Miserez M
    J Surg Res; 2013 Apr; 180(2):274-83. PubMed ID: 23481559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical and histological evaluation of abdominal wall compliance with intraperitoneal onlay mesh implants in rabbits: a comparison of six different state-of-the-art meshes.
    Konerding MA; Chantereau P; Delventhal V; Holste JL; Ackermann M
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Sep; 34(7):806-16. PubMed ID: 21992970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.