BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34747139)

  • 1. Implementation and Efficacy of a Large-Scale Radiation Oncology Case-Based Peer-Review Quality Program across a Multinational Cancer Network.
    Ludmir EB; Hoffman KE; Jhingran A; Kouzy R; Ip MP; Sturdevant L; Ning MS; Minsky BD; McAleer MF; Chronowski GM; Arzu IY; Reed VK; Garg AK; Roberts T; Eastwick GA; Olson MR; Selek U; Gabel M; Koong AC; Kupferman ME; Kuban DA
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2024; 14(3):e173-e179. PubMed ID: 38176466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancing quality assurance in radiotherapy for gynaecological cancers: implementation of an on-demand peer review process.
    Bhattacharyya T; Chakraborty S; Achari RB; Mallick I; Arunsingh M; Shenoy S; Harilal V; Phesao V; Maulik S; Manjunath NV; Mukherjee P; Sarkar N; Sinha A; Sarkar S; Vashistha B; Khanum H; Chatterjee S
    Br J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 97(1155):680-693. PubMed ID: 38401533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Standards and quality assurance in interventional oncology: The establishment of the International Accreditation System for Interventional Oncology Services (IASIOS).
    Kenny L; Karlsdottir M
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2023 Dec; 67(8):926-929. PubMed ID: 36815520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ACPSEM position paper: pre-treatment patient specific plan checks and quality assurance in radiation oncology.
    Fog LS; Webb LK; Barber J; Jennings M; Towns S; Olivera S; Shakeshaft J;
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Mar; 47(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 38315415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Regional cancer centre demonstrates voluntary conformity with the national Radiation Oncology Practice Standards.
    Manley S; Last A; Fu K; Greenham S; Kovendy A; Shakespeare TP
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2015 Jun; 62(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 26229680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Guidelines for safe practice of stereotactic body (ablative) radiation therapy: RANZCR 2023 update.
    Liu HY; Hardcastle N; Bailey M; Siva S; Seeley A; Barry T; Booth J; Lao L; Roach M; Buxton S; Thwaites D; Foote M
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2024 Mar; 68(2):217-227. PubMed ID: 38160448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Radiation Therapist profession through the lens of new technology: A practice development paper based on the ESTRO Radiation Therapist Workshops.
    Leech M; Abdalqader A; Alexander S; Anderson N; Barbosa B; Callens D; Chapman V; Coffey M; Cox M; Curic I; Dean J; Denney E; Kearney M; Leung VWS; Mortsiefer M; Nirgianaki E; Povilaitis J; Strikou D; Thompson K; van den Bosch M; Velec M; Woodford K; Buijs M
    Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol; 2024 Jun; 30():100243. PubMed ID: 38831996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Restructuring Our Approach to Peer Review: A Critical Need to Improve the Quality and Safety of Radiation Therapy.
    Chera BS; Potters L; Marks LB
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2020; 10(5):321-323. PubMed ID: 32888525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information Quality in Regulatory Decision Making: Peer Review versus Good Laboratory Practice.
    McCarty LS; Borgert CJ; Mihaich EM
    Environ Health Perspect; 2012 Jul; 120(7):927-34. PubMed ID: 22343028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Highlighting efficiency and redundancy in the Royal Australian College of General Practice standards for accreditation.
    McNaughton D; Mara P; Jones M
    Aust Health Rev; 2024 Jun; 48(3):228-234. PubMed ID: 38507811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. WITHDRAWN: Meetings and courses.
    None N
    Clin Imaging; 2015 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 25835587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Upcoming meetings and courses.
    J Child Orthop; 2014 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 24496872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation oncology peer review in Australia and New Zealand.
    Chin S; Or M; Ong WL; Millar J; Chilkuri M; Vinod S
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2022 Mar; 66(2):258-266. PubMed ID: 35243786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of a real-time peer review audit on patient management in a radiation oncology department.
    Boxer M; Forstner D; Kneebone A; Delaney G; Koh ES; Fuller M; Kaadan N
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Aug; 53(4):405-11. PubMed ID: 19695048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Is rural radiation oncology practice quality as good as the big smoke? Results of the Australian radiotherapy single machine unit trial.
    Shakespeare TP; Turner M; Chapman A
    Australas Radiol; 2007 Aug; 51(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 17635479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation Oncology Quality Assessment Tool: A proposal for a new audit tool in modern radiation oncology.
    Atwell DB; Booth C; Vignarajah DD; Knesl M; Buddle N; Hoozer M; Min M
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Oct; 63(5):691-697. PubMed ID: 31376236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Faculty of Radiation Oncology Position Paper on the use of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy.
    Tiong A; Lao L; MacKean J; Goonetilleke M; Kron T
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Dec; 60(6):772-780. PubMed ID: 27122102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of radiation therapist-led structured peer review meetings on compliance to Radiation Oncology Practice Standards.
    West K; Hardcastle-Fowler T; Coburn N; Beldham-Collins R; Harris J; Ahern V
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2022 Feb; 66(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 34747139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.