These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3474315)

  • 21. Stability of the mandible after sagittal ramus osteotomy for correction of prognathism.
    Kobayashi T; Watanabe I; Ueda K; Nakajima T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1986 Sep; 44(9):693-7. PubMed ID: 3462361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Finite element model of facial soft tissue. Effects of thickness and stiffness on changes following simulation of orthognathic surgery.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshizumi A; Nakajima A; Kishi M; Namura S
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1993 Jun; 35(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 8410205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dynamic changes in morphometric analysis in patients following Class III bimaxillary surgery.
    Downarowicz P; Matthews-Brzozowska T; Kawala B; Drohomyretska M
    Adv Clin Exp Med; 2012; 21(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 23214305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Factors influencing the predictability of soft tissue profile changes following mandibular setback surgery.
    Mobarak KA; Krogstad O; Espeland L; Lyberg T
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):216-27. PubMed ID: 11407775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changes in soft tissue profile after mandibular setback surgery in Class III subjects.
    Marşan G; Oztaş E; Kuvat SV; Cura N; Emekli U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 19153028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stability of hard tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
    Joss CU; Thüer UW
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 18678756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy.
    Gjørup H; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):312-23. PubMed ID: 1927981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of facial osteotomy with the aid of Moiré contourography.
    Kanazawa E; Kamiishi H
    J Maxillofac Surg; 1978 Nov; 6(4):233-8. PubMed ID: 282388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Skeletal changes after modified intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism.
    Lai SS; Tseng YC; Huang IY; Yang YH; Shen YS; Chen CM
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2007; 60(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17223511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Facial soft-tissue changes in skeletal Class III orthognathic surgery patients analyzed with 3-dimensional laser scanning.
    Baik HS; Kim SY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 20691358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genioplasty: the versatility of horizontal osteotomy.
    Hinds EC; Kent JN
    J Oral Surg; 1969 Sep; 27(9):690-700. PubMed ID: 5257226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [A case of combined surgery of Le Fort I osteotomy and the sagittal split method for mandibular prognathism].
    Tsuji S; Nakayama K; Yasuda K; Inamoto H; Fukaya M
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1985 Jun; 23(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 3867296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mandibular rami osteotomies and their effect on the gonial angle.
    Jönsson E; Svartz K; Welander U; Astrand P
    Int J Oral Surg; 1981 Jun; 10(3):168-72. PubMed ID: 6797971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement and setback surgery an average of 12 years postoperatively.
    Eggensperger NM; Lieger O; Thüer U; Iizuka T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2301-10. PubMed ID: 17954329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A modified mandibular ramus osteotomy for orthognathic surgery.
    Weber W
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Feb; 59(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 11214001
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of prognathism surgery on the width and the length of the lower third of the face.
    Reychler H; Schilli W; Ewers R
    J Maxillofac Surg; 1980 May; 8(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 6929878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.
    Han JJ; Yang HJ; Lee SJ; Hwang SJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 24411469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Severe mandibular prognathism: report of two cases and soft tissue profile analysis].
    Uji T; Masui I; Umeda K; Imai M; Honda T; Komoto K
    Fukuoka Shika Daigaku Gakkai Zasshi; 1987; 14(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 3504778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Morphological compensatory mechanisms in the craniofacial complex of adult mandibular prognathism. 1. Inclination of the mandibular incisors].
    Yoshitani S
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Sep; 44(3):508-16. PubMed ID: 3866808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.