These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34736035)

  • 1. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review.
    Azadi A; Marchand G; Masoud AT; Sainz K; Govindan M; Ware K; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Ostergard DR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():90-98. PubMed ID: 34736035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Balk EM; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):505-522. PubMed ID: 30741318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.
    Kapoor S; Sivanesan K; Robertson JA; Veerasingham M; Kapoor V
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1285-1294. PubMed ID: 28258346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinician perspectives on hysterectomy versus uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Porcari I; Zorzato PC; Bosco M; Garzon S; Magni F; Salvatore S; Franchi MP; Uccella S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jul; 166(1):173-189. PubMed ID: 38269852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
    Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Gan ZS; Roberson DS; Smith AL
    Curr Urol Rep; 2022 Sep; 23(9):175-183. PubMed ID: 35789456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women.
    Maher C; Feiner B; Baessler K; Schmid C
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Apr; (4):CD004014. PubMed ID: 23633316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Uterine-preserving POP surgery.
    Gutman R; Maher C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Nov; 24(11):1803-13. PubMed ID: 24142056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sacrospinous hysteropexy - an alternative in primary surgical treatment of apical compartment prolapse.
    Homola Prokop; Hensel Germund; Košťál Milan
    Ceska Gynekol; 2021; 86(3):200-204. PubMed ID: 34167313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hysterectomy versus uterine preservation for pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a prospective cohort study.
    Brennand EA; Scime NV; Huang B; Edwards AD; Kim-Fine S; Hall J; Birch C; Robert M; Carter Ramirez A;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 39428029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
    Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study.
    Milani R; Manodoro S; Cola A; Bellante N; Palmieri S; Frigerio M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 31848662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Oliveira SA; Fonseca MCM; Bortolini MAT; Girão MJBC; Roque MT; Castro RA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1617-1630. PubMed ID: 28780651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines].
    Cayrac M; Warembourg S; Le Normand L; Fatton B
    Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vaginal hysteropexy compared with vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A 5-year cost-effectiveness Markov model.
    Wallace SL; Syan R; Lee K; Sokol ER
    BJOG; 2024 Feb; 131(3):362-371. PubMed ID: 37667669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.