These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34747635)

  • 1. Simulated Capped Application Process for Urology Applicants.
    Friedman DT; Feustel PJ; Kogan BA
    J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):271-273. PubMed ID: 34747635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Training of Tunisian future urologists: how to improve it ?
    Naouar S; Binous MY; Braiek S; El Kamel R
    Tunis Med; 2018 Jul; 96(7):401-404. PubMed ID: 30430482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current status of young urologists and residents' activity and academic training in Spain. National survey results.
    Rodríguez Socarrás M; Ciappara M; García Sanz M; Pesquera L; Carrión DM; Tortolero L; Palou Redorta J; Cózar-Olmo JM; Esteban Fuertes M; Gómez Rivas J
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2019 May; 43(4):169-175. PubMed ID: 30846289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Capturing the Perspective of Prospective Urology Applicants: Impacts of COVID-19 on Medical Education.
    Hanson KA; Borofsky MS; Hampson LA; Breyer BN; Kern NG; Conti SL; Kielb SJ; Sorensen MD
    Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():36-42. PubMed ID: 33007312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Urology Practice in Indonesia: A Nationwide Survey.
    Rasyid N; Birowo P; Parikesit D; Rahman F
    Urol J; 2020 Nov; 17(6):677-679. PubMed ID: 33159316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulated Capped Application Process for Urology Applicants. Letter.
    Weissbart SJ; Stock JA
    J Urol; 2022 May; 207(5):1164-1165. PubMed ID: 35171003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey of Applicant Experience and Cost in the Urology Match: Opportunities for Reform.
    Nikonow TN; Lyon TD; Jackman SV; Averch TD
    J Urol; 2015 Oct; 194(4):1063-7. PubMed ID: 25912495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consistencies and Discrepancies Between the Expectations of Urology Trainees and the Experience of Practicing Urologists.
    Cheng JW; Wagner H; Hernandez BC; Ruckle HC
    Urology; 2019 May; 127():42-48. PubMed ID: 30742865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating Urology Residency Applications: What Matters Most and What Comes Next?
    Huang MM; Clifton MM
    Curr Urol Rep; 2020 Aug; 21(10):37. PubMed ID: 32803400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stressors and Coping Mechanisms Related to Burnout Within Urology.
    Cheng JW; Wagner H; Hernandez BC; Hu BR; Ko EY; Ruckle HC
    Urology; 2020 May; 139():27-36. PubMed ID: 32032685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Phase 2 of the Coronavirus Pandemic in Urology: Ramping Up Surgical Caseload and Resident Training while COVID-19 Infections Decrease.
    Borgmann H; Boehm K; Brandt MP; Kamal MM; Mager R; Höfner T; Tsaur I; Haferkamp A
    Urol Int; 2021; 105(7-8):724-725. PubMed ID: 33684918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Urology Applicant: An Analysis of Contemporary Urology Residency Candidates.
    Lebastchi AH; Khouri RK; McLaren ID; Faerber GJ; Kraft KH; Hafez KS; Dauw CA; Bird VG; Stringer TF; Singla AK; Sorensen MD; Wessells H; Ambani SN
    Urology; 2018 May; 115():51-58. PubMed ID: 29408686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Virtual Urology Residency Match Process: Moving Beyond the Pandemic.
    Carpinito GP; Khouri RK; Kenigsberg AP; Ganesan V; Kuprasertkul A; Caldwell KM; Hudak SJ; Lemack GE
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():33-38. PubMed ID: 34280439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Publication misrepresentation among urology residency applicants.
    Hsi RS; Hotaling JM; Moore TN; Joyner BD
    World J Urol; 2013 Jun; 31(3):697-702. PubMed ID: 22729465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experiences With Quality Improvement in Training: A National Survey of Urology Residents.
    Malhotra NR; Lee YJ; Millar MM; Cartwright PC; Smith BK
    Urology; 2020 Nov; 145():83-89. PubMed ID: 32735977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. USMLE Step 1 Scoring Changes and the Urology Residency Application Process: Program Directors' Perspectives.
    Chisholm LP; Drolet BC
    Urology; 2020 Nov; 145():79-82. PubMed ID: 32882303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Content Analysis of ACGME Accredited Urology Residency Program Webpages.
    Patel BG; Gallo K; Cherullo EE; Chow AK
    Urology; 2020 Apr; 138():11-15. PubMed ID: 31954168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of COVID-19 on Urology Residency Training: A Nationwide Survey of Program Directors by the Society of Academic Urologists.
    Rosen GH; Murray KS; Greene KL; Pruthi RS; Richstone L; Mirza M
    J Urol; 2020 Nov; 204(5):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 32463716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The COVID-19 Residency Application Cycle Did Not Affect Geographic Dispersal Patterns Among Applicants Entering the Urology Match: A Quantitative Mapping Study.
    Gabrielson AT; Meilchen CK; Kohn JR; Kohn TP
    Urology; 2021 Dec; 158():26-32. PubMed ID: 34324912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in urology graduate medical education: a brief update from the Urology Residency Review Committee.
    Miller DC; Link RE; Olsson CA;
    J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1062-4. PubMed ID: 15311038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.