These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34737872)

  • 1. The Twenty Item Prosopagnosia Index (PI20) provides meaningful evidence of face recognition impairment.
    Tsantani M; Vestner T; Cook R
    R Soc Open Sci; 2021 Nov; 8(11):202062. PubMed ID: 34737872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The 20-item prosopagnosia index (PI20): a self-report instrument for identifying developmental prosopagnosia.
    Shah P; Gaule A; Sowden S; Bird G; Cook R
    R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Jun; 2(6):140343. PubMed ID: 26543567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robust associations between the 20-item prosopagnosia index and the Cambridge Face Memory Test in the general population.
    Gray KL; Bird G; Cook R
    R Soc Open Sci; 2017 Mar; 4(3):160923. PubMed ID: 28405380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 20 item prosopagnosia index (PI20): relationship with the Glasgow face-matching test.
    Shah P; Sowden S; Gaule A; Catmur C; Bird G
    R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Nov; 2(11):150305. PubMed ID: 26715995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship between face recognition ability and anxiety tendencies in healthy young individuals: A prosopagnosia index and state-trait anxiety inventory study.
    Oishi Y; Aruga K; Kurita K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2024 May; 245():104237. PubMed ID: 38537601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Danish Version of the 20-Item Prosopagnosia Index (PI20): Translation, Validation and a Link to Face Perception.
    Nørkær E; Guðbjörnsdóttir E; Roest SB; Shah P; Gerlach C; Starrfelt R
    Brain Sci; 2023 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36831880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do people have insight into their face recognition abilities?
    Palermo R; Rossion B; Rhodes G; Laguesse R; Tez T; Hall B; Albonico A; Malaspina M; Daini R; Irons J; Al-Janabi S; Taylor LC; Rivolta D; McKone E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Feb; 70(2):218-233. PubMed ID: 26935244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Associations between self-reported and objective face recognition abilities are only evident in above- and below-average recognisers.
    Estudillo AJ; Wong HK
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e10629. PubMed ID: 33510971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-reported face recognition is highly valid, but alone is not highly discriminative of prosopagnosia-level performance on objective assessments.
    Arizpe JM; Saad E; Douglas AO; Germine L; Wilmer JB; DeGutis JM
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1102-1116. PubMed ID: 30761463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new way of classifying developmental prosopagnosia: Balanced Integration Score.
    Lowes J; Hancock PJB; Bobak AK
    Cortex; 2024 Mar; 172():159-184. PubMed ID: 38330779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impaired perception of facial emotion in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Biotti F; Cook R
    Cortex; 2016 Aug; 81():126-36. PubMed ID: 27208814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Alcohol Use Predicts Face Perception Impairments and Difficulties in Face Recognition.
    Dal Lago D; Burns E; Gaunt E; Peers E; Jackson RC; Wilcockson TDW
    Subst Use Misuse; 2023; 58(13):1734-1741. PubMed ID: 37602741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. People with and without prosopagnosia have insight into their face recognition ability.
    Livingston LA; Shah P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 May; 71(5):1260-1262. PubMed ID: 28513322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face Perception and Test Reliabilities in Congenital Prosopagnosia in Seven Tests.
    Esins J; Schultz J; Stemper C; Kennerknecht I; Bülthoff I
    Iperception; 2016; 7(1):2041669515625797. PubMed ID: 27482369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reading in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence for a dissociation between word and face recognition.
    Starrfelt R; Klargaard SK; Petersen A; Gerlach C
    Neuropsychology; 2018 Feb; 32(2):138-147. PubMed ID: 29528680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does developmental prosopagnosia impair identification of other-ethnicity faces?
    Cenac Z; Biotti F; Gray KLH; Cook R
    Cortex; 2019 Oct; 119():12-19. PubMed ID: 31071553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A family at risk: congenital prosopagnosia, poor face recognition and visuoperceptual deficits within one family.
    Johnen A; Schmukle SC; Hüttenbrink J; Kischka C; Kennerknecht I; Dobel C
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 58():52-63. PubMed ID: 24704175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. People have modest, not good, insight into their face recognition ability: a comparison between self-report questionnaires.
    Matsuyoshi D; Watanabe K
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1713-1723. PubMed ID: 32436049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normal and abnormal face selectivity of the M170 response in developmental prosopagnosics.
    Harris AM; Duchaine BC; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(14):2125-36. PubMed ID: 16243056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.