BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34742945)

  • 1. Hysterectomy Versus Uterine Preservation at the Time of Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.
    Wang R; Tunitsky-Bitton E; Ramaseshan AS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2022 Apr; 44(4):359-364. PubMed ID: 34742945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
    Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
    Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complications of obliterative versus reconstructive vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in octogenarians: A retrospective cohort study.
    Coleman CEM; Bonasia K; Pascali D; Clancy A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2024 Jun; 43(5):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 38511609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy with concomitant pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Luchristt D; Kenton K; Bretschneider CE
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov; 33(11):3005-3011. PubMed ID: 35020034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Major postoperative complications following surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse: a secondary database analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Erekson E; Murchison RL; Gerjevic KA; Meljen VT; Strohbehn K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):608.e1-608.e17. PubMed ID: 28578172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Addressing apical support during hysterectomy for prolapse: a NSQIP review.
    Hill AM; Pauls RN; Crisp CC
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Jul; 31(7):1349-1355. PubMed ID: 32242277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perioperative adverse events associated with colpocleisis for uterovaginal and posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse.
    Hill AJ; Walters MD; Unger CA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):501.e1-501.e6. PubMed ID: 26529371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 30-Day Readmission After Same-Day Compared With Next-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 135(6):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 32459424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statewide geographic variation in hysterectomy approach for pelvic organ prolapse: a county-level analysis.
    Latack KR; Moniz M; Hong CX; Schmidt P; Malone A; Kamdar N; Madden B; Pizzo CA; Thompson MP; Morgan DM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Sep; 229(3):320.e1-320.e7. PubMed ID: 37244455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Apical suspension is underutilized for repair of stage IV pelvic organ prolapse: an analysis of national practice patterns in the United States.
    Slopnick EA; Chapman GC; Roberts K; Sheyn DD; El-Nashar S; Mahajan ST
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):791-797. PubMed ID: 32507910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical trends and patient factors associated with the treatment of apical pelvic organ prolapse from a national sample.
    Slopnick EA; Petrikovets A; Sheyn D; Kim SP; Nguyen CT; Hijaz AK
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):603-609. PubMed ID: 30283975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short-term complications associated with the use of transvaginal mesh in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: Results from a multi-institutional prospectively maintained dataset.
    Caveney M; Haddad D; Matthews C; Badlani G; Mirzazadeh M
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2017 Nov; 36(8):2044-2048. PubMed ID: 28407297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The incidence of transfusion and associated risk factors in pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Pandya LK; Lynch CD; Hundley AF; Nekkanti S; Hudson CO
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):612.e1-612.e8. PubMed ID: 28709582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uterine preservation for advanced pelvic organ prolapse repair: Anatomical results and patient satisfaction.
    Fink K; Shachar IB; Braun NM
    Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 27564289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.