220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34736035)
1. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review.
Azadi A; Marchand G; Masoud AT; Sainz K; Govindan M; Ware K; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Ostergard DR
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():90-98. PubMed ID: 34736035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
Meriwether KV; Balk EM; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):505-522. PubMed ID: 30741318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
Geoffrion R; Larouche M
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Porcari I; Zorzato PC; Bosco M; Garzon S; Magni F; Salvatore S; Franchi MP; Uccella S
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):173-189. PubMed ID: 38269852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Gan ZS; Roberson DS; Smith AL
Curr Urol Rep; 2022 Sep; 23(9):175-183. PubMed ID: 35789456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Uterine-preserving POP surgery.
Gutman R; Maher C
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1803-13. PubMed ID: 24142056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sacrospinous hysteropexy - an alternative in primary surgical treatment of apical compartment prolapse.
Homola Prokop; Hensel Germund; Košťál Milan
Ceska Gynekol; 2021; 86(3):200-204. PubMed ID: 34167313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study.
Milani R; Manodoro S; Cola A; Bellante N; Palmieri S; Frigerio M
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 31848662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Oliveira SA; Fonseca MCM; Bortolini MAT; Girão MJBC; Roque MT; Castro RA
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1617-1630. PubMed ID: 28780651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines].
Cayrac M; Warembourg S; Le Normand L; Fatton B
Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vaginal hysteropexy compared with vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A 5-year cost-effectiveness Markov model.
Wallace SL; Syan R; Lee K; Sokol ER
BJOG; 2024 Feb; 131(3):362-371. PubMed ID: 37667669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Uterus-Sparing Surgery: Outcomes of Transvaginal Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy.
Aserlind A; Garcia AN; Medina CA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32387566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
