206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34740449)
1. Artificial Intelligence in Liver Transplantation.
Khorsandi SE; Hardgrave HJ; Osborn T; Klutts G; Nigh J; Spencer-Cole RT; Kakos CD; Anastasiou I; Mavros MN; Giorgakis E
Transplant Proc; 2021 Dec; 53(10):2939-2944. PubMed ID: 34740449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Artificial intelligence and organ transplantation: challenges and expectations.
Briceño J
Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2020 Aug; 25(4):393-398. PubMed ID: 32487888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial intelligence for predicting survival following deceased donor liver transplantation: Retrospective multi-center study.
Yu YD; Lee KS; Man Kim J; Ryu JH; Lee JG; Lee KW; Kim BW; Kim DS;
Int J Surg; 2022 Sep; 105():106838. PubMed ID: 36028137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Crossroads in Liver Transplantation: Is Artificial Intelligence the Key to Donor-Recipient Matching?
Calleja Lozano R; Hervás Martínez C; Briceño Delgado FJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Nov; 58(12):. PubMed ID: 36556945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial intelligence and liver transplantation: Looking for the best donor-recipient pairing.
Briceño J; Calleja R; Hervás C
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2022 Aug; 21(4):347-353. PubMed ID: 35321836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine-learning algorithms for predicting results in liver transplantation: the problem of donor-recipient matching.
Briceño J; Ayllón MD; Ciria R
Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2020 Aug; 25(4):406-411. PubMed ID: 32487891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Use of artificial intelligence as an innovative donor-recipient matching model for liver transplantation: results from a multicenter Spanish study.
Briceño J; Cruz-Ramírez M; Prieto M; Navasa M; Ortiz de Urbina J; Orti R; Gómez-Bravo MÁ; Otero A; Varo E; Tomé S; Clemente G; Bañares R; Bárcena R; Cuervas-Mons V; Solórzano G; Vinaixa C; Rubín A; Colmenero J; Valdivieso A; Ciria R; Hervás-Martínez C; de la Mata M
J Hepatol; 2014 Nov; 61(5):1020-8. PubMed ID: 24905493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Artificial neural network and bioavailability of the immunosuppression drug.
Naushad SM; Kutala VK
Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2020 Aug; 25(4):435-441. PubMed ID: 32452906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Donor-recipient matching in adult liver transplantation: Current status and advances.
Accardo C; Vella I; Pagano D; di Francesco F; Li Petri S; Calamia S; Bonsignore P; Tropea A; Gruttadauria S
Biosci Trends; 2023 Jul; 17(3):203-210. PubMed ID: 37344395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Artificial Intelligence: Present and Future Potential for Solid Organ Transplantation.
Peloso A; Moeckli B; Delaune V; Oldani G; Andres A; Compagnon P
Transpl Int; 2022; 35():10640. PubMed ID: 35859667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using Artificial Intelligence for Predicting Survival of Individual Grafts in Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review.
Wingfield LR; Ceresa C; Thorogood S; Fleuriot J; Knight S
Liver Transpl; 2020 Jul; 26(7):922-934. PubMed ID: 32274856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting patient survival after liver transplantation using evolutionary multi-objective artificial neural networks.
Cruz-Ramírez M; Hervás-Martínez C; Fernández JC; Briceño J; de la Mata M
Artif Intell Med; 2013 May; 58(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 23489761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The current state of artificial intelligence in cardiac transplantation.
Goswami R
Curr Opin Organ Transplant; 2021 Jun; 26(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 33938466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers.
Regnier-Coudert O; McCall J; Lothian R; Lam T; McClinton S; N'dow J
Artif Intell Med; 2012 May; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22206941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usage and comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms for determination of growth and development by cervical vertebrae stages in orthodontics.
Kök H; Acilar AM; İzgi MS
Prog Orthod; 2019 Nov; 20(1):41. PubMed ID: 31728776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamically weighted evolutionary ordinal neural network for solving an imbalanced liver transplantation problem.
Dorado-Moreno M; Pérez-Ortiz M; Gutiérrez PA; Ciria R; Briceño J; Hervás-Martínez C
Artif Intell Med; 2017 Mar; 77():1-11. PubMed ID: 28545607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting the Kidney Graft Survival Using Optimized African Buffalo-Based Artificial Neural Network.
Chawla R; Balaji S; Alabdali RN; Naguib IA; Hamed NO; Zahran HY
J Healthc Eng; 2022; 2022():6503714. PubMed ID: 35607394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning in liver transplantation.
Bhat M; Rabindranath M; Chara BS; Simonetto DA
J Hepatol; 2023 Jun; 78(6):1216-1233. PubMed ID: 37208107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Novel Deep Learning Model as a Donor-Recipient Matching Tool to Predict Survival after Liver Transplantation.
Börner N; Schoenberg MB; Pöschke P; Heiliger C; Jacob S; Koch D; Pöllmann B; Drefs M; Koliogiannis D; Böhm C; Karcz KW; Werner J; Guba M
J Clin Med; 2022 Oct; 11(21):. PubMed ID: 36362649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for fuzzy classification in survival prediction.
Jiménez F; Sánchez G; Juárez JM
Artif Intell Med; 2014 Mar; 60(3):197-219. PubMed ID: 24525210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
