158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34744023)
1. On the molecular mechanisms implicated in the bipolar cancellation of membrane electroporation.
Tang J; Wang S; Yang L; Wu Z; Jiang H; Zeng B; Gong Y
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2022 Feb; 1864(1):183811. PubMed ID: 34744023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interpretation of the molecular mechanism of the electroporation induced by symmetrical bipolar picosecond pulse trains.
Tang J; Ma J; Guo L; Wang K; Yang Y; Bo W; Yang L; Wang Z; Jiang H; Wu Z; Zeng B; Gong Y
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2020 May; 1862(5):183213. PubMed ID: 32057755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The second phase of bipolar, nanosecond-range electric pulses determines the electroporation efficiency.
Pakhomov AG; Grigoryev S; Semenov I; Casciola M; Jiang C; Xiao S
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Aug; 122():123-133. PubMed ID: 29627664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Action spectra and mechanisms of (in) efficiency of bipolar electric pulses at electroporation.
Kim V; Semenov I; Kiester AS; Keppler MA; Ibey BL; Bixler JN; Pakhomov AG
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Feb; 149():108319. PubMed ID: 36375440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantification of cell membrane permeability induced by monopolar and high-frequency bipolar bursts of electrical pulses.
Sweeney DC; Reberšek M; Dermol J; Rems L; Miklavčič D; Davalos RV
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2016 Nov; 1858(11):2689-2698. PubMed ID: 27372268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cancellation of cellular responses to nanoelectroporation by reversing the stimulus polarity.
Pakhomov AG; Semenov I; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON; Gregory B; Schoenbach KH; Ullery JC; Beier HT; Rajulapati SR; Ibey BL
Cell Mol Life Sci; 2014 Nov; 71(22):4431-41. PubMed ID: 24748074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Control of the Electroporation Efficiency of Nanosecond Pulses by Swinging the Electric Field Vector Direction.
Kim V; Semenov I; Kiester AS; Keppler MA; Ibey BL; Bixler JN; Colunga Biancatelli RML; Pakhomov AG
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jun; 24(13):. PubMed ID: 37446096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Terahertz Electric Field-Induced Membrane Electroporation by Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Tang J; Yin H; Ma J; Bo W; Yang Y; Xu J; Liu Y; Gong Y
J Membr Biol; 2018 Dec; 251(5-6):681-693. PubMed ID: 30094474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Therapeutic perspectives of high pulse repetition rate electroporation.
de Caro A; Talmont F; Rols MP; Golzio M; Kolosnjaj-Tabi J
Bioelectrochemistry; 2024 Apr; 156():108629. PubMed ID: 38159429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interference targeting of bipolar nanosecond electric pulses for spatially focused electroporation, electrostimulation, and tissue ablation.
Pakhomov AG; Gudvangen E; Xiao S; Semenov I
Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Oct; 141():107876. PubMed ID: 34171507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electropermeabilization by uni- or bipolar nanosecond electric pulses: The impact of extracellular conductivity.
Gianulis EC; Casciola M; Xiao S; Pakhomova ON; Pakhomov AG
Bioelectrochemistry; 2018 Feb; 119():10-19. PubMed ID: 28865240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of asymmetrical bipolar pulses and interphase intervals on the bipolar cancellation phenomenon in the ovarian cancer cell line.
Łapińska Z; Novickij V; Rembiałkowska N; Szewczyk A; Dubińska-Magiera M; Kulbacka J; Saczko J
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Oct; 153():108483. PubMed ID: 37301162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Next generation CANCAN focusing for remote stimulation by nanosecond electric pulses.
Pakhomov AG; Gudvangen E; Mangalanathan U; Kondratiev O; Redondo L; Semenov I
Bioelectrochemistry; 2023 Aug; 152():108437. PubMed ID: 37030093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In-vitro bipolar nano- and microsecond electro-pulse bursts for irreversible electroporation therapies.
Sano MB; Arena CB; DeWitt MR; Saur D; Davalos RV
Bioelectrochemistry; 2014 Dec; 100():69-79. PubMed ID: 25131187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiphysics modelling of electroporation under uni- or bipolar nanosecond pulse sequences.
Guo F; Qian K; Zhang L; Liu X; Peng H
Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Oct; 141():107878. PubMed ID: 34198114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-voltage 10 ns delayed paired or bipolar pulses for in vitro bioelectric experiments.
Orlacchio R; Carr L; Palego C; Arnaud-Cormos D; Leveque P
Bioelectrochemistry; 2021 Feb; 137():107648. PubMed ID: 32927361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nanoelectropulse-driven membrane perturbation and small molecule permeabilization.
Vernier PT; Sun Y; Gundersen MA
BMC Cell Biol; 2006 Oct; 7():37. PubMed ID: 17052354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stimulation or Cancellation of Ca
Bagalkot TR; Leblanc N; Craviso GL
Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11545. PubMed ID: 31395918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Modulation of biological responses to 2 ns electrical stimuli by field reversal.
Sözer EB; Vernier PT
Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr; 2019 Jun; 1861(6):1228-1239. PubMed ID: 30981731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bipolar nanosecond electric pulses are less efficient at electropermeabilization and killing cells than monopolar pulses.
Ibey BL; Ullery JC; Pakhomova ON; Roth CC; Semenov I; Beier HT; Tarango M; Xiao S; Schoenbach KH; Pakhomov AG
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2014 Jan; 443(2):568-73. PubMed ID: 24332942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
