317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34743050)
1. Recording brain responses to TMS of primary motor cortex by EEG - utility of an optimized sham procedure.
Gordon PC; Jovellar DB; Song Y; Zrenner C; Belardinelli P; Siebner HR; Ziemann U
Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118708. PubMed ID: 34743050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evoked EEG Responses to TMS Targeting Regions Outside the Primary Motor Cortex and Their Test-Retest Reliability.
Song Y; Gordon PC; Metsomaa J; Rostami M; Belardinelli P; Ziemann U
Brain Topogr; 2024 Jan; 37(1):19-36. PubMed ID: 37996562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of cortical EEG responses to realistic sham versus real TMS of human motor cortex.
Gordon PC; Desideri D; Belardinelli P; Zrenner C; Ziemann U
Brain Stimul; 2018; 11(6):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 30143417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The non-transcranial TMS-evoked potential is an inherent source of ambiguity in TMS-EEG studies.
Conde V; Tomasevic L; Akopian I; Stanek K; Saturnino GB; Thielscher A; Bergmann TO; Siebner HR
Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 185():300-312. PubMed ID: 30347282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Disentangling EEG responses to TMS due to cortical and peripheral activations.
Rocchi L; Di Santo A; Brown K; Ibáñez J; Casula E; Rawji V; Di Lazzaro V; Koch G; Rothwell J
Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 33127580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterizing and minimizing the contribution of sensory inputs to TMS-evoked potentials.
Biabani M; Fornito A; Mutanen TP; Morrow J; Rogasch NC
Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(6):1537-1552. PubMed ID: 31377097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Untangling TMS-EEG responses caused by TMS versus sensory input using optimized sham control and GABAergic challenge.
Gordon PC; Song YF; Jovellar DB; Rostami M; Belardinelli P; Ziemann U
J Physiol; 2023 May; 601(10):1981-1998. PubMed ID: 36965075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Removing artefacts from TMS-EEG recordings using independent component analysis: importance for assessing prefrontal and motor cortex network properties.
Rogasch NC; Thomson RH; Farzan F; Fitzgibbon BM; Bailey NW; Hernandez-Pavon JC; Daskalakis ZJ; Fitzgerald PB
Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():425-39. PubMed ID: 25067813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The correspondence between EMG and EEG measures of changes in cortical excitability following transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Biabani M; Fornito A; Coxon JP; Fulcher BD; Rogasch NC
J Physiol; 2021 Jun; 599(11):2907-2932. PubMed ID: 33599980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pinging the brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals cortical reactivity in time and space.
Ahn S; Fröhlich F
Brain Stimul; 2021; 14(2):304-315. PubMed ID: 33516859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of sensory potentials on transcranial magnetic stimulation - Electroencephalography recordings.
Chowdhury NS; Rogasch NC; Chiang AKI; Millard SK; Skippen P; Chang WJ; Bilska K; Si E; Seminowicz DA; Schabrun SM
Clin Neurophysiol; 2022 Aug; 140():98-109. PubMed ID: 35760007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transcranial magnetic stimulation and cortical evoked potentials: a TMS/EEG co-registration study.
Bonato C; Miniussi C; Rossini PM
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Aug; 117(8):1699-707. PubMed ID: 16797232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying site- and stimulation-specific TMS-evoked EEG potentials using a quantitative cosine similarity metric.
Freedberg M; Reeves JA; Hussain SJ; Zaghloul KA; Wassermann EM
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0216185. PubMed ID: 31929531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Isolating sensory artifacts in the suprathreshold TMS-EEG signal over DLPFC.
Poorganji M; Zomorrodi R; Hawco C; Hill AT; Hadas I; Zrenner C; Rajji TK; Chen R; Voineskos D; Blumberger DM; Daskalakis ZJ
Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6796. PubMed ID: 37100795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A structured ICA-based process for removing auditory evoked potentials.
Ross JM; Ozdemir RA; Lian SJ; Fried PJ; Schmitt EM; Inouye SK; Pascual-Leone A; Shafi MM
Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):1391. PubMed ID: 35082350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Motor cortex oscillates at its intrinsic post-movement beta rhythm following real (but not sham) single pulse, rhythmic and arrhythmic transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Hannah R; Muralidharan V; Aron AR
Neuroimage; 2022 May; 251():118975. PubMed ID: 35134408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phase of sensorimotor μ-oscillation modulates cortical responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.
Desideri D; Zrenner C; Ziemann U; Belardinelli P
J Physiol; 2019 Dec; 597(23):5671-5686. PubMed ID: 31535388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating the Origin of TMS-evoked Brain Potentials Using Topographic Analysis.
Sulcova D; Salatino A; Ivanoiu A; Mouraux A
Brain Topogr; 2022 Nov; 35(5-6):583-598. PubMed ID: 36289133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. EEG responses induced by cerebellar TMS at rest and during visuomotor adaptation.
Fong PY; Spampinato D; Michell K; Mancuso M; Brown K; Ibáñez J; Santo AD; Latorre A; Bhatia K; Rothwell JC; Rocchi L
Neuroimage; 2023 Jul; 275():120188. PubMed ID: 37230209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Probing regional cortical excitability via input-output properties using transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography coupling.
Raffin E; Harquel S; Passera B; Chauvin A; Bougerol T; David O
Hum Brain Mapp; 2020 Jul; 41(10):2741-2761. PubMed ID: 32379389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
