These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3474405)

  • 1. An in vitro study of an electronic pantograph.
    Anderson GC; Schulte JK; Arnold TG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 May; 57(5):577-80. PubMed ID: 3474405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of an electronic and a mechanical pantograph. Part I: Consistency of an electronic computerized pantograph to record articulator settings.
    Beard CC; Donaldson K; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 May; 55(5):570-4. PubMed ID: 3458908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of articulator settings obtained by using an electronic pantograph and lateral interocclusal recordings.
    Price RB; Bannerman RA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 3172002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part II: Results.
    Hatano Y; Kolling JN; Stern N; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Apr; 61(4):425-9. PubMed ID: 2724155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A graphic comparison of mandibular border movements generated by various articulators. Part I: Methodology.
    Stern N; Hatano Y; Kolling JN; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Aug; 60(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 3172004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the intercondylar distance and the interfacial width as used with the electronic pantograph.
    Mandilaris CB; Beard CC; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Mar; 67(3):331-4. PubMed ID: 1507096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study.
    Pelletier LB; Campbell SD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 1774679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Electronic pantography].
    Clayton JA
    Phillip J Restaur Zahnmed; 1986 Feb; 3(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 3014603
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An electronic gothic arch tracer.
    Heimansohn H
    Dent Surv; 1980 Dec; 56(12):30-4. PubMed ID: 6939635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Use of pantographic recordings in the diagnosis of dysfunctional disorders of the TMJ. 2: Electronic pantography].
    Simonet PF; Clayton JA
    Cah Prothese; 1986 Sep; 14(55):137-51. PubMed ID: 3464330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stabilizing the pantograph from patient to articulator.
    Schneider RL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Aug; 52(2):310. PubMed ID: 6590847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study to expand the linear range of the mandibular kinesiograph.
    Kim IK
    Taehan Chikkwa Uisa Hyophoe Chi; 1984 Jul; 22(7):621-33. PubMed ID: 6596354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technique for transferring information from a pantograph tracing to semiadjustable articulators.
    Gordon SR; Stoffer WM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Oct; 54(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 3862808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation of the reproducibility of articulators.
    Chou TM; Pameijer CH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Oct; 58(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 3478476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [T.T. articulator pantograph].
    Tamaki T; Tamaki ST
    Ars Curandi Odontol; 1977 Dec; 4(9):50-7. PubMed ID: 293159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pantograph clutch retention and stability.
    Jennings DE; Foerster JG; Butler GV
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jun; 61(6):652-4. PubMed ID: 2724163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electronic PRI consistency in diagnosing temporomandibular joint dysfunction.
    Beard CC; Clayton JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Feb; 55(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 3457157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Errors incurred in programming a fully adjustable articulator with a pantograph.
    Curtis DA; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Apr; 55(4):427-9. PubMed ID: 3457176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the equivalence of jaw and articulator movements.
    Dos Santos Júnior J; Ash MM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1988 Jan; 59(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 3422300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of lateral interocclusal records to pantographic tracings.
    Curtis DA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jul; 62(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2746537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.