BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34738192)

  • 1. The Effect of Price Changes and Teaspoon Labelling on Intention to Purchase Sugar-Sweetened Beverages: A Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Vo V; Nguyen KH; Whitty JA; Comans TA
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2022 Mar; 20(2):199-212. PubMed ID: 34738192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of sugar-sweetened beverage price increases and educational messages on beverage purchasing behavior among adults.
    Blake MR; Lancsar E; Peeters A; Backholer K
    Appetite; 2018 Jul; 126():156-162. PubMed ID: 29627346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health.
    von Philipsborn P; Stratil JM; Burns J; Busert LK; Pfadenhauer LM; Polus S; Holzapfel C; Hauner H; Rehfuess E
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Jun; 6(6):CD012292. PubMed ID: 31194900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in sugar-sweetened beverage purchases across the price distribution after the implementation of a tax in Mexico: a before-and-after analysis.
    Salgado Hernández JC; Ng SW; Colchero MA
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):265. PubMed ID: 36750794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chile's 2014 sugar-sweetened beverage tax and changes in prices and purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages: An observational study in an urban environment.
    Caro JC; Corvalán C; Reyes M; Silva A; Popkin B; Taillie LS
    PLoS Med; 2018 Jul; 15(7):e1002597. PubMed ID: 29969444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patterns of beverage purchases amongst British households: A latent class analysis.
    Berger N; Cummins S; Allen A; Smith RD; Cornelsen L
    PLoS Med; 2020 Sep; 17(9):e1003245. PubMed ID: 32898152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are price discounts on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) linked to household SSB purchases? - a cross-sectional study in a large US household and retail scanner database.
    Zhong Y; Auchincloss AH; Stehr MF; Langellier BA
    Nutr J; 2021 Mar; 20(1):29. PubMed ID: 33740986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characteristics Associated With Purchasing Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Bottled Water Among US Households, 2015.
    Ghazaryan A; Park S; Onufrak SJ; Carlson AC; Rhone A; Roy K
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2024 Jan; 124(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 37648023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ethics of excise taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages.
    Falbe J
    Physiol Behav; 2020 Oct; 225():113105. PubMed ID: 32712210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: A before-and-after study.
    Silver LD; Ng SW; Ryan-Ibarra S; Taillie LS; Induni M; Miles DR; Poti JM; Popkin BM
    PLoS Med; 2017 Apr; 14(4):e1002283. PubMed ID: 28419108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sugar-sweetened beverage price elasticities in a hypothetical convenience store.
    Blake MR; Lancsar E; Peeters A; Backholer K
    Soc Sci Med; 2019 Mar; 225():98-107. PubMed ID: 30822609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Removal of sugar sweetened beverages from sale in a hospital setting-Consumer opinion and influence on purchasing behavior.
    Tinney M; Rittinger R; Tomlinson K; Borg D; Warzel A; O'Sullivan M; Nyanhanda T
    Health Promot J Austr; 2022 Jul; 33(3):677-685. PubMed ID: 34767662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association of a Sweetened Beverage Tax With Purchases of Beverages and High-Sugar Foods at Independent Stores in Philadelphia.
    Bleich SN; Dunn CG; Soto MJ; Yan J; Gibson LA; Lawman HG; Mitra N; Lowery CM; Peterhans A; Hua SV; Roberto CA
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Jun; 4(6):e2113527. PubMed ID: 34129022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Secular trends and customer characteristics of sweetened beverage and water purchasing at US convenience and other small food stores, 2014-2017.
    Winkler MR; Lenk K; Erickson D; Laska MN
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2022 Mar; 19(1):37. PubMed ID: 35361242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of price and nutrition labelling on sugary drink purchases: Results from an experimental marketplace study.
    Acton RB; Hammond D
    Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():129-137. PubMed ID: 29146460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Targeted Beverage Taxes Influence Food and Beverage Purchases among Households with Preschool Children.
    Ford CN; Ng SW; Popkin BM
    J Nutr; 2015 Aug; 145(8):1835-43. PubMed ID: 26063069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. U.S. Households' Children's Drink Purchases: 2006-2017 Trends and Associations With Marketing.
    Choi YY; Andreyeva T; Fleming-Milici F; Harris JL
    Am J Prev Med; 2022 Jan; 62(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 34922654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association Between Student Purchases of Beverages During the School Commute and In-School Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages, San Francisco Bay Area, 2013.
    Grummon AH; Oliva A; Hampton KE; Patel AI
    Prev Chronic Dis; 2015 Dec; 12():E220. PubMed ID: 26679489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of sugar-sweetened beverage front-of-pack labels on drink selection, health knowledge and awareness: An online randomised controlled trial.
    Billich N; Blake MR; Backholer K; Cobcroft M; Li V; Peeters A
    Appetite; 2018 Sep; 128():233-241. PubMed ID: 29879450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linking a sugar-sweetened beverage tax with fruit and vegetable subsidies: A simulation analysis of the impact on the poor.
    Valizadeh P; Popkin BM; Ng SW
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2022 Jan; 115(1):244-255. PubMed ID: 34610088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.