These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34742831)
1. The influence of crown coverage on the accuracy of static guided implant surgery in partially edentulous models: An in vitro study. Wang ZY; Chao JR; Zheng JW; You M; Liu Y; Shen JF J Dent; 2021 Dec; 115():103882. PubMed ID: 34742831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fixation Pins Increase the Accuracy of Implant Surgery in Free-End Models: An In Vitro Study. Chen X; Yang Z; Wang Y; Fu G J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 May; 81(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 36716792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study. Taheri Otaghsara SS; Joda T; Thieringer FM J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery. El Kholy K; Lazarin R; Janner SFM; Faerber K; Buser R; Buser D Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Nov; 30(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 31381178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant placement by using fully guided versus partially guided tissue-supported surgical guides with cylindrical versus C-shaped guiding holes: A split-mouth clinical study. Sarhan MM; Khamis MM; El-Sharkawy AM J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Apr; 125(4):620-627. PubMed ID: 32389377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. Chai J; Liu X; Schweyen R; Setz J; Pan S; Liu J; Zhou Y BMC Oral Health; 2020 Oct; 20(1):288. PubMed ID: 33087073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In Vivo Tooth-Supported Implant Surgical Guides Fabricated With Desktop Stereolithographic Printers: Fully Guided Surgery Is More Accurate Than Partially Guided Surgery. Bencharit S; Staffen A; Yeung M; Whitley D; Laskin DM; Deeb GR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Jul; 76(7):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 29550378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery in partially edentulous patients and possible influencing factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Putra RH; Yoda N; Astuti ER; Sasaki K J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Jan; 66(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 33504723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of Different Surgical Guide Designs for Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: An In Vitro Study. Wu YT; Papaspyridakos P; Kang K; Finkelman M; Kudara Y; De Souza AB J Oral Implantol; 2022 Oct; 48(5):351-357. PubMed ID: 34937081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of dental implant placement with 3D-printed surgical templates by using Implant Studio and MGUIDE. An observational study. Fotopoulos I; Lillis T; Panagiotidou E; Kapagiannidis I; Nazaroglou I; Dabarakis N Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Sep; 25(3):249-256. PubMed ID: 35072419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques. Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study. Kivovics M; Takács A; Pénzes D; Németh O; Mijiritsky E J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104070. PubMed ID: 35183695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does guided level (fully or partially) influence implant placement accuracy at post-extraction sockets and healed sites? An in vitro study. Chen Z; Li J; Ceolin Meneghetti P; Galli M; Mendonça G; Wang HL Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Aug; 26(8):5449-5458. PubMed ID: 35499656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of alveolar ridge morphology and guide-hole design on the accuracy of static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery with two implant macro-designs: An in vitro study. Dulla FA; Couso-Queiruga E; Chappuis V; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S; Raabe C J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104426. PubMed ID: 36652971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of intraoral scanning coverage on the accuracy of digital implant impressions - An in vitro study. Wang ZY; Gong Y; Liu F; Chen D; Zheng JW; Shen JF J Dent; 2024 Apr; 143():104929. PubMed ID: 38458380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical accuracy of partially guided implant placement in edentulous patients: A computed tomography-based retrospective study. Wang B; Yang J; Siow L; Wang Y; Zhang X; Zhou Y; Yu M; Wang H Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 37814971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computer-assisted implant surgery? An in vitro study. Takács A; Marada G; Turzó K; Nagy Á; Németh O; Mijiritsky E; Kivovics M; Mühl A BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):575. PubMed ID: 37596610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]