233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34739539)
1. Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Tumor Grade, Stage, and Margin Status Does Not Independently Influence the Likelihood of Biochemical Recurrence in Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.
Kryvenko ON; Iakymenko OA; De Lima Guido LP; Bhattu AS; Merhe A; Mouzannar A; Briski LM; Oymagil I; Lugo I; Nemov I; Ritch CR; Kava BR; Punnen S; Jorda M; Parekh DJ; Gonzalgo ML
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Aug; 146(8):1012-1017. PubMed ID: 34739539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and tumor volume predict adverse pathological stage and margin status at radical prostatectomy in grade Group 2 and grade Group 3 prostate cancers.
Iakymenko OA; Lugo I; Briski LM; Nemov I; Punnen S; Kwon D; Pollack A; Stoyanova R; Parekh DJ; Jorda M; Gonzalgo ML; Kryvenko ON
Prostate; 2021 Sep; 81(12):866-873. PubMed ID: 34184782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Cancer Grade and Tumor Volume Does Not Have an Independent Effect on Adverse Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes Compared to Usual Acinar Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.
Iakymenko OA; Lugo I; Kwon D; Zhao W; Hayee A; Punnen S; Parekh DJ; Pollack A; Ritch CR; Gonzalgo ML; Stoyanova R; Jorda M; Kryvenko ON
Urology; 2020 Mar; 137():108-114. PubMed ID: 31711982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathologic stage of prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma at radical prostatectomy: effect of percentage of the ductal component and associated grade of acinar adenocarcinoma.
Amin A; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Apr; 35(4):615-9. PubMed ID: 21383610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: the role of prognostic grade group and index tumor nodule.
Vau N; Henriques V; Cheng L; Blanca A; Fonseca J; Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Lopez-Beltran A
Hum Pathol; 2019 Nov; 93():6-15. PubMed ID: 31442520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma with cribriform architecture has worse prognostic features than non-cribriform-type.
Au S; Villamil CF; Alaghehbandan R; Wang G
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2019 Apr; 39():59-62. PubMed ID: 30772651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate Carcinoma Grade and Length But Not Cribriform Architecture at Positive Surgical Margins Are Predictive for Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Hollemans E; Verhoef EI; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Helleman J; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44(2):191-197. PubMed ID: 31592799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The pathway of isolated seminal vesicle invasion has a different impact on biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy.
Galosi AB; Milanese G; Montesi L; Cimadamore A; Franzese C; Palagonia E; Chiacchio G; Castellani D
Urol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 41(6):293.e9-293.e14. PubMed ID: 37142452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. High Gleason grade carcinoma at a positive surgical margin predicts biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and may guide adjuvant radiotherapy.
Savdie R; Horvath LG; Benito RP; Rasiah KK; Haynes AM; Chatfield M; Stricker PD; Turner JJ; Delprado W; Henshall SM; Sutherland RL; Kench JG
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(12):1794-800. PubMed ID: 21992536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma variant predicts worse pathological and oncological outcomes: Insight from over 1000 consecutive patients from a large prospective uro-oncology registry.
Tan YG; Khalid F; Huang HH; Chen K; Tay KJ; Lau WKO; Cheng CWS; Ngo NT; Yuen JSP
Prostate; 2021 Mar; 81(4):242-251. PubMed ID: 33428259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining the cut-off values of tumor diameter, degree of extraprostatic extension, and extent of surgical margin positivity with regard to biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Kir G; Arikan EA; Seneldir H; Ankarali H; Oznergiz S; Olgun ZC; Yildirim A
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2020 Feb; 44():151431. PubMed ID: 31837592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis.
Hollemans E; Verhoef EI; Bangma CH; Rietbergen J; Helleman J; Roobol MJ; van Leenders GJLH
Mod Pathol; 2019 Jan; 32(1):139-146. PubMed ID: 30349027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seminal vesicle involvement after radical prostatectomy: predicting risk factors for progression.
Salomon L; Anastasiadis AG; Johnson CW; McKiernan JM; Goluboff ET; Abbou CC; Olsson CA; Benson MC
Urology; 2003 Aug; 62(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 12893340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of positive surgical margin length and Gleason grade at the margin on oncologic outcomes in patients with nonorgan-confined prostate cancer.
Preisser F; Heinze A; S Abrams-Pompe R; Budäus L; Chun FK; Graefen M; Huland H; Tilki D
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(9):949-956. PubMed ID: 35344221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevalence of adverse pathology features in grade group 2 prostatectomy specimens with syn- or metachronous metastatic disease.
Ma C; Downes M; Jain R; Ientilucci M; Fleshner N; Perlis N; van der Kwast T
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):345-351. PubMed ID: 34878188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characteristics of positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy, open retropubic radical prostatectomy, and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a comparative histopathologic study from a single academic center.
Albadine R; Hyndman ME; Chaux A; Jeong JY; Saab S; Tavora F; Epstein JI; Gonzalgo ML; Pavlovich CP; Netto GJ
Hum Pathol; 2012 Feb; 43(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21820147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of patient age on biochemical recurrence rates following radical prostatectomy.
Magheli A; Rais-Bahrami S; Humphreys EB; Peck HJ; Trock BJ; Gonzalgo ML
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):1933-7; discussion 1937-8. PubMed ID: 17868723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
