157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34746086)
21. Design of a protective shield for a radiological emergency intervention using Monte Carlo simulation and an anthropomorphic phantom.
El-Ouardi Y; Aknouch A; Dadouch A; Mouhib M; Benmessaoud M
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2022 Aug; 61(3):425-433. PubMed ID: 35831755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effect of leaded glasses and thyroid shielding on cone beam CT radiation dose in an adult female phantom.
Goren AD; Prins RD; Dauer LT; Quinn B; Al-Najjar A; Faber RD; Patchell G; Branets I; Colosi DC
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(6):20120260. PubMed ID: 23412460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Applicability and limitations of the Adam mathematical phantom with respect to radiological protection.
Smiljanic I; Schultz FW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(1):89-92. PubMed ID: 15367775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validation of a Monte Carlo model used for simulating tube current modulation in computed tomography over a wide range of phantom conditions/challenges.
Bostani M; McMillan K; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112101. PubMed ID: 25370652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Breast Shielding Combined With an Optimized Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Pregnancy Protocol: A Special Use-Case for Shielding?
Gillespie CD; Yates A; Murphy MC; Hughes M; Ewins K; NíAinle F; Bolster F; Rowan M; Foley S; MacMahon PJ
J Thorac Imaging; 2023 Jan; 38(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 36162076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Achievable dose reductions with gonadal shielding for children and adults during abdominal/pelvic radiographic examinations: A Monte Carlo simulation.
Somasundaram E; Brady SL; Strauss KJ
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5514-5522. PubMed ID: 32978986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Toward automated and personalized organ dose determination in CT examinations - A comparison of two tissue characterization models for Monte Carlo organ dose calculation with a Therapy Planning System.
Källman HE; Traneus E; Ahnesjö A
Med Phys; 2019 Feb; 46(2):1012-1023. PubMed ID: 30582891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Female gonadal shielding with automatic exposure control increases radiation risks.
Kaplan SL; Magill D; Felice MA; Xiao R; Ali S; Zhu X
Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Feb; 48(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 29046919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Physical validation of a Monte Carlo-based, phantom-derived approach to computed tomography organ dosimetry under tube current modulation.
Stepusin EJ; Long DJ; Ficarrotta KR; Hintenlang DE; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5423-5432. PubMed ID: 28688151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Role of shielding in modulating the effects of solar particle events: Monte Carlo calculation of absorbed dose and DNA complex lesions in different organs.
Ballarini F; Biaggi M; De Biaggi L; Ferrari A; Ottolenghi A; Panzarasa A; Paretzke HG; Pelliccioni M; Sala P; Scannicchio D; Zankl M
Adv Space Res; 2004; 34(6):1338-46. PubMed ID: 15881774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An investigation on protection properties of Tantalum (V) oxide reinforced glass screens on unexposed breast tissue for mammography examinations.
Alan HY; ALMisned G; Yilmaz A; Susam LA; Ilik E; Kilic G; Ozturk G; Tuysuz B; Akkus B; Tekin HO
Radiography (Lond); 2024 Jan; 30(1):282-287. PubMed ID: 38041916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The efficiency of lead and non-lead shielding on breast dose in head CT.
Trožić Š; Mekiš N; Zalokar N
J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):816-826. PubMed ID: 32460255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Exploring innovative radiation shielding approaches in space: A material and design study for a wearable radiation protection spacesuit.
Vuolo M; Baiocco G; Barbieri S; Bocchini L; Giraudo M; Gheysens T; Lobascio C; Ottolenghi A
Life Sci Space Res (Amst); 2017 Nov; 15():69-78. PubMed ID: 29198316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is radiography justified for the evaluation of patients presenting with cervical spine trauma?
Theocharopoulos N; Chatzakis G; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4461-70. PubMed ID: 19928077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effectiveness of bismuth breast shielding with protocol optimization in CT Thorax examination.
Karim MKA; Rahim NA; Matsubara K; Hashim S; Mhareb MHA; Musa Y
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(1):139-147. PubMed ID: 30584178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. MCNPX Estimation of Photoneutron Dose to Eye Voxel Anthropomorphic Phantom From 18 MV Linear Accelerator.
Alghamdi AA
Dose Response; 2023; 21(2):15593258231169807. PubMed ID: 37077717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding.
Coursey C; Frush DP; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; Greenberg SB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jan; 190(1):W54-61. PubMed ID: 18094273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development and Validation of the Realistic Anthropomorphic Flexible (RAF) Phantom.
Lombardo PA; Vanhavere F; Lebacq AL; Struelens L; Bogaerts R
Health Phys; 2018 May; 114(5):486-499. PubMed ID: 29578897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of breast absorbed doses during thoracic computed tomography scan to evaluate the effectiveness of bismuth shielding.
Alonso TC; Mourão AP; Santana PC; da Silva TA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Nov; 117():55-57. PubMed ID: 27033028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Validation of GATE for bone and bone marrow with calculation specific absorbed fraction for photons.
Ghaseminezhad SZ; Sadremomtaz A; Rajabi H
J Cancer Res Ther; 2018; 14(3):647-650. PubMed ID: 29893333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
