134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34738142)
1. The intraoral permeability measurement as a screening for artifact formation by orthodontic products in MRI.
Blankenstein FH; Kielburg U; Melerowitz L; Stelmaszczyk D
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jul; 84(4):252-263. PubMed ID: 34738142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies.
Ozawa E; Honda EI; Parakonthun KN; Ohmori H; Shimazaki K; Kurabayashi T; Ono T
Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 29457192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein FH; Asbach P; Beuer F; Glienke J; Mayer S; Zachriat C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):281-289. PubMed ID: 26984824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein F; Truong BT; Thomas A; Thieme N; Zachriat C
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Jan; 76(1):14-29. PubMed ID: 25420942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Metal objects of the head and neck region in magnetic resonance imaging : Survey among radiologists].
Kielburg U; Blankenstein FH
Radiologe; 2019 Oct; 59(10):906-911. PubMed ID: 31444511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article.
Dobai A; Dembrovszky F; Vízkelety T; Barsi P; Juhász F; Dobó-Nagy C
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):298. PubMed ID: 35854295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MRI with intraoral orthodontic appliance-a comparative in vitro and in vivo study of image artefacts at 1.5 T.
Zachriat C; Asbach P; Blankenstein KI; Peroz I; Blankenstein FH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(6):20140416. PubMed ID: 25734243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic capability of magnetic resonance imaging in the head and neck region: A systematic review.
Hasanin M; Kaplan SEF; Hohlen B; Lai C; Nagshabandi R; Zhu X; Al-Jewair T
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 31285157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: A preliminary study.
Neela PK; Tatikonda VK; Syed MW; Mamillapalli PK; Sesham VM; Keesara S
Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 34905303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images of the head.
Zhylich D; Krishnan P; Muthusami P; Rayner T; Shroff M; Doria A; Tompson B; Lou W; Suri S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):484-499. PubMed ID: 28257733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Should the orthodontic brackets always be removed prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?
Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir A; Rahmati-Kamel M
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2016; 6(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 27195213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects.
Costa AL; Appenzeller S; Yasuda CL; Pereira FR; Zanardi VA; Cendes F
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2009 Jun; 14(6):E278-82. PubMed ID: 19300375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging.
Wylezinska M; Pinkstone M; Hay N; Scott AD; Birch MJ; Miquel ME
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 25667040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Induced magnetic moment in stainless steel components of orthodontic appliances in 1.5 T MRI scanners.
Wang ZJ; Rollins NK; Liang H; Park YJ
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5871-8. PubMed ID: 26429261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments].
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Orthod Fr; 2017 Jun; 88(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of Severe Arterial Phase Respiratory Motion Artifact on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI - Assessment of Interrater Agreement and Reliability.
Ringe KI; Luetkens JA; Fimmers R; Hammerstingl RM; Layer G; Maurer MH; Nähle CP; Michalik S; Reimer P; Schraml C; Schreyer AG; Stumpp P; Vogl TJ; Wacker FK; Willinek W; Kukuk GM
Rofo; 2018 Apr; 190(4):341-347. PubMed ID: 29448290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MSVAT-SPACE-STIR and SEMAC-STIR for Reduction of Metallic Artifacts in 3T Head and Neck MRI.
Hilgenfeld T; Prager M; Schwindling FS; Nittka M; Rammelsberg P; Bendszus M; Heiland S; Juerchott A
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Jul; 39(7):1322-1329. PubMed ID: 29794233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance imaging of the inferior alveolar nerve with special regard to metal artifact reduction.
Probst M; Richter V; Weitz J; Kirschke JS; Ganter C; Troeltzsch M; Nittka M; Cornelius CP; Zimmer C; Probst FA
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 45(4):558-569. PubMed ID: 28238561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
