172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34741734)
61. Miniaturized extraction methods of triclosan from aqueous and fish roe samples. Bioconcentration studies in zebrafish larvae (Danio rerio).
Gonzalo-Lumbreras R; Sanz-Landaluze J; Guinea J; Cámara C
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2012 May; 403(4):927-37. PubMed ID: 22297856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Updated knowledge, partitioning and ecological risk of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in global aquatic environments.
Chaves MJS; Kulzer J; Pujol de Lima PDR; Barbosa SC; Primel EG
Environ Sci Process Impacts; 2022 Nov; 24(11):1982-2008. PubMed ID: 36124562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Occurrence of Levonorgestrel in Water Systems and Its Effects on Aquatic Organisms: A Review.
Oropesa AL; Guimarães L
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2021; 254():57-84. PubMed ID: 32494900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Degradation of triclosan by environmental microbial consortia and by axenic cultures of microorganisms with concerns to wastewater treatment.
Chen X; Zhuang J; Bester K
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jul; 102(13):5403-5417. PubMed ID: 29732474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Prevalence of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in the urban wastewater treatment systems of Dehradun, India: Daunting presence of Estrone.
Silori R; Kumar M; Madhab Mahapatra D; Biswas P; Prakash Vellanki B; Mahlknecht J; Mohammad Tauseef S; Barcelo D
Environ Res; 2023 Oct; 235():116673. PubMed ID: 37454796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Neurotoxic mechanisms of triclosan: The antimicrobial agent emerging as a toxicant.
Pullaguri N; Umale A; Bhargava A
J Biochem Mol Toxicol; 2023 Feb; 37(2):e23244. PubMed ID: 36353933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Hypothesis-driven weight-of-evidence analysis of endocrine disruption potential: a case study with triclosan.
Mihaich E; Capdevielle M; Urbach-Ross D; Slezak B
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2017 Apr; 47(4):263-285. PubMed ID: 28128023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Development of aquatic life criteria for triclosan and comparison of the sensitivity between native and non-native species.
Wang XN; Liu ZT; Yan ZG; Zhang C; Wang WL; Zhou JL; Pei SW
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Sep; 260():1017-22. PubMed ID: 23892169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Occurrence of emerging organic contaminants and endocrine disruptors in different water compartments in Mexico - A review.
Vázquez-Tapia I; Salazar-Martínez T; Acosta-Castro M; Meléndez-Castolo KA; Mahlknecht J; Cervantes-Avilés P; Capparelli MV; Mora A
Chemosphere; 2022 Dec; 308(Pt 1):136285. PubMed ID: 36057353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Oxidative removal of selected endocrine-disruptors and pharmaceuticals in drinking water treatment systems, and identification of degradation products of triclosan.
Wu Q; Shi H; Adams CD; Timmons T; Ma Y
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Nov; 439():18-25. PubMed ID: 23059968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Effects of 4-MBC and triclosan in embryos of the frog Pelophylax perezi.
Martins D; Monteiro MS; Soares AM; Quintaneiro C
Chemosphere; 2017 Jul; 178():325-332. PubMed ID: 28334672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Occurrence of triclosan, triclocarban, and its lesser chlorinated congeners in Minnesota freshwater sediments collected near wastewater treatment plants.
Venkatesan AK; Pycke BF; Barber LB; Lee KE; Halden RU
J Hazard Mater; 2012 Aug; 229-230():29-35. PubMed ID: 22742731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the aquatic environment in China: a review.
Bu Q; Wang B; Huang J; Deng S; Yu G
J Hazard Mater; 2013 Nov; 262():189-211. PubMed ID: 24036145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Predicting accurate and ecologically relevant regional scale concentrations of triclosan in rivers for use in higher-tier aquatic risk assessments.
Price OR; Williams RJ; van Egmond R; Wilkinson MJ; Whelan MJ
Environ Int; 2010 Aug; 36(6):521-6. PubMed ID: 20439114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Uptake and subcellular distribution of triclosan in typical hydrophytes under hydroponic conditions.
He Y; Nie E; Li C; Ye Q; Wang H
Environ Pollut; 2017 Jan; 220(Pt A):400-406. PubMed ID: 27692886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The pH-dependent toxicity of triclosan to five aquatic organisms (Daphnia magna, Photobacterium phosphoreum, Danio rerio, Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri, and Carassius auratus).
Li C; Qu R; Chen J; Zhang S; Allam AA; Ajarem J; Wang Z
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Apr; 25(10):9636-9646. PubMed ID: 29363032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Toxicological responses, bioaccumulation, and metabolic fate of triclosan in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.
Wang XD; Lu YC; Xiong XH; Yuan Y; Lu LX; Liu YJ; Mao JH; Xiao WW
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Apr; 27(10):11246-11259. PubMed ID: 31960244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. First nationwide investigation and environmental risk assessment of 72 pharmaceuticals and personal care products from Sri Lankan surface waterways.
Guruge KS; Goswami P; Tanoue R; Nomiyama K; Wijesekara RGS; Dharmaratne TS
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Nov; 690():683-695. PubMed ID: 31301508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Assessment of ecological hazards and environmental fate of disinfectant quaternary ammonium compounds.
DeLeo PC; Huynh C; Pattanayek M; Schmid KC; Pechacek N
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2020 Dec; 206():111116. PubMed ID: 32890921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. GC-MS analysis and ecotoxicological risk assessment of triclosan, carbamazepine and parabens in Indian rivers.
Ramaswamy BR; Shanmugam G; Velu G; Rengarajan B; Larsson DG
J Hazard Mater; 2011 Feb; 186(2-3):1586-93. PubMed ID: 21216531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
