These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34746847)

  • 21. The Positive Patient Experience: A Comprehensive Analysis of Plastic Surgery Online Reviews.
    Chang IA; Wells MW; Chang IA; Arquette CP; Tang CJ; Gatherwright JR; Furnas HJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2022 Aug; 42(9):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 35417545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What explains very poor Yelp reviews of oral and maxillofacial surgeons in private practice?
    Stanbouly D; Baron M; Pierre R; Khan OA; Fahmy R; Caraballo BA; Choi JY; Arce K; Tannyhill RJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Jun; 135(6):746-752. PubMed ID: 36529671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
    Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
    Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative Analysis of User-Generated Online Yelp Reviews for Periodontal Practices in Multiple Metropolitan Markets.
    Holtzclaw DJ
    J Periodontol; 2017 Feb; 88(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 27786618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Getting to the Bottom of Patient Experiences with Genital Gender Affirmation Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Online Reviews.
    Moog D; Latack KR; Adidharma W; Haley C; Satterwhite T; Morrison SD
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2021 Dec; 45(6):2990-2995. PubMed ID: 33543343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Chronic Pain Practices: An Evaluation of Positive and Negative Online Patient Reviews.
    Orhurhu MS; Salisu B; Sottosanti E; Abimbola N; Urits I; Jones M; Viswanath O; Kaye AD; Simopoulos T; Orhurhu V
    Pain Physician; 2019 Sep; 22(5):E477-E486. PubMed ID: 31561660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Describing the patient experience from Yelp reviews of community pharmacies.
    Lester CA; Wang M; Vydiswaran VGV
    J Am Pharm Assoc (2003); 2019; 59(3):349-355. PubMed ID: 31000435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Online Ratings of the Patient Experience: Emergency Departments Versus Urgent Care Centers.
    Agarwal AK; Mahoney K; Lanza AL; Klinger EV; Asch DA; Fausti N; Tufts C; Ungar L; Merchant RM
    Ann Emerg Med; 2019 Jun; 73(6):631-638. PubMed ID: 30392737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ratings game: an analysis of Nursing Home Compare and Yelp ratings.
    Johari K; Kellogg C; Vazquez K; Irvine K; Rahman A; Enguidanos S
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2018 Aug; 27(8):619-624. PubMed ID: 29133461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Building better pediatric surgeons: A sentiment analysis of online physician review websites.
    Butler LR; Tang JE; Hess SM; White CA; Arvind V; Kim JS; Allen AK; Ranade SC
    J Child Orthop; 2022 Dec; 16(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 36483646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What Are Patients Saying About Minimally Invasive Spine Surgeons Online: A Sentiment Analysis of 2,235 Physician Review Website Reviews.
    Tang J; White CA; Arvind V; Cho S; Kim JS; Steinberger J
    Cureus; 2022 Apr; 14(4):e24113. PubMed ID: 35573577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Abdominoplasty.
    Qiu CS; Hockney SM; Turin SY; Dorfman RG; Kim JYS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Mar; 143(3):734-742. PubMed ID: 30817644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Patient experiences at dental school clinics: A comparative analysis of online reviews.
    Gupta R; Alraqiq HM
    J Dent Educ; 2022 Jan; 86(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 34467545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of Dermatology Practice Online Reviews: Lessons From Qualitative Analysis.
    Smith RJ; Lipoff JB
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Feb; 152(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 26606326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Impact of Surgeon Gender on Online Physician Reviews.
    Marrero K; King E; Fingeret AL
    J Surg Res; 2020 Jan; 245():510-515. PubMed ID: 31446193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Yelp Reviews Of Hospital Care Can Supplement And Inform Traditional Surveys Of The Patient Experience Of Care.
    Ranard BL; Werner RM; Antanavicius T; Schwartz HA; Smith RJ; Meisel ZF; Asch DA; Ungar LH; Merchant RM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2016 Apr; 35(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 27044971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Online Reviews as Health Data: Examining the Association Between Availability of Health Care Services and Patient Star Ratings Exemplified by the Yelp Academic Dataset.
    Tran NN; Lee J
    JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2017 Jul; 3(3):e43. PubMed ID: 28701293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Questioning the Yelp Effect: Mixed Methods Analysis of Web-Based Reviews of Urgent Cares.
    Hu D; Liu CM; Hamdy R; Cziner M; Fung M; Dobbs S; Rogers L; Turner MM; Broniatowski DA
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e29406. PubMed ID: 34623316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
    Velasco BT; Chien B; Kwon JY; Miller CP
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30795702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.