These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34741907)

  • 21. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel hybrid reconstruction plate for mandible segmental defects: A finite element analysis and fatigue testing.
    Wu CH; Lin YS; Liu YS; Lin CL
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Oct; 45(10):1671-1680. PubMed ID: 28838835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The comparison between various methods of mandibular reconstruction based on finite element analysis.
    Parvan M; Khaghaninejad MS; Karimi MT
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Apr; 238(4):423-429. PubMed ID: 38415325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finite element analysis of customized reconstruction plates for mandibular continuity defect therapy.
    Narra N; Valášek J; Hannula M; Marcián P; Sándor GK; Hyttinen J; Wolff J
    J Biomech; 2014 Jan; 47(1):264-8. PubMed ID: 24290177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Finite element analysis and clinical application of 3D-printed Ti alloy implant for the reconstruction of mandibular defects.
    Xue R; Lai Q; Xing H; Zhong C; Zhao Y; Zhu K; Deng Y; Liu C
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Jan; 24(1):95. PubMed ID: 38233785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Which plate results in better stability after segmental mandibular resection and fibula free flap reconstruction? Biomechanical analysis.
    Park SM; Lee JW; Noh G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2018 Nov; 126(5):380-389. PubMed ID: 30126810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Biomechanical and Mechanostat analysis of a titanium layered porous implant for mandibular reconstruction: The effect of the topology optimization design.
    Peng WM; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Nizza M; Baur DA; Jiang XF; Dong XT
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 May; 124():112056. PubMed ID: 33947550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanical behavior of mandibles reconstructed with fibular grafts at different vertical positions using finite element method.
    Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang JH; Jun JC; Jiang XF; Wang R; Baur DA
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):281-289. PubMed ID: 30482534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical analysis of fixation methods for bone flap repositioning after lateral orbitotomy approach: A finite element analysis.
    Sang Z; Ren Z; Yu J; Wang Y; Liao H
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Oct; 125(5S2):101938. PubMed ID: 38851586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical considerations of semi-anatomic glass fiber-reinforced (GFRC) composite implant for mandibular segmental defects: A technical note.
    Väisänen A; Hoikkala N; Härkönen V; Moritz N; Vallittu PK
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Aug; 156():106604. PubMed ID: 38810543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Stress tests of reconstruction plates for bridging mandibular angle defects].
    Knoll WD; Gaida A; Maurer P
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2004 Jul; 8(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 15293119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimal design of an individual endoprosthesis for the reconstruction of extensive mandibular defects with finite element analysis.
    Li P; Shen L; Li J; Liang R; Tian W; Tang W
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 23541861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biomechanics of alloplastic mandible reconstruction using biomaterials: The effect of implant design on stress concentration influences choice of material.
    Prasadh S; Suresh S; Hong KL; Bhargav A; Rosa V; Wong RCW
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Mar; 103():103548. PubMed ID: 31783282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Computational models and their applications in biomechanical analysis of mandibular reconstruction surgery.
    Aftabi H; Zaraska K; Eghbal A; McGregor S; Prisman E; Hodgson A; Fels S
    Comput Biol Med; 2024 Feb; 169():107887. PubMed ID: 38160502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 3D-FEM and histomorphology of mandibular reconstruction with the titanium functionally dynamic bridging plate.
    Schuller-Götzburg P; Pleschberger M; Rammerstorfer FG; Krenkel C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1298-305. PubMed ID: 19828292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. CAD-CAM plates versus conventional fixation plates for primary mandibular reconstruction: A biomechanical in vitro analysis.
    Rendenbach C; Sellenschloh K; Gerbig L; Morlock MM; Beck-Broichsitter B; Smeets R; Heiland M; Huber G; Hanken H
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 45(11):1878-1883. PubMed ID: 28943180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical analysis of titanium fixation plates and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
    Atik F; Atac MS; Özkan A; Kilinc Y; Arslan M
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2016; 19(3):386-90. PubMed ID: 27022805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Failure location prediction by finite element analysis for an additive manufactured mandible implant.
    Huo J; Dérand P; Rännar LE; Hirsch JM; Gamstedt EK
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Sep; 37(9):862-9. PubMed ID: 26227805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A mechanical study of novel additive manufactured modular mandible fracture fixation plates - Preliminary Study with finite element analysis.
    Pałka Ł; Kuryło P; Klekiel T; Pruszyński P
    Injury; 2020 Jul; 51(7):1527-1535. PubMed ID: 32362448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stability of the permanently bent plates used in mandibular reconstructive surgery.
    Si-Myung Park ; Deukhee Lee ; Jung-Woo Lee ; Youngjun Kim ; Laehyun Kim ; Gunwoo Noh
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():2198-2201. PubMed ID: 28268767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Finite element analysis of customized implant in mandibular reconstruction after tumor resection with and without using customized surgical osteotomy guide.
    Dahake S; Kuthe A; Kulkarni S; Mawale M
    Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 28868631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.